Archive for the ‘Pennsylvania Natural Gas Drilling’ Category

Economist from M&T Bank predicts gas drilling will give area “a huge shot in the arm” in next decade.

By Ron Bartizekrbartizek@timesleader.com
Business & Consumer / City Editor

WILKES-BARRE – The Marcellus Shale gas play will be “a game changer” for Northeastern Pennsylvania, bringing a “huge economic injection” and making life here very different a decade from now, an economist said Wednesday.

James E. Thorne, Ph.D., chief investment officer of equities for M&T Bank, told members of the Greater Wilkes-Barre Chamber of Business and Industry during a luncheon talk at the Westmoreland Club that the region will get “a huge shot in the arm” from natural gas drilling. “The economic forecast is very bright.”

Gas drilling has boomed in the Northern Tier of Pennsylvania since horizontal drilling technologies using pressurized liquids have made it financially feasible for companies to drill into the Marcellus Shale, a layer of gas-laden rock that runs about a mile underground from New York into Virginia.

Many landowners in Luzerne County have entered into leases with drillers, but no wells are yet operating in the county.

Thorne said the future direction of the national economy is less clear while emphasizing that the United States has a history of adapting to changing times. He cited the push into science and technology in the late 1950s after the Soviet Union launched the Sputnik satellite as an example.

As at that time, “there’s got to be a new industry created” that the U.S. can lead the world in, Thorne said, suggesting “green” technology may be the logical successor to space exploration and the Internet. The current economic problems, he said, were made worse by a diversion of resources to consumption and housing, which do not increase productivity.

Export-led, resources and infrastructure industries need to be the immediate focus, Thorne said, adding that additional government spending to rebuild and repair aging domestic

The present weakness of the dollar is necessary, Thorne said, to give American exporters the opportunity to expand their markets. But in the long run “the solution is to create inflation.

“The dollar is a reflection of economic growth; we benefit from a weak dollar.”

“We’re going to enter an adjustment period,” Thorne said, that could be several years long. But he said there’s reason to be optimistic about the outcome.

“We’ve done this before. I’m hugely bullish on the American economy,” he said.

Copyright: Times Leader

Authorities allowed the company to resume work after corrective actions.

By Rory Sweeneyrsweeney@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

The state Department of Environmental Protection announced on Thursday that it has fined Cabot Oil and Gas $56,000 for three polluting spills at one of its natural gas drilling sites in Susquehanna County.

The fine comes a little more than a month after the spills, which all occurred within a week of each other at the Heitsman well in Dimock Township and totaled about 8,400 gallons of fluids. Some of the liquid, which was a mix of mostly water and a gel that facilitates the drilling process, drained into an adjacent wetlands and Stevens Creek.

“The department presented a number to us and we thought under the circumstances that it was appropriate and not something that we wanted to fight about,” said Ken Komoroski, Cabot spokesman. “We’re just going to move forward.”

Within a few days of the spill, DEP ordered Cabot to halt hydraulic fracturing – the process that caused the spills – and submit an engineering analysis about what went wrong and how it will be avoided in the future.

Cabot’s report said the failure was caused by pressure surges and that significant elevation differences between where the liquid was stored and where it was being pumped to contributed to the problem.

The report includes a list of corrective actions that Cabot has agreed to take, among them providing better containment and pressure-regulating valves for sites where elevation is a factor.

DEP approved the report on Oct. 16 and allowed Cabot to resume “fracking.” The process forces water, sand and a mix of chemicals into the rock layer that contains the gas, causing fractures that release the gas up the well.

Gas drilling has boomed in the Northern Tier since fracking and horizontal drilling technologies have made it financially feasible for companies to drill into the Marcellus Shale, a layer of gas-laden rock that runs about a mile underground from New York into Virginia.

Copyright: Times Leader

CAMILLE FIOTI Times Leader Correspondent

LEHMAN TWP. – Chris Miller of Jackson Road voiced concerns Monday about the effects of possible gas drilling in the township.

“I am not opposed to gas drilling,” he said told the township supervisors at their meeting. “I am concerned and vigilant about what gas drilling can do to our special community if we do not properly plan.”

