Archive for the ‘Pennsylvania Natural Gas Drilling’ Category
PEC Basic-SafeGulf/SafeLand Orientation
The PEC Basic-SafeGulf/SafeLand Orientation safety awareness course was designed to take the place of multiple Operator orientations and to give each student a general idea of life and safety issues in the oil and gas industry, upstream, downstream, onshore or offshore. This one-day program meets API RP 75 and API RP T-1 requirements and provides a basic understanding at an awareness level of certain general safety information that an employee should know before entering a company facility and while performing their assigned work duties. Over 25 of the leading oil and gas operators accept this orientation as it meets their requirements. Upon successful completion of course, each student is issued a picture ID with unique barcode. The student information is then stored in an online database. PLEASE BRING PHOTO I.D.
Gas industry seeks early tax break
By Robert Swift (Harrisburg Bureau Chief)
Published: August 10, 2010
HARRISBURG – The natural gas industry is lobbying lawmakers to tax natural gas production at a lower rate during a well’s early years of production.
Proposals for a three-tiered well tax, requiring pooling together land parcels for drilling operations and making drilling a permitted use for local zoning are being advanced by the Marcellus Shale Coalition, an industry trade group. A copy of the coalition’s legislative agenda is circulating at the Capitol.
“Together, these policies will help ensure that Marcellus development remains competitive with other shale gas producing states and that critical capital investment will continue to flow into the region,” coalition president Kathryn Klaber said Monday.
Tax deadline Oct. 1
The coalition’s proposal surfaces with leaders of the House and Senate declaring their intent to pass a state severance tax by Oct. 1 and have it go into effect Jan. 1, 2011. The declaration is part of a state budget package enacted last month. Lawmakers return to session in mid-September with the Marcellus Shale and transportation funding issues competing for attention.
The newest details in the proposal focus on what production would be taxed at lower rates or exempt, an already contentious issue in Harrisburg.
Under the proposal, “high cost” Marcellus Shale wells that go to 5,000 feet or more below the surface to reach deep gas pockets would be taxed at 1.5 percent of market value of gas produced for the first five years, with a five percent tax rate kicking in after that.
So-called marginal Marcellus wells would be taxed at one percent of market value. These are described as wells not capable of producing more than 150,000 cubic feet of gas per day in a month. Wells not capable of producing more than 90,000 cubic feet of gas per day in a month would be exempt from taxes under the proposal.
Shallow gas wells would be exempt from taxes.
Market value would be defined as the amount generated through cash receipts less the cost of dehydrating, treating, compressing and delivering the gas.
As an example of high costs, the coalition cites a provision in state law that requires Marcellus producers to drill down into the Onondaga Layer which underlies the Marcellus Shale formation if the drilling takes place in a coal region. The added cost can amount to $200,000 per well, it states.
The Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center issued a report recently criticizing tax breaks on new wells as depriving the state of tax revenue during a well’s greatest years of production.
“It would be a severance tax in name only,” said center executive director Sharon Ward.
The industry is seeking a two-sided exemption, with the reduced tax rate at the start and exemption for wells it considers low-producing, said Michael Wood, center research director. A 150,000-cubic-feet threshold is high, he said.
‘Use by right’
In addition, the coalition wants lawmakers to declare drilling a “use by right” in local zoning ordinances. That means drilling would be allowed, without the need for a major review by a local government, as long as it meets the standards specified in an ordinance. A local zoning permit would still be needed, but that would be issued relatively quickly.
This would provide for gas development in an orderly way while allowing municipalities to impose reasonable conditions on land used such as lot size and landscaping and safety features, the coalition said.
“We have problems with that,” said Elam Herr, an official with the Pennsylvania State Association of Township Supervisors. A township can’t exclude drilling under zoning laws, but local officials should be able to say where it takes place and keep it out of areas zoned for residential use, he said.
Other proposals call for providing incentives to convert state and local government and transit vehicles to natural gas fueling and giving priority to tax revenue distribution to host municipalities and counties.
Contact the writer: rswift@timesshamrock.com
View article here.
