Archive for the ‘Pennsylvania Natural Gas Drilling’ Category

MSC president cites need for commonsense TDS regulations

Canonsburg, Pa. – The responsible use, treatment and stewardship of the Commonwealth’s water resources are among the most important considerations involved in the development of clean-burning natural gas from shale. As a result, the Marcellus Shale Coalition (MSC) – whose members represent 100 percent of the shale gas producers throughout Pennsylvania – counts among the industry’s major accomplishments the tremendous increase in recycling of shale water. Today’s meeting at Reserved Environmental Services facility features one example of the many facilities the industry is using to achieve its high recycle rates, reducing the amount of water used at each Marcellus well and decreasing the overall discharge volumes.

“Protecting the Commonwealth’s rivers, streams and tributaries remains a top priority for the MSC. New technologies allow our members to recycle on average nearly 60 percent of the produced water used in this tightly regulated process. And because of these technologies – which continue to advance by the day – some MSC members are recycling nearly 100 percent of their water,” said Kathryn Klaber, president and executive director of the MSC.

New regulations sought by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) call for an “end of pipe”, 500 milligrams per liter cap on the concentration of total dissolved solids (TDS) in the disposal of produced water. These proposed regulations, which are now pending before the Independent Regulatory Review Commission, could create a host of unintended consequences — as virtually no water treatment facilities across the Commonwealth could meet this threshold.

In fact, the Reserved Environmental Services facility is not currently capable of treating produced water at the discharge standards in the pending regulation, and will not have that capability before the effective date of the that regulation. For context, San Pellegrino Mineral Water’s TDS concentration is nearly twice the level of what these proposed regulations would require.

“As the safe and steady development of the Marcellus Shale continues to generate jobs, revenue and opportunity for the Commonwealth, the MSC stands ready, willing and eager – as always – to partner with DEP, the governor and the General Assembly to ensure this opportunity is seized upon in the safest, most beneficial manner for residents of the state and for our environment,” Klaber said. “Unfortunately, the new TDS rules represents a bump in that road and require more work to actually solve the TDS issues they are purported to address — but one we hope will be smoothed out along the path to an energy future to which we will continue to contribute, and of which we can be proud.”

READ MORE

• Gov. Rendell: “The technology in treating [produced] water is improving rapidly.” (CNBC’s Squawk Box, 6/9/10)
• Release: Marcellus Shale Coalition Releases the Facts on Flowback Water Treatment
• Study: Evaluation of High TDS Concentrations in the Monongahela River (Tetra Tech)
• Release: Environmental Firm Finds Marcellus Shale Drilling Activity Had Minimal Impact On Total Dissolved Solids

Copyright: Marcelluscoalition.org

By Joe McDonald (Staff Writer)
Published: June 10, 2010

In a ruling with potentially far-reaching consequences in Pennsylvania’s lucrative and burgeoning natural gas industry, a federal judge in Scranton on Wednesday ruled a Susquehanna County landowner can sue Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. on the grounds it fraudulently misled him into a signing a lease at a lowball rate.

The suit, filed by John Kropa, is one of several cases across the state filed by landowners who claim natural gas drilling companies fraudulently induced them to sign leases that locked them into $25-an-acre rates. In a modern-day version of the California gold rush, companies have been rushing to make deals with landowners across Pennsylvania so they can tap into natural gas from the Marcellus Shale, a geological formation that runs under most of the state.

U.S. District Court Judge James M. Munley, in an eight-page memorandum and order, noted Cabot’s agents told Mr. Kropa that the company “would never pay more than $25 per acre for the lease,” yet his “neighbors were apparently paid more than $25 an acre for leases on their property.”

“They relied on this statement and signed the lease, only to discover later that these statements were false and that others had signed far more lucrative deals” with Cabot, Judge Munley said.

Cabot’s representatives also warned that if Mr. Kropa did not sign a lease, then Cabot would take it anyway by negotiating leases with neighbors and “capture the gas,” leaving Mr. Kropa “without a lease or gas on their land,” the memorandum stated.

Mr. Kropa signed an oil and gas lease with the West Virginia company in 2006 and received a $1,275 payment for allowing the company to explore his 51-acre spread in Brooklyn Twp.