He commended the board for passing the Growing Greener ordinance last year that was adopted to help preserve natural, open space in the township.

“Many of us who live here do so because this is a wonderful community,” Miller said. “Our kids can breathe fresh air. The water is clean. There is plenty of forest to hike and hunt in and streams to fish in,” he added.

Supervisor Ray Iwanoski said the board is also concerned; however, the state, not the township, has control over drilling. Drilling hasn’t started in the township, but a number of leases have been issued, Supervisor Dave Sutton said.

“I’m also not opposed to drilling,” Sutton said. “But the township’s initial concern is damage to the roads.” Large trucks hauling machinery and polluted water used in hydraulic fracturing – the type of drilling used to stimulate the release of natural gas from the Marcellus Shale – will take a toll on the township’s roads, Sutton added.

Iwanoski said the board plans to meet with representatives from Whit Mar, the Denver-based firm that has a hold on the area’s gas leases.

In another matter, Sutton addressed complaints made by several Oak Drive residents at last month’s meeting regarding the condition of their road. Sutton said the residents complained that their road is riddled with potholes and is dangerous to drive on.

“There was a lot of exaggeration at the last meeting,” he said. He said he tested the road on his way home from that meeting. “The road is very safe. It was very easy to drive.”

Iwanoski added the road didn’t qualify for a state grant to pave it. He said the road crew patched the potholes the day after the complaints were made.

Copyright: Times Leader

By Rory Sweeneyrsweeney@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

TUNKHANNOCK – As if responding to previous community criticism about a similar facility, company officials hoping to build a drilling-waste treatment plant near Meshoppen said Tuesday recycling water is part of their plans.

“It makes sense to reuse this water,” said Ron Schlicher, an engineer consulting for the treatment company. “The goal here is to strive for 100-percent reuse, so we don’t have to discharge.”

Wyoming Somerset Regional Water Resources Corp. is proposing a facility in Lemon Township in Wyoming County to treat water contaminated during natural-gas drilling in a process called hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking.”

To do so, it requires a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit from the state Department of Environmental Protection.

That process includes a period of public comment, for which the hearing at the Tunkhannock Middle School on Tuesday evening was held.

Wyoming Somerset is the second company to propose such a facility in Wyoming County. Two weeks ago, DEP held a similar hearing for North Branch Processing LLC, which wants to build a plant just outside Tunkhannock in Eaton Township to discharge up to 500,000 gallons daily of the treated waste into the Susquehanna River.

Citizens attending that hearing complained that the discharges could potentially harm the river’s ecology and suggested that the waste simply be recycled into other fracking jobs.

Wyoming Somerset’s proposal is to discharge up to 380,000 gallons daily into the Meshoppen Creek, but company officials said they hoped to sell it all back to drillers instead.

“The discharges need to be in place to make sure that the weather doesn’t have an adverse effect on operations of cleaning the water,” said Larry Mostoller, Wyoming Somerset’s president. “I’ll be willing to drink what we produce. I’ll be willing to drink what comes out of this plant, and you can hold me to that.”

That promise and the vague goal of full reuse didn’t sit well with the roughly 75 citizens who attended the hearing. Questioning everything from why the facility couldn’t guarantee zero discharges to its proposed site, residents came out squarely against the plan.

Many non-residents joined them, including two from Bucks County, one an environmental scientist and the other a lawyer, and a man from New Jersey.

Don Williams, a Susquehanna River advocate from Lycoming County, warned that cashing in on the gas-laden Marcellus Shale is “jeopardizing our land and our feature for the false promise of jobs” and money.

Of particular frustration for many were the unknown details about the plant’s design. Schlicher presented an overview of it, noting reverse-osmosis filters, evaporation tanks and a three-tiered output to provide drillers with water at various levels of treatment.

The water that could potentially be discharged would be “essentially meeting drinking water standards for most things,” Schlicher said, but not everything, including lead, aluminum and iron “because the surface water body can handle them,” he said.

Design specifics won’t be known until the second part of the application, when the company proposes how it will meet its discharge limits. That part likely won’t have a public hearing, DEP officials noted.