Copyright: The Daily Review
Commercial Driver (CDL) Training Specific for the Oil and Gas Industry
This 180-hour course takes a participant through the process of obtaining a Class “A” Commercial Driver’s License (CDL). The course will focus upon typical on-road CDL training and include additional training in skills necessary for success in the oil and natural gas industry. Skills such as operating skills on lease roads, high center of gravity loads, and close quarter maneuvering will be studied and practiced. This training is already utilized by many of the leading oil and gas service companies for their current employees.
Johnson hopes to build gas drilling workforce
By RICH HOWELLS rhowells@golackawanna.com
SCRANTON – In order for Johnson College to keep up with the future of Pennsylvania’s industries, the technical school has gone back to its past.
T0 learn more
For more information on Johnson College’s Welding Training Center, visit johnson.edu or contact Marie Allison at (570) 702-8924 or mallison@johnson.edu.
Johnson held an open house on Wednesday of their brand new Welding Training Center, located at 2001 Rosanna Ave. The college hasn’t offered welding training to students since 2002, when they suspended their Welding Program after 33 years due to declining enrollment.
As development of natural gas from the state’s Marcellus Shale continues, the demand has now increased for skilled welders. Johnson hopes to meet that demand through an initiative by the Center for Sustainability at Johnson College, which is dedicated to offering industry-driven curriculum related to clean, green, and sustainable energy concepts.
“Johnson College’s goal is to take welders and specifically train them for the API 1104 code, which is the regulation they’re using for the pipeline in the natural gas industry. Right now, there’s a high demand for pipe welders who can weld to the API 1104 code. That’s primarily been used in southern states, so in this area, there’s not lot of welders trained in that. Our goal is to get local people working on the pipeline,” explained welding instructor Jeff Roughgarden.
Roughgarden, who has more than 10 years of welding experience, said that Johnson is the only school in the area offering a full-time day pipe welding program. The school also offers evening classes. The two courses are Basic Cutting and Welding for Pressure Pipelines, which runs for 400 hours over 16 weeks, and Pipe Welding for experienced welders, which is 125 hours over five weeks. The Welding Training Center also provides booth rentals and customized job training.
“There aren’t many schools locally that do welding training. We’re different because we’re teaching it all at once in short, 16-week segments,” added Marie Allison, director of continuing education.
Most of the drilling is currently being done in Susquehanna County, according to Allison, but more gas well drilling is being planned in Lackawanna County all the time. As high levels of unemployment continue to plague the area, she explained that the addition of these industry jobs is not only crucial to the region, but offer steady, dependable employment as well.
“The longevity (of these jobs) is important. Given that right now there are a lot of industries that are laying off workers, we need career paths that have long-term stability, and I think the gas industry has that. It varies. Some say 15 years, some say 20 years, and some say we’ll be here for 50 years. I think it’s going to be another 15 to 20 years, and that’s going to help a lot of people.”
Allison added that while these programs give students the skills necessary to obtain entry-level positions as welders for the gas industry, the abilities they learn and develop can also be useful in other industries, such as pipe welding for boiler manufacturers.
“These are skill sets that are transferable across industry sectors, but we do expect that most of the individuals would be looking at the gas industry for employment,” Allison said.
The occupation itself, as well as its tough schedule, can be difficult, Allison warned. There are many benefits, however, to those looking to start a career.
“It is a tough field to get into, and it’s a tough career path. It’s sometimes 14 days on, 14 days off,” she said. “There’s a commute, and a lot of individuals have to be prepared to do that. If they are, then there are a lot of opportunities there.”
Copyright: Times Leader
DEP secretary blasts back after N.Y. senators attack Pa. drilling
Published: August 6, 2010
By Laura Legere
Staff Writer
When the New York State Senate passed a nine-month moratorium on a crucial natural gas drilling technique late Tuesday, legislators there held up Pennsylvania, state regulators and a small Susquehanna County community as models for how not to drill for gas in the Marcellus Shale.
The senators’ criticism raised the ire of Pennsylvania Environmental Protection Secretary John Hanger, who defended the state’s environmental regulations on Thursday and criticized New York for riding the moral “high horse while consuming Pennsylvania gas.”
“If they are so ashamed of what’s gone on here perhaps they should stop buying Pennsylvania gas,” Hanger said.