Mr. Kropa’s claims are not unique, especially for many of the leases signed before 2008, said attorney Stephen Saunders, a Scranton energy attorney.

“I think the fraud type claims will most likely be significant in cases where individual plaintiffs own larger tracts of land, say more than 100 acres, or situations where small contiguous landowners control significant areas in the aggregate hundreds of acres or more and are litigating as a group,” Mr. Saunders said.

If Mr. Kropa is successful in proving he was the victim of fraud, he could theoretically renegotiate a new lease, assuming the company still wants the gas under his land.

Judge Munley’s court order also dealt with another volatile issue in the gas drilling business: royalty payments. Mr. Kropa along with other landowers had claimed they were shortchanged by the drilling companies because they were deducing expenses from the royalties.

Judge Munley said that issue had been dealt with by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which ruled the royalty agreement was valid under Pennsylvania law.

Contact the writer: jmcdonald@timesshamrock.com

View this article here.

Copyright:  The Scranton Times-Tribune

Pa. American Water Co. wants state government to offer water supply protection.

By Steve Mocarskysmocarsky@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

Officials with the water company that owns two Back Mountain reservoirs want to see state action to better protect those drinking water sources from contamination related to natural gas drilling.

They also want the opportunity to have input into the permitting process for natural gas wells located near those reservoirs.

Terry Maenza, spokesman for Pennsylvania American Water Co., said there is no requirement that natural gas companies or any state agency notify water suppliers when well-drilling permit applications for land near water supplies are submitted to the state Department of Environmental Protection.

“We would like to see those laws and regulations revised so we can be notified and have a chance to express any comments or concerns while a permit is under review,” Maenza said.

Maenza’s comments follow the revelation on Monday that at least one property on the shore of the Huntsville Reservoir in Lehman Township, and an adjacent property, have been leased to EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc., which will begin exploratory drilling operations at a well in Fairmount Township in July and at a second in Lake Township in late summer or early fall.

Paul Siegel, who owns the three acres on the Huntsville shore, said on Monday there is language in his lease that allows him and his wife, Janet, to restrict any surface drilling on his land but would allow EnCana to drill horizontally underneath his property.

The couple’s son and daughter-in-law, Christopher and Maureen, own 10.88 acres bordered by Christopher’s parents’ land on the east and by Huntsville-Idetown Road on the west that is also leased to EnCana.

Maenza said there is a 500-foot buffer between other properties and the high-water point of the Huntsville and Ceasetown reservoirs in most areas, but some parcels of land were “grandfathered in” without buffers when Pennsylvania American bought the water system from PGW in 1996.

As far as allowing a gas company to drill underneath the reservoirs, Maenza said it “would depend on what the driller was proposing and who owns the land. I’m not sure how far (down) our rights extend under the reservoirs,” he said.

Maenza said Pennsylvania American started water sampling and visual creek inspections about two weeks ago “so we can get some baseline data before the drilling begins.”

Huntsville Reservoir provides water for about 30,000 people living in Dallas, Kingston Township., Swoyersville, Wyoming and West Wyoming. Ceasetown Reservoir provides water to about 70,000 people in Ashley, Courtdale, Edwardsville, Larksville, Nanticoke, Plymouth, Pringle, Shickshinny, the townships of Conyngham, Hanover, Hunlock, Newport and Plymouth, and portions of the city of Wilkes-Barre.

Wyoming Mayor Robert Boyer said he’d like to learn more about the drilling process, given that his town receives water from the Huntsville Reservoir.

“There is a potential for environmental concerns. If we drill for oil a mile under the ocean floor and we don’t have a plan in place to deal with a catastrophic event like we had off the Gulf Coast, it makes sense that we want to have environmental protections in place before we start drilling here. Don’t put the cart before the horse,” Boyd said.

Maenza noted that state Sen. Lisa Baker, R-Lehman Township, is working on legislation to protect water sources.

In order to protect aquifers and determine any adverse consequences attributable to drilling, one bill would require testing at three times – before drilling, at the completion of drilling and six months afterward – at three different depths.

A second bill would rule out drilling at sites too close to drinking water sources such as reservoirs.