Those wishing to comment on the proposed facility may do so until Oct. 30 by contacting the DEP. The number for its Wilkes-Barre office is (570) 826-2511.

Copyright: Times Leader

Eileen Godin Times Leader Correspondent

LAKE TWP – Concerns over gas drilling and a nuisance property brought two different groups to Wednesday’s supervisors meeting.

Ron Kirkutis and others expressed concerns over possible air and water pollution caused by Marcellus Shale gas drilling.

Kirkutis said information he read revealed about 280 chemicals are used in the fluid the gas drilling companies use.

“Some chemicals are carcinogenic,” he said. “I have a newborn and a 3-year-old. What if that seeps into my well water?”

“I do not want to see a gas drilling operation going on next door,” he said.

Luzerne Conversation District member and Township Supervisor Amy Salansky said residents who lease their property should make sure the gas company is required to test the well water.

She also assured residents that no gas drilling permits have been issued in Lake Township.

Township Attorney Mark McNealis said the supervisors will not have much control over gas drilling.

“The supervisors do not oversee the zoning within the township. That falls under the Luzerne County zoning office, but talk to DEP (the state Department of Environmental Protection), talk to your agencies,” he said.

Also concerned with pollution, resident Leonard Ruotolo complained about a nuisance property.

Ruotolo along with residents Lewis and Edna Higgins, told the supervisors that William Harrison did not comply with the state DEP’s 45-day timeframe to clean up his property, and the situation is getting worst.

DEP issued a citation in August ordering Harrison to clean up three trash piles on his Tulip Road property.

The matter is now awaiting action by DEP’s compliance and legal teams.

McNealis said this is coming down to an enforcement matter. He said residents should contact the district attorney’s office and state Rep. Karen Boback, the county zoning office and the state police.

Copyright: Times Leader

Law will restrict gas wells to specific areas

By Rory Sweeneyrsweeney@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

There’s no natural-gas drilling in Dallas, but that’s not stopping the borough from deciding where it will allow drilling.

As part of the revision of its zoning ordinance, Dallas is adding provisions that would restrict sitting gas wells to areas zoned industrial, highway or business. It would also designate distance setbacks from residences, waterways, streets and wetlands.

The proactive stance is putting Dallas at the forefront of what could become a major issue as drilling in the Marcellus Shale increases.

“You’re talking about a very fundamental conflict between the municipal regulation of land use and the ability of landowner to access land rights,” said Stephen Rhoads, the president of the Pennsylvania Oil & Gas Association. “You could think of this in terms of taking.”

“Taking” is illegally blocking someone’s access to the point of essentially denying their rights. Eventually, it will find its way to court, Rhoads said, though he wouldn’t speculate on who would win.

At its meeting on Thursday, the borough’s planning commission recommended the borough council vote on the revisions.

“The main point is that we were already going through a revision … so we thought it would be proactive to include something that reflects what’s going on in the Back Mountain these days,” Borough Manager Tracey Carr said.

The ordinance would also require drillers to identify roads they plan to use, pay for an engineer to document the roads’ conditions and be responsible for maintenance and repair.

With a flurry of lease signings lately, gas drilling has become a hot topic in the county. Drillers are flocking to the area to tap the Marcellus Shale, a layer of gas-laden rock about a mile underground that stretches from New York to Virginia. Its huge size – and economic potential – has been known for years, but technology only recently caught up to access it.

Despite industry innovations such as horizontal drilling that allow wells to access gas pockets up to a mile away, Rhoads said having versatility in well sites makes “a difference because it depends how much surface area is put off limits. You can’t just put a well site on the edge of town and drill from one well site and get every possible molecule of gas.”

Carr said the provisions aren’t meant to keep drilling out of any areas, “just where would be most appropriate if it was to take place.”

Rhoads said such actions can harm landowners. “The geology will dictate where the well (should be) located – not zoning – and if there’s a conflict between zoning and geology, the geology loses,” he said. “You’re effectively telling me that my oil and gas property is worthless if you zone my surface property in such a way that I can’t gain access to it.”