The sponsor of the New York legislation barring hydraulic fracking, Senator Antoine Thompson, twice visited Dimock Township, in Susquehanna County, and Bradford County in the last eight months to learn from citizens and gas companies about the positive and negative effects of drilling – experiences he cited when he introduced the bill for a vote.
“I think because the state of Pennsylvania was so thirsty to get this development opportunity they did not have enough infrastructure in place, making sure they were inspecting the wells properly, making sure that landowners were protected,” Thompson, D-Buffalo, said Tuesday night.
Despite his opposition to the moratorium, New York State Senator Tom Libous, R-Binghamton, spoke even more critically of Pennsylvania.
“Shame on the state of Pennsylvania,” Libous said. “Shame on their Department of Environmental Protection ⦠because they screwed up badly. They didn’t keep an eye on those who were drilling. They didn’t keep an eye on environmental factors on behalf of the citizens of that state.”
Hanger agreed the experience in Dimock was “unacceptable” – the department found that faulty Cabot Oil and Gas Corp. natural gas wells caused methane to contaminate residents’ drinking water there. But he described two years of work the department has dedicated to strengthening Pennsylvania’s drilling standards and enforcement, including doubling the size of its gas enforcement staff while “New York has added nobody.”
“If New York demands to have no impacts from drilling, then they better have a moratorium that extends not just through May 2011, but forever,” he said. “You cannot have drilling, even done well, and get zero impact.”
When companies have “screwed up, like Cabot screwed up in Dimock,” he said, “we’ve come down on them very, very hard.”
Marcellus Shale drilling has been on hold in New York since 2008 when the state’s environmental regulatory agency began reviewing the environmental impact of the deep well drilling and updating its permitting requirements. That review is expected to be completed later this year.
When asked if he wished he had the opportunity to watch a neighboring state learn through trial and error – as the New York State Senate’s vote positions the Empire State to continue to do – Hanger said, “There are pluses and minuses to each state’s approach.”
View article here.
Copyright: The Citizens Voice
A New York State of Mind?
Politicians in NY Senate don’t miss the chance to demagogue the Marcellus with a lopsided vote against HF – but whose interests are they really representing?
Politicians in NY Senate don’t miss the chance to demagogue the Marcellus with a lopsided vote against HF – but whose interests are they really representing?
Those who tell you that natural gas has never been produced from shale in New York don’t know the history of Chautauqua County, and certainly don’t know the story of a fellow by the name of William Hart.
Intrigued by tales he had heard from local settlers of streams and creeks that could literally be set on fire in the area (naturally, of course), Hart made the trip from Connecticut to Fredonia, N.Y. in 1819 — and by 1825, had done something that no one in the world previously had: He drilled a successful natural gas well. Twenty-seven feet deep; right next to that “burning” creek; right into a shallow strata of shale. Thirty-four years later, Col. Edwin Drake would drill the first-ever oil well 70 miles down the road in Titusville, Pennsylvania. Modern society was born.
Most folks don’t identify New York as the birthplace of natural gas, and even those who do are surprised to learn the state has more than 13,000 active wells in operation today. Some for oil, others for natural gas – just about all at some point in their life undergoing a procedure known as hydraulic fracturing, a technology that’s been in use for 60 years and deployed across the country more than 1.1 million times.
Thanks to hydraulic fracturing, New York’s natural gas production over the past 20 years has consistently been on the rise – from 1.7 billion cubic feet a month in 1991, to a peak of 5.35 billion cubic feet produced in in December 2006. Nothing to sneeze at, for sure — but also nothing on the scale of the 2 billion cubic feet that estimates suggest a single county in the Southern Tier (Broome) can produce in a single day by tapping the Marcellus Shale.
Of course, accessing those resources requires the use of hydraulic fracturing. But thanks to a vote in Albany earlier this week, the prospect of this technology being available in the future to help convert this natural gas into jobs (900,000 NY’ers currently unemployed) and revenues (Albany currently dealing with a $9 billion budget shortfall) suddenly became a lot more uncertain. Here’s how Bloomberg reported the story:
The state Senate approved a measure late [Tuesday] that would prohibit new drilling permits until May 15 in the New York portion of the Marcellus Shale …. The moratorium passed 49-9. …
“Not only did they pass it but it passed overwhelmingly,” Assemblyman Robert Sweeney, a Democrat from Suffolk County who sponsored his chamber’s version of the bill, said in an interview. “That opens the way for us to do to the bill in the Assembly where I would expect it to pass with similar overwhelming numbers.”