A third bill would require DEP to ensure that the operators of wastewater treatment facilities are properly trained and sufficiently monitored to lessen the chances of human error creating a major problem.

Jennifer Wilson, Baker’s chief of staff, said specifics on the proposed bills, such as minimum distances from aquifers, are still being worked out.

Although EnCana has obtained a drilling permit for a site in Lehman Township about midway between Harveys Lake and Huntsville Reservoir, Wendy Wiedenbeck, public and community relations adviser for EnCana, said the company has not yet put together a full development program for drilling in Luzerne County should production at wells in Fairmount and Lake townships prove successful.

She did say the company is starting to look at additional potential drilling locations in the county.

As for company policies on proximity of drilling to water resources, she said the company naturally abides by the minimum setbacks set by states. But in considering additional setback distances, she said each potential drill location is unique and is assessed individually.

“We would take the same thoughtful, measured approach to any future operations as we have with our first two wells,” Wiedenbeck said.

Steve Mocarsky, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7311.

Copyright: Times Leader

By Steve Mocarsky smocarsky@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

 LEHMAN TWP. – Back Mountain residents and local legislators knew parcels of land leased to natural gas companies for exploration were close to two major water sources – the Huntsville and Ceasetown reservoirs, but some had no idea just how close.

There is at least one parcel of leased land on the shoreline of the Huntsville Reservoir, and another parcel just a few hundred feet from the shoreline, The Times Leader learned on Monday.

The discovery was made by title searcher Eric Gustitus, of Exeter, and verified by the newspaper through a Luzerne County property records check.

“I was doing a title search on property next to Penn State Lehman and I came across a gas lease on land close to the reservoir. I was shocked,” Gustitus said, explaining that he heard local activists expressing concerns about potential gas well sites being within a mile or two of water sources.

Gustitus located a 3.72-acre property on the shoreline of the reservoir owned by Paul and Janet Siegel, and an adjacent 10.88-acre property to the west owned by their son, Christopher Siegel, and his wife, Maureen.

“Oh my God, am I concerned,” said state Rep. Phyllis Mundy, D-Kingston, when told of the proximity of the leased land to the reservoir.

“I’m very concerned about the potential for drilling so close to the reservoir. If you’ve been following the news about Clearfield County and how frack water spewed from the well for 16 hours, you can see why potential for contamination of our water supply is of grave concern to me. And I know my constituents are concerned,” Mundy said.

A blowout at a natural-gas well in Penfield shot explosive gas and polluted water as high as 75 feet into the air last week before crews were able to tame it more than half a day later.

EnCana Oil & Gas plans to drill two exploratory wells this summer – one next month in Fairmount Township and another in Lake Township. After drilling an initial vertical well on a site, the company will drill horizontally, using a process called hydraulic fracturing (fracking) to release natural gas from the thick layer of shale about a mile beneath the earth’s surface.

Mundy is a co-sponsor of legislation that would create a 2,500-foot buffer around water sources such as the reservoirs to protect them from possible contamination from gas drilling-related activities.

The Huntsville and Ceasetown reservoirs serve as a water supply for Pennsylvania American Water Co., which serves many of Mundy’s constituents.

Mundy said Pennsylvania American President Kathy Pape had expressed concerns to her about water contamination.

Pape said on Monday she is working with Mundy to prepare testimony for the state Public Utility Commission on Marcellus Shale drilling.

Harveys Lake resident Michelle Boice, a member of the Gas Drilling Awareness Coalition and a commentator on environmental issues related to gas drilling at local meetings, said allowing any kind of gas drilling operations so close to the reservoir is “beyond any kind of reasoning., and it goes to show there are no rules or protections in place for the people.”

Dr. Tom Jiunta, a founding member of the coalition, said it’s “insane how close they are with these leases” to water sources.

Paul Siegel said he’s just as concerned as his neighbors about the potential for reservoir contamination, and that’s why there’s a protective clause in his lease with EnCana. “We have the right not to let them on our land, and we wouldn’t do that because we want to live here,” he said.

Siegel said he agreed to lease the land because he got the impression that everyone around him was signing gas leases.