On the scale of issues facing the industry – including access to water for gas extraction, disposal options for waste and a proposed state severance tax – Rhoads called zoning “a major issue.”

But for Carr and the borough she manages, it’s just being efficient and responsible. “This is actually a very small part of what we’re doing,” she said, noting that the borough’s consultant on the revision suggested adding the drilling provisions.

The proposed ordinance must go through a public hearing and likely won’t be addressed by the council until November or December, she said. There have been no complaints so far, she said, “but we haven’t had the public hearing yet, either.”

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader

Luzerne County property owners hope to have their own deal by year’s end.

By Rory Sweeneyrsweeney@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

Lease signing begins today for members of the Wyoming County Landowners group who have accepted a gas-drilling offer from Chesapeake Energy.

The signings could foreshadow what other local landowners are hoping comes to them soon. The South West Ross Township Property Group and Columbia County Land Owners Coalition confirmed on Friday that they, too, are in talks with Chesapeake.

The Columbia group, which represents roughly 80,000 acres in Columbia, Luzerne, Sullivan and Lycoming counties, hopes to complete a deal before the end of the year, according to an e-mail sent out to its membership.

The Ross Township group, which includes roughly 10,000 acres around Ross Township, is affiliated with the Columbia group, but also making its own discussions with Chesapeake, said Ken Long, a member of the group’s executive committee.

Group leaders expect monetary terms to be similar to the one Chesapeake offered to the Wyoming group: a five-year lease at 20-percent royalties, plus a $5,750-per-acre sign-up bonus. It includes a five-year option Chesapeake could exercise for another $5,750 per acre.

But other recent events with drillers locally could foreshadow what landowner hope to never see. The state Department of Environmental Protection issued a notice of violation to Cabot Oil and Gas Corp. for a gas spill earlier this week and ordered the company to cease hydraulic fracturing in Susquehanna County until it had completed a comprehensive engineering assessment and updated its pollution-prevention plans.

The company is currently drilling seven new wells in the county that will require fracking, which forces water, sand and chemicals into the gas-laden Marcellus Shale to fracture the rock and release the gas.

The company has 21 days to complete the assessment and 14 days to update the plan. Once it’s approved, the company will have 21 days to implement the plan.

The situation is one that landowners like the Wyoming group hope to avert with their in-depth leases. The group has been split alphabetically for this weekend’s signing. Those with surnames beginning with “A” through “L” should show up between 9 a.m. and 7 p.m. on Saturday at the American Legion Post 510 in the village of Black Walnut on U.S. Route 6 between Laceyville and Meshoppen. Everyone else is assigned to between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. on Sunday. Those who can’t make their assigned day may show up on the other one.

Landowners who can’t make either day should be receiving an e-mail with documents that need to be signed and mailed to Chesapeake. The $1,000-per-acre initial payment will be sent by mail.

On the Web

To sign up property for a gas lease: http://forms.askchesapeake.com/landowner

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader

MARC LEVY Associated Press Writer

HARRISBURG— Citing three recent chemical spills at one well site, Pennsylvania regulators said Friday they had ordered Cabot Oil and Gas Corp. to halt its use of a drilling technique that uses liquids to fracture rock and release natural gas.

The state Department of Environmental Protection’s order applies to eight of Cabot’s drilling sites, all in Susquehanna County in northeastern Pennsylvania.

The company, which received the order Thursday, voluntarily shut down its use of the drilling technique — called hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking” — at the spill-plagued site there earlier this week. It has seven other drilling sites that eventually will require fracking to complete.

“The department took this action because of our concern about Cabot’s current fracking process and to ensure that the environment in Susquehanna County is properly protected,” the DEP’s northcentral regional director, Robert Yowell, said in a statement.

Under the state’s order, Cabot must complete a number of engineering and safety tasks before it can resume its fracking process as it drills into the potentially lucrative Marcellus Shale formation.

Cabot spokesman Ken Komoroski said Friday that the company disagrees with some of the agency’s allegations in the order, but it is committed to completing the tasks required by the order.