Just in case you’re scoring at home – no, there is no Marcellus Shale in Suffolk Co., N.Y. And no: It’s not likely that Assemblyman Sweeney knows the history of natural gas in his state, or the important and long-standing role that hydraulic fracturing – which his bill seeks to ban – has played in helping to deliver a portion of the 1.18 trillion cubic feet of natural gas that New York consumes each year.
But you know what else this fellow probably doesn’t know? He doesn’t know that his bill is written in such a way that it could actually be used to shut down all future oil and gas production in New York — even if it doesn’t have a thing to do with the Marcellus Shale. Don’t believe us? Let’s consult the experts over at over at ProPublica:
But the language in the final bill as it is posted on the state’s website does not differentiate between the different ways hydraulic fracturing can be used. It appears to be a blanket prohibition that would also stop hydraulic fracturing in New York’s many vertical oil and gas wells and would apply to drilling in geologic formations outside the Marcellus.
Keep in mind the state of New York is a member of the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission, whose mission is to promote the “responsible development of our own resources,” make “oil and natural gas more affordable for consumers,” and leverage those resources for the purpose of “creating and maintaining jobs.” With this week’s vote, the Senate of New York has unfortunately gone rogue – and in the process cast serious doubt on the jobs, revenue, security and environmental benefits that would’ve been made possible through the responsible development of the Marcellus.
Naturally, the news out of New York this week didn’t escape the notice of PA DEP secretary John Hanger, who rightly took exception with the suggestion from the state Senate that his department has somehow been asleep at the switch – notwithstanding the fact that DEP has added scores of new oversight staff to the rolls (actually doubled it since 2008), and continues to post and enforce some of the most stringent regulations on the development of shale gas in the entire country. Here’s what he told the Wilkes-Barre Citizens Voice today:
The senators’ criticism raised the ire of [Hanger], who defended the state’s environmental regulations on Thursday and criticized New York for riding the moral “high horse while consuming Pennsylvania gas.” “If they are so ashamed of what’s gone on here perhaps they should stop buying Pennsylvania gas,” Hanger said.
The good news is that this debate is far from over, with one leading Democratic candidate for governor in New York telling reporters this week that he still wants to learn all “the facts” before rendering a position on how best to manage this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. Of course, the minute this debate becomes more about facts than fear – that’s the minute we win it. Not for the industry’s sake. Not for the memory of William Hart. But for the people of New York who deserve far more and far better than what some in the ranks of their elected leadership are currently giving them.
Copyright: Marcelluscoalition.org
County approves new wells
By Elizabeth Skrapits (Staff Writer)
Published: August 4, 2010
WILKES-BARRE – The Luzerne County Zoning Hearing Board on Tuesday night approved new natural gas wells and a facility for processing the gas, but added safety conditions.
Zoning hearing board members William Harris, Anthony Palischak and Chairman Lawrence Newman unanimously granted Encana Oil & Gas USA Inc. conditional use to drill five natural gas wells in an agricultural zone on the 4-P Realty property on Loyalville Road in Lake Township, as well as a natural gas processing facility that would include a compressor station and a radio tower.
Among the conditions the board imposed, Encana will have to determine whether the county’s emergency responders will be able to handle problems at the site, and to draw up a contingency plan to share with all concerned.
Encana will have to mitigate noise, light and dust at the site, as well as provide a traffic control plan, bond all county and municipal roads, and consider safety measures for school buses, such as having flagmen at bus stops.
The board also granted conditional approval on Encana’s request to drill three wells on the Kent North site at 208 State Route 118 in Fairmount Township, and two wells on the Kent South site at 27 State Route 487 in Fairmount Township.
The commissioners’ meeting room at the courthouse was jammed with people, many of whom expressed opposition to natural gas drilling.
Zoning hearing board Solicitor Stephen A. Menn repeatedly stressed that the state Oil and Gas Act does not allow local officials to regulate most aspects of natural gas well drilling, including how it is done and water use and protection.
“In what ways has the Oil and Gas Act tied your hands?” Factoryville resident Patrick Walker asked.
