Posts Tagged ‘chairman’

By Elizabeth Skrapits (Staff Writer)
Published: August 4, 2010

WILKES-BARRE – The Luzerne County Zoning Hearing Board on Tuesday night approved new natural gas wells and a facility for processing the gas, but added safety conditions.

Zoning hearing board members William Harris, Anthony Palischak and Chairman Lawrence Newman unanimously granted Encana Oil & Gas USA Inc. conditional use to drill five natural gas wells in an agricultural zone on the 4-P Realty property on Loyalville Road in Lake Township, as well as a natural gas processing facility that would include a compressor station and a radio tower.

Among the conditions the board imposed, Encana will have to determine whether the county’s emergency responders will be able to handle problems at the site, and to draw up a contingency plan to share with all concerned.

Encana will have to mitigate noise, light and dust at the site, as well as provide a traffic control plan, bond all county and municipal roads, and consider safety measures for school buses, such as having flagmen at bus stops.

The board also granted conditional approval on Encana’s request to drill three wells on the Kent North site at 208 State Route 118 in Fairmount Township, and two wells on the Kent South site at 27 State Route 487 in Fairmount Township.

The commissioners’ meeting room at the courthouse was jammed with people, many of whom expressed opposition to natural gas drilling.

Zoning hearing board Solicitor Stephen A. Menn repeatedly stressed that the state Oil and Gas Act does not allow local officials to regulate most aspects of natural gas well drilling, including how it is done and water use and protection.

“In what ways has the Oil and Gas Act tied your hands?” Factoryville resident Patrick Walker asked.

“Health, safety and welfare issues,” Menn said.

Like with methadone clinics and adult entertainment, zoning cannot exclude natural gas drilling, according to Menn.

“Drilling is a legal use. You have to put it somewhere,” Menn said.

The place people should seek change is Harrisburg, in laws passed by the General Assembly.

“I think it is an absolute horror, I think this is a version of fascism, that this power has been taken away from you,” Walker said.

Several residents questioned safety issues, such as the 6,800 additional trucks on the road throughout the well drilling process.

Lake-Lehman Transportation Coordinator Sandy Dobrowolski, speaking on her own behalf, expressed concern about the school buses being on the roads at the same time as the heavy traffic at the site.

Paul Ungvarsky, who lives on Loyalville Road about a mile from the 4-P property, asked if something could be done to ensure trucks don’t speed on the road. Encana Community Relations Adviser Wendy Wiedenbeck said it seemed like a reasonable request.

Ungvarsky also wanted to know what would happen if a property isn’t leased. He said his isn’t.

“If it’s unleased, we cannot drill under it,” Encana Operations Engineer Joel Fox said.

Linster added that Encana has “quite a bit of room to work with” on the 4-P site.

Mike Patrician of Clarks Summit, one of the 4-P property owners, spoke on Encana’s behalf, saying he had talked to five different companies at length about leasing.

“People are not all the same, gas companies are not all the same,” he said. “Encana has a stellar reputation in the industry.”

Gary Ide, who has leased his Lehman Township property, also defended Encana, stating that leaseholders were “extraordinarily impressed” with the company.

But Gene Stilp of Dauphin County, in referencing Patrician’s comment, said: “People are different, companies are different – frack water is pretty much the same.”

eskrapits@citizensvoice.com , 570-821-2072

View article here.

Copyright:  The Citizens Voice 

Callahan brings more than a decade of energy experience to the job, lauded by MSC chairman and president as a “key collaborator” in engaging elected officials and partners

CANONSBURG, Pa. – As Marcellus Shale employers continue to work with policymakers on a comprehensive framework for taking full advantage of the myriad opportunities that natural gas exploration make possible, the Marcellus Shale Coalition (MSC) today announced the addition of a key member to its staff who will be among those serving on the frontlines of that critical and ongoing effort.

Starting this week, David Callahan will serve as MSC’