Copyright: Times Leader

Landowners in Wyoming County get some good protections, attorney says.

By Rory Sweeneyrsweeney@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

The lease that Chesapeake Energy is offering to Wyoming County Landowners group members is clearly a compromise between landowners and the company, according to an experienced gas-law attorney, but includes “many of the protections that we like to see for landowners are built into this lease.”

Dale Tice, an attorney with Williamsport-based Greevy and Associates who has clients in the Wyoming group, characterized the wording in the lease offer as “very competitive with the leases we’ve seen.”

Tice, whose office has gained somewhat of an expertise in gas law since companies began descending on Lycoming County a few years ago, said he usually disapproves of a five-year re-leasing option being available to companies, but noted that it’s “understandable” why Chesapeake would want that because it’s leasing so much land that it will take years to explore the whole area.

He also said that the $20-per-year fee paid if a well is shut off to eliminate production during a bad market “is as good as they’re going to do.”

While Tice declined to identify negatives in the lease and cautioned that his comments shouldn’t be construed as legal advice, he noted several positives: including in-depth wording to limit production-unit sizes, termination of the lease on land that isn’t part of a production unit, the company’s responsibility to pay property-tax rollbacks on Clean and Green properties and mutual written agreement on placement for wells, pipelines and other infrastructure. Additionally, he said, the lease requires that all infrastructure sited on a property must be tied into gas production at the property.

“There’s always somewhat of a question there because, although the gas company and the landowner must mutually agree in writing as to the location, the gas companies always add some language that says lessors can’t be unreasonable” about siting infrastructure, he said.

Though there is no specific reference to siting waste-deposit wells on the properties, “sometimes,” he said, “if they (landowners) don’t give them (drilling companies) the right, they don’t need to take it out, so to speak.”

The lease is “clearly the product of extensive dialogue between the parties,” Tice said. “I think this does a good job of striking a compromise where the landowner has a lot of good protections worked into it.”

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader

The initial events polluted a wetland and caused a fish kill in Susquehanna County.

By Rory Sweeneyrsweeney@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

Cabot Oil and Gas has been issued a letter of violation for two liquid-gel spills last week at the company’s Heitsman natural-gas well pad in Susquehanna County, the state Department of Environmental Protection announced on Tuesday.

The spills of about 8,400 gallons, which polluted a wetland and caused a fish kill in Stevens Creek, were followed up by a third spill at the site on Tuesday morning, according to DEP spokesman Dan Spadoni.

A hose burst, according to DEP, and released about 420 gallons of the same lubricant. A catch basin retained most of it, Cabot spokesman Ken Komoroski said, but it’s unknown what happened to 10 gallons.

He said he was unaware of the spills causing any environmental damage, but acknowledged that a dam created to block the contaminant caused flow problems and that DEP noticed “the minnows downstream were distressed and/or swimming erratically.”

“We think that it’s important to residents that no contaminants from the spill have compromised Stevens Creek,” he said.

The spilled material, known as LGC-35, suspends sand in water to fracture rock in the gas-drilling process used in the Marcellus Shale region.

LGC-35 is a “potential carcinogen,” according to its Material Safety Data Sheet, and can cause eye, skin and respiratory irritation, along with “central nervous system effects,” such as dizziness and headaches.

Komoroski said the drilling contractor, Halliburton, has since revised the safety sheet to exclude the carcinogenic reference because the potential cancer-causing agent is a “potential contaminant” to the gel, not part of its formula. Halliburton told Cabot the contaminant wasn’t present in the spilled batches, but Cabot is performing its own testing to confirm that, Komoroski said.

He added that Cabot feels Halliburton should have been cited for the spill. Halliburton had flushed the wetlands with clean water and collected the effluent before the third spill, Spadoni said, and it won’t be known whether the land needs to be excavated until results from soil samples are announced. “I would anticipate that would be done fairly soon,” Spadoni said.

Cabot has 10 days to respond to the violation notice with how it plans to further clean the affected area and prevent future spills. DEP may assess a civil penalty in the case, for which Komoroski said Cabot would seek compensation from Halliburton.

Copyright: Times Leader