“Health, safety and welfare issues,” Menn said.
Like with methadone clinics and adult entertainment, zoning cannot exclude natural gas drilling, according to Menn.
“Drilling is a legal use. You have to put it somewhere,” Menn said.
The place people should seek change is Harrisburg, in laws passed by the General Assembly.
“I think it is an absolute horror, I think this is a version of fascism, that this power has been taken away from you,” Walker said.
Several residents questioned safety issues, such as the 6,800 additional trucks on the road throughout the well drilling process.
Lake-Lehman Transportation Coordinator Sandy Dobrowolski, speaking on her own behalf, expressed concern about the school buses being on the roads at the same time as the heavy traffic at the site.
Paul Ungvarsky, who lives on Loyalville Road about a mile from the 4-P property, asked if something could be done to ensure trucks don’t speed on the road. Encana Community Relations Adviser Wendy Wiedenbeck said it seemed like a reasonable request.
Ungvarsky also wanted to know what would happen if a property isn’t leased. He said his isn’t.
“If it’s unleased, we cannot drill under it,” Encana Operations Engineer Joel Fox said.
Linster added that Encana has “quite a bit of room to work with” on the 4-P site.
Mike Patrician of Clarks Summit, one of the 4-P property owners, spoke on Encana’s behalf, saying he had talked to five different companies at length about leasing.
“People are not all the same, gas companies are not all the same,” he said. “Encana has a stellar reputation in the industry.”
Gary Ide, who has leased his Lehman Township property, also defended Encana, stating that leaseholders were “extraordinarily impressed” with the company.
But Gene Stilp of Dauphin County, in referencing Patrician’s comment, said: “People are different, companies are different – frack water is pretty much the same.”
eskrapits@citizensvoice.com , 570-821-2072
View article here.
Copyright: The Citizens Voice
What They’re Saying: Responsible Marcellus Shale Development Allowing Family Farmers to Realize Their Dreams
- Marcellus production “will enable us all to keep our farms”
- “Farmers are making investments in their farms that were just dreams before the Marcellus Shale”
- Marcellus development pumping “hundreds of millions of dollars into the state’s economy”
Family farmers say Marcellus development “will enable us all to keep our farms”: “Some see it as a way to keep their farms, which have been in their families for generations. … Nor do they have concerns over the hydraulic fracturing process, which some environmentalists claim can contaminate water wells and pollute rivers and streams. “We’ve been stewards of the farms for years,” said Ward, a fourth-generation farm owner. McMurray’s family has owned its land since 1811, and Bird’s since 1821. “It will enable us all to keep our farms,” said Wright-Croft. Ward believes that farmers have the most to lose from gas drilling since they rely on private wells to water livestock as well as drink it themselves. “You’re not going to find anyone with more concerns about the water than us,” he said. (Observer-Reporter, 8/3/10)
Marcellus development pumping “hundreds of millions of dollars into the state’s economy”: “With lease payments ranging from $750 per acre to $3,600 per acre – and royalties set from 12.5 percent to 18.75 percent – the Marcellus Shale contracts Chesapeake has signed with local property owners has pumped hundreds of millions of dollars into the state’s economy. … The natural gas company presently employs 636 Mountain State residents, with plans to hire more local workers in the future once those potential employees receive proper training. Chesapeake has spent $46 million with West Virginia-based vendors so far this year, including $1 million in shops based in Marshall and Wetzel counties and several million dollars more with a company in St. Marys, W.Va. The company also donated more than $400,000 to community organizations within Marshall and Wetzel counties during the past two years, Chesapeake leaders note. (Wheeling News-Register, 8/1/10)
Marcellus bringing hope to family farmers: “As an accountant who works for many farmers in the northern tier, I have witnessed first-hand the financial stress this important industry has experienced for the past 30 years. In the past two years, I also see the hope that Marcellus Shale brings to these farm families. … Today, these farmers are making investments in their farms that were just dreams before the Marcellus Shale. Also because of these new investments by farmers, I see a rebuilding of the northern tier agriculture infrastructure that was at risk. (Daily Item, 7/28/10)