“When everyone around you is signing, it gets kind of like a mad rush. So, if they’re going to be drilling next to us, and they’re going to be down there anyway, we said we don’t mind if they go under us,” Siegel said.

Christopher and Maureen Siegel could not be reached for comment. Neither could EnCana spokeswoman Wendy Wiedenbeck.

To view this article, click here.

Copyright: The Times Leader

The order against EOG Resources Inc. will remain in place until DEP can finish its investigation.

MARC LEVY Associated Press Writer

HARRISBURG — Pennsylvania regulators halted work Monday at dozens of unfinished natural gas wells being drilled by the company whose out-of-control well spewed out explosive gas and polluted water for 16 hours last week.

The order against Houston-based EOG Resources Inc. will remain in place until the Department of Environmental Protection can finish its investigation and until after the company makes whatever changes may be needed, Gov. Ed Rendell said.

The order stops EOG from drilling and hydraulically fracturing wells. It affects about 70 unfinished EOG wells into the gas-rich Marcellus Shale formation.

Another concern was the apparently bungled attempts to notify the right emergency-response officials about the accident. Fines are likely, said Environmental Protection Secretary John Hanger.

Nobody was hurt in Thursday’s blowout in a heavily forested section of north-central Pennsylvania.

The accident shot highly pressurized gas and wastewater as high as 75 feet. The gas never caught fire, but state officials had worried about an explosion and ordered electrical service to the area cut before specialists secured the well at about noon Friday.

About 35,000 gallons of wastewater have been pumped into holding tanks so far, the company said.

Monitors in a nearby spring show signs of pollution, although Hanger said the spring is in such a rural area that it is not viewed as a public health hazard. Officials say they have detected no pollution in larger waterways that feed public water supplies.

The state says the company is cooperating and is supportive of the stop-work order.

Gary L. Smith, vice president and general manager of EOG’s Pittsburgh office, said the company regrets the accident and would continue to work with Pennsylvania officials.

“After the investigations are complete, we will carefully review the findings with the goal of enhancing our practices,” Smith said.

“When all outstanding issues are resolved, we look forward to resuming full operations in Pennsylvania,” Smith added.

DEP officials said the well’s blowout preventer failed, and they were investigating whether the failed equipment was the primary cause.

A blowout preventer is a series of valves that sit atop a well and allow workers to control the pressure inside.

Hanger and EOG said the blowout preventer had been tested successfully by the company on Wednesday morning.

Copyright: Times Leader

VICKI SMITH Associated Press Writer
Published: June 7, 2010

MORGANTOWN, W.Va. (AP) — A crew drilling a natural gas well through an abandoned coal mine in West Virginia’s Northern Panhandle hit a pocket of methane gas that ignited, triggering an explosion that burned seven workers, state and company officials said Monday.

The blast created a column of flame that was initially at least 70 feet high, but the rig operator said the site was secure and the fire was about 40 feet high by late morning.

A team from Texas-based Wild Well Control, a company that specializes in rig fires, will decide whether to let the methane burn or try to extinguish the flames, said Kristi Gittins of Dallas,Texas-based Chief Oil and Natural Gas.

The explosion occurred about 1:30 a.m. in a rural area outside Moundsville, about 55 miles southwest of Pittsburgh, and presents no danger to any structures or people, said Bill Hendershot, an inspector with the state Department of Environmental Protection’s Office of Oil and Gas.

The operation was less than a week old: DEP records show a permit was issued June 2 to AB Resources PA LLC of Brecksville, Ohio.

Gittins said AB Resources is the operator of the well, while Chief has a “participation interest.” It is Chief’s responsibility to drill and complete the well, she said.

Chief’s site contractor, Union Drilling of Buckhannon, had drilled the first 1,000 feet of a second well on the property and was preparing to install surface casing when crews apparently hit and ignited the methane, she said.

Crews had drilled through the abandoned Consol Energy mine before without incident, she said.

Methane is a known risk when working near old mines, and the company typically takes a variety of precautions, including venting systems. Gittins could not immediately say what precautions were in place at this site.

“Luckily, our response team got there quickly, secured the area and evacuated the workers,” she said. “From all appearances, there weren’t any life-threatening injuries, so that’s a good thing.”