Marcellus production “good for everybody”; Helping counties “meet their bottom line”: “Marcellus Shale drilling is boosting local water sales and helping to push the Quemahoning pipeline close to its permitted capacity. Bruce Hottle, president of the Lincoln Township Municipal Authority, said the nonprofit has been selling close to 3 million gallons per month to Dallas-based Chief Oil & Gas. Drillers use several million gallons of water to “frack” each Marcellus Shale gas well. “It’s given us some decent cash flow we wouldn’t normally have,” Hottle said. “It’s probably doubled our water sales for the months of June and July.” … “This helps us get out of the hole sooner. It’s been good for everybody,” Hottle said. … As for the county, Commissioner Pamela Tokar-Ickes said the increased usage is helping them meet their bottom line. “The more water we sell the better for the Que pipeline project,” Tokar-Ickes said. “We hope it continues.” (Daily America, 7/30/10)
More new jobs on the way thanks to the Marcellus: “A partnership between Medico Industries Inc. and a South American company looks to tap into the Marcellus Shale natural gas drilling boom with the opening of a manufacturing facility in Hanover Township. … Medico Industries received a $500,000 low-interest loan through the Luzerne County Business Development Loan program to install and purchase machinery. The company is investing nearly $960,000 in the project. It’s estimated 20 jobs will be created. (Times-Leader, 7/31/10)
Marcellus-related jobs “another strong performer”: “The Pittsburgh region’s growth in all four of those sectors ranked between third and seventh best among the 40 largest regions in the country. Another strong performer was the natural resources and mining sector; although it only added 500 jobs, that was more than any region other than Houston, likely reflecting the impact of Marcellus Shale drilling. (Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 8/1/10)
Maintaining quality before drilling begins
By Elizabeth Skrapits (Staff Writer)
Published: August 2, 2010
JACKSON TWP. – Just as individual property owners are testing their drinking water wells before natural gas drilling starts, Pennsylvania American Water Co. has established a baseline to ensure nothing affects the quality of water the company provides to its thousands of customers.
After giving The Citizens’ Voice a tour of the Ceasetown Reservoir’s filtration plant last week, Pennsylvania American Water representatives explained what the company is doing to augment its water quality monitoring to prevent contamination from natural gas drilling.
Although no gas wells are planned near the Huntsville or Ceasetown reservoirs in Jackson and Lehman townships, Encana Oil & Gas USA Inc. has leased mineral rights to land close to both reservoirs and is preparing to drill an exploratory well in Lake Township, not far from the Lehman Township border.
Pennsylvania American Water Production Manager Mark Cross said the company has met with Encana and showed the gas company maps to indicate where the reservoirs’ watershed is and where future drilling activity could affect them.
“We had a lot of conversations with them to say this is a concern to us, and we need ongoing communication, and we need to know what your plans are,” he said.
Pennsylvania American Water also shared its watershed maps with the state Department of Environmental Protection, Cross said. Although there is no legal requirement to notify water companies when drilling permits are issued, DEP will take the watershed maps into consideration, and Pennsylvania American Water is also keeping up “ongoing dialogue” with the state agency, he said.
“Our focus is we want to know what’s going on out there, we want constant communication, we want to know what is in place out there, what their mitigation measures are, what spill control and response plans they have,” Cross said. “And it’s worked very well. They’ve been very cooperative, both DEP and Encana.”
‘Constantly monitored’
When people in Ashley, Conyngham Township, Courtdale, Edwardsville, Hanover Township, Hunlock Township, Larksville, Nanticoke, Plymouth, Plymouth Township, Pringle, Salem Township, Shickshinny and Wilkes-Barre City turn on their taps, the water probably comes from the Ceasetown Reservoir, which is fed by Pikes Creek.
Pennsylvania American Water’s 70,000 customers served by the Ceasetown Reservoir have their water treated at a facility in Jackson Township. A similar facility treats the water from the nearby Huntsville Reservoir, which serves about 29,000 customers. Huntsville serves Dallas, Kingston Township, Swoyersville, West Wyoming and Wyoming.
The “raw water” from the reservoir is piped into the facility in a 42-inch main, where chemicals are added to coagulate the small particles and make them easier to remove, Cross said.
The water then goes through a series of filters, which include irregularly shaped plastic beads that gather impurities, and layers of sand and gravel. The water is treated with chlorine to disinfect it and lime to adjust the pH level, then it is sent to a series of storage tanks and pump stations for distribution to customers.
Ceasetown’s facility handles a normal flow of 9 million gallons a day, Plant Supervisor Sean Sorber said. During droughts, Harveys Creek is used as an emergency source, but that hasn’t been necessary for about 10 years, Cross said.
“Ceasetown Reservoir is a very good source, very good quality,” he said.
Cross said the water is “constantly monitored” at the plant, and physical tests are done in its lab. A sink in the lab has a series of specialized faucets, each pouring water in a different stage of treatment. Every shift at the plant runs a minimum of two series of 15 tests – about 100 a day – Sorber said.
Because of impending natural gas drilling, Pennsylvania American Water instituted an additional set of parameters, Cross said.
Several months ago full baseline testing started at Pikes Creek, Harveys Creek, the Huntsville Reservoir in several locations, and the raw and treated water at the Huntsville and Ceasetown plants, he said. The water is tested at the plant and in the watershed for substances including volatile organic compounds, methane and total dissolved solids – extremely tiny particles of minerals or organic matter.
“We ran a full series of baseline tests – VOCs, metals, methane – on all of the sources in this Luzerne, Lackawanna and Susquehanna county area that are subject to any possible drilling,” Sorber said. “So we have a good baseline of what we currently have, and those tests will be run periodically also, as activity increases.”
Conductivity tests are one way to measure the amount of total dissolved solids, or TDSs. Changing levels of TDSs could signify a lot of things, including the water is being affected by natural gas drilling. Sorber took a sample of untreated water from one of the faucets and placed a probe in the plastic cup, then checked the meter. It was normal.
“If we see something jumping up, that will be an indication for us there’s something going on. It’s a very straightforward test,” he said.
Besides monitoring and testing, Pennsylvania American Water is active in trying to get Pennsylvania legislation changed, according to PAWC Communications Director Terry Maenza.
Two things the company would like to see changed are adding a requirement for drinking water utilities to be notified of any nearby natural gas drilling permit applications, and to have the buffer zone outside which drilling is allowed increased from 100 feet to 2,500 feet.
“We’re being as vigilant as we possibly can be, just to keep an eye on what’s proposed and before activity takes place, what safeguards are going to be in place,” Maenza said.
Contact the writer: eskrapits@citizensvoice.com, 570-821-2072
View article here.
Copyright: Citizens Voice
Marcellus Operators Continue Commitment to Emergency Response Preparation, Training
Working alongside the State Fire Academy, industry takes safety training to next level
Canonsburg, Pa. – As natural gas production from Pennsylvania’s portion of the Marcellus Shale – considered by experts to be the world’s second largest natural gas field once fully developed – continues to increase, helping to create tens of thousands of good-paying jobs across the Commonwealth, the industry is working closely with the emergency response community to ensure environmental and worker safety, a top industry-wide priority.
Launched in May, a partnership with the industry and the State Fire Academy will expand training that responders receive, adding new components targeted specifically at shale gas production. Trainings will cover a host of issues, from what to expect upon arriving at a well site, to how best to coordinate with on-site industry personnel.
“Safety is our industry’s top value, and we recognize the opportunity that the environmentally-safe and effective development of the Marcellus Shale’s clean-burning natural gas represents,” said Kathryn Klaber, president of the Marcellus Shale Coalition (MSC). “Preparing our first responders, and putting in place the best possible communication, training and educational tools is critical to ensuring that. And that’s exactly why we’re focused on proactively implementing commonsense practices that will benefit all Pennsylvanians.”
The industry’s engagement, education, preparation and outreach ranges from emergency responders to individual citizens and land owners, as well as with local and state government administrators and officials. The Pennsylvania State Fire Commissioner and Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency (PEMA), as well as the Lycoming County Gas Exploration Task Force, continue to work in tandem with the MSC to jointly develop training curriculum for the State’s Emergency Response Communities.
These comprehensive training plans will help give Pennsylvania’s first-responders the tools needed to effectively respond to the broad range of unlikely scenarios associated with the production of these clean-burning resources. For more information on this program and future training opportunities, visit www.osfc.state.pa.us, or call 717.248.1115, to register.
Copyright Marcellus Shale Coalition’s (MSC)