The seven workers were taken the West Penn Burn Center in Pittsburgh and were in fair condition, a hospital spokeswoman said.

Five were employed by Union and two worked for BJ Services Co. of Houston, Texas, said Jeff Funke, area director of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s Charleston office.

A spokesman for Union in Fort Worth, Texas, did not immediately return a telephone message.

The BJ Services workers were among four that had just arrived on site to place the casing, said Gary Flaharty, a spokesman for the parent company, Baker Hughes Inc. of Houston. The crew runs a safety check at the start of each shift and was just preparing to do that when the blast occurred.

Flaharty could not provide any details about the injured employees but said they’re being treated for burns and are expected to survive.

Funke said OSHA learned of the accident shortly after 8 a.m., and two investigators were being dispatched. However, they cannot enter the site and begin work until the fire is out, he said.

OSHA created a program to deal with gas drilling in the vast Marcellus shale fields about five years ago and has been proactively inspecting sites to ensure compliance with safety regulations, he said. The gas reserve is about the size of Greece and lies more than a mile beneath New York, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Ohio.

OSHA knew there would be a lot of drilling in West Virginia and Pennsylvania, “and we did our best to get out in front of that curve,” Funke said. “So we’re well-equipped to respond to this.”

About 98 percent of the region’s drilling now involves Marcellus shale, he said.

Gittins, the spokeswoman for Chief, confirmed the company was tapping into the Marcellus reserves. The company has drilled about 75 Marcellus wells in West Virginia and Pennsylvania so far, she said, with about 15 of them in West Virginia.

This was the company’s first major accident, she said.

However, it’s the latest in a string of accidents related to the rapidly growing pursuit of Marcellus gas.

In Pennsylvania, environmental regulators are investigating what caused another well to spew explosive gas and polluted water for about 16 hours last week until it was brought under control.

A crew of eight was evacuated from the Clearfield County site Thursday, but no one was injured. That accident involved EOG Resources Inc. of Houston.

Copyright:  The Scranton Times-Tribune

STEVE MOCARSKY smocarsky@timesleader.com

An attorney and a gas company land man warn that attractive lease offers from energy companies might not always be as generous as they seem.

Kit Akers, lead land man for new ventures at EnCana Oil & Gas, said other natural gas companies could come in throwing around relatively large bonus money offers to Luzerne County landowners if EnCana’s exploratory drilling is successful in Fairmount and Lake townships.

“Sometimes people get blinded by bonus money and aren’t always thinking about protecting themselves in the long run,” Akers said.

Luzerne County landowners might be experiencing bonus envy, considering that gas companies in Susquehanna and Bradford counties are offering $5,000 to $6,000 per-acre bonuses for drilling rights leases while EnCana is offering $2,500.

But Akers said the value of drilling rights in Luzerne County will increase if EnCana’s exploratory drilling is successful.

“Just the very fact that (EnCana’s acquiring state) permitting for the wells made the area more attractive to competition; that alone increases the potential value,” Akers said.

But Akers said landowners should consider more than just the bonuses and royalties offered in exchange for drilling rights.

“The WhitMar (a company EnCana has purchased leases from) lease form is very friendly to landowners. The lease is 14 pages long and loaded with surface protections, generous well location fees and other benefits to landowners. Other leases can be as short as two pages and include none of these protections. People sometimes get blinded by the money offered on the front end for a lease that is not worth as much to them,” Akers said.

Garry Taroli, an attorney with the Wilkes-Barre law firm Rosenn Jenkins & Greenwald, has been representing landowners in lease negotiations for about three years.

“The leases have become more friendly to property owners. With competition comes more benefits from the property owners’ point of view,” he said.

Many newer leases require minimum setbacks from structures and water sources, extra payments for damaged timber, reimbursements for harm to water or land and testing of water before, during and after drilling activities – paid for by the gas company, Taroli said.

Taroli advised that landowners at least have a lease reviewed by an attorney before signing it.

Some leases he’s seen contain language that could be a headache for landowners. While most leases set specific time limits for drilling, one lease he saw allowed a gas company to drill “for so long as gas could have been produced on the property.”

That term, Taroli said, “could be until doomsday.”

Jeffrey Nepa, an attorney with Nepa & McGraw in Carbondale and Clifford, said he’s happy to see property owners communicating on Internet forums to try to stay informed about lease issues.

“It’s nice to see people pooling their resources together to battle against the gas companies,” Nepa said.

“We live in the age of information. … We see that the gas companies are controlling the information. And a lot of times we see them put out misinformation. But at the end of the day, it comes down to caveat emptor – buyer beware.”

Steve Mocarsky, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7311.

Copyright: Times Leader

EnCana is currently signing standard leases giving Luzerne County landowners $2,500-per-acre bonuses.

STEVE MOCARSKY smocarsky@timesleader.com

The value of land leases with natural gas drilling companies has been climbing in counties to the north, but whether that happens in Luzerne County will depend on the results of exploratory drilling scheduled to begin this summer.

Natural gas exploration companies are now offering leases in Susquehanna and Bradford counties with up-front per-acre bonuses in the $5,000 to $6,000 range and royalties as high as 20 percent, said Garry Taroli, an attorney with Rosenn Jenkins & Greenwald representing area landowners.

Late last month, natural gas producer Williams Companies bought drilling rights to 42,000 net acres in Susquehanna County from Alta Resources for $501 million, placing the lease value on that land at nearly $12,000 per acre.

So people like Edward Buda, who owns land in Fairmount Township on which the first natural gas well in Luzerne County will be drilled in July, might be feeling some lessor’s remorse, given that they agreed to comparatively paltry up-front bonuses for the first two years of the lease term.

When Buda, 75, of Ross Township and his late brother and sister-in-law were in negotiations with WhitMar Exploration Co. early last year, they, like many others, agreed to bonus payments of $12.50 per acre each year for the first two years of the lease. The bonus increases to $2,500 for the third year.

However, if drilling begins on or under a landowner’s property before an anniversary date of the lease, any bonus payments for subsequent years become null and void and the royalty provision of the lease kicks in. So, if the drilling that is to begin next month on Buda’s property is successful, he likely won’t ever see that $2,500-per-acre bonus but will receive much larger royalty payments.

Since Buda’s lease was negotiated, WhitMar sold most of the company’s interest in the leases to EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc.

EnCana is currently signing standard leases giving Luzerne County landowners $2,500-per-acre bonuses – $1,000 the first year of the lease and $1,500 the second year, according to EnCana’s Group Lead for Land (New Ventures) Kit Akers.

Some landowners who signed the same type of deal with WhitMar as Buda believe they’ve been treated fairly.

Michael Giamber, 57, of Fairmount Township, lives about 2 miles from the Buda drill pad. While the Budas negotiated their lease on their own, Giamber joined a consortium of landowners who negotiated a deal with WhitMar in 2008 for bonuses of $12.50 per acre each year for the first two years of the lease, $2,500 per acre for the third year, and a 20-percent royalty on all gas produced.

“It was in the middle of a recession and leasing had pretty much stopped except in Dimock. We essentially partnered with WhitMar,” Giamber said.

In exchange for landowners accepting the initially small incremental bonus payment arrangement, WhitMar promised to do seismic testing of the leased land and partner with a company that would handle the drilling and secure permits for one to three exploratory wells in the county within two years.

“I signed on not because of the bonus, but because of the 20-percent royalty and because if they did not drill one to three wells after two years, we’d be free agents again,” able to renegotiate for better terms, Giamber said. “Because we were in a recession, what did we have to lose?”

“A lot of older people would rather more up-front money, and I can appreciate their position,” Giamber said.

Jeffrey Nepa, an attorney with Nepa & McGraw in Carbondale and Clifford, believes people who signed leases early for smaller bonuses were either “more desperate and needed money or were misinformed about what the extent of (drilling in the Marcellus Shale) was. Some people have had buyer’s remorse, so to speak, regretful that they signed and wanting to get out,” Nepa said.

Nepa said he’s seen bonus money increase, dip back down, “and now it’s creeping back up again. And it appears that landowners “who held out, so to speak, are the ones that are rewarded with the largest contracts. In the Barnett Shale (in Texas), I’ve heard of property owners getting in excess of $20,000 per acre, and they were the ones who held out.”

Gas companies normally drill in 640-acre blocks of land. So people with a larger tract of land are better off holding out for better lease terms, Nepa said.

On the other hand, those who signed leases earlier are now the ones who will see royalty payments kick in much sooner than anyone else, because they will be the first to have wells drilled, said Robert Schneider, 39, of Fleetville, Lackawanna County.

Schneider joined a landowner consortium that negotiated leases with a $2,100 bonus and an 18-percent royalty in 2008 with Exco Resources, and he’s glad he didn’t hold out for more.

“Two years have gone by and I have three years left. … There’s a risk if you wait,” Schneider said, speculating that implementation of more rigorous and costly government permitting requirements, the establishment of a severance tax or finding insufficient or no gas in his area are all reasons that companies might pull out and stop leasing.

EnCana’s Akers backed up what Giamber and Schneider had to say. “People who leased earlier put themselves in a position to most likely have their land drilled earlier,” she said.

And Akers said, if WhitMar had not been able to secure leases at relatively low cost to the company, exploration in Luzerne County might not have begun as soon as it has.

“Because these people leased early to WhitMar, WhitMar was able to build a large position of leases that allowed for horizontal drilling. That’s what got a company like EnCana interested in coming to Luzerne County. If we had not seen a consolidated lease position, it’s unlikely WhitMar would have gotten a company like EnCana to come in … It was possible that the $12.50 offer was the only offer those people would ever get,” she said.

Akers also believes that the reason landowners in Susquehanna and Bradford counties are being offered much higher bonuses is because hundreds of wells have been drilled there and natural gas extraction has proven successful.

“Luzerne County, on the other hand, is really on the frontier. There’s no way to know if shale within a geographic region will produce any gas or enough gas to make drilling profitable without actually drilling wells. There have been no wells drilled in Luzerne County, so that’s the reason why there’s a difference in lease prices between Luzerne County and other counties,” Akers said.

If wells on Buda’s land and a site in Lake Township don’t produce any gas or at least enough of it to make drilling there worthwhile, land lease values in Luzerne County could drop to zero, Akers said.

If the wells do produce significant amounts of gas, however, competition for drilling rights will definitely heat up, Akers said, and with it the price.

Steve Mocarsky, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7311.

Copyright: Times Leader

MARC LEVY Associated Press Writer

HARRISBURG — State environmental regulators worked Sunday to get to the bottom of what caused a natural-gas well to spew explosive gas and polluted water for 16 hours last week before it could be brought under control.

Neil Weaver, spokesman for the Department of Environmental Protection, blamed a failure on the well’s blowout preventer, a series of valves that sit atop a well and allow workers to control the pressure inside. Investigators are trying to figure out what caused the malfunction.

The blowout is the latest in a string of accidents connected by regulators to the rapidly growing pursuit of the rich Marcellus Shale gas reserve that lies beneath much of Pennsylvania.

It seems likely the Pennsylvania blowout will enter the debate in the Capitol, where legislators are battling over the merits of an extraction tax and tighter regulations on an industry that has spent several billion dollars and drilled more than 1,000 wells in Pennsylvania in just a couple years.

State Rep. David Levdansky, D-Allegheny, said such oil problems could bring increased interest in a moratorium on leasing public land for gas drilling and a severance tax that could largely fund existing environmental protection and cleanup programs. Levdansky is a leading environmental advocate.

Weaver declined to discuss whether investigators have found anything so far or whether well driller EOG Resources Inc. of Houston committed any violations that could lead to fines or any other penalties.

An EOG spokeswoman said Sunday the investigation into the cause is ongoing, and the company had no light to shed on the blowout.

Crews evacuated the site Thursday night and didn’t regain control over it until just past noon Friday. No one was injured, the gas didn’t explode and polluted water didn’t reach a nearby waterway, officials said.

The blowout sent highly pressurized gas and polluted water 75 feet into the air. Huge tanks were required to cart off chemical- and mineral-laced water collected on the grounds of the private hunting club where the well had just been drilled.

Copyright: Times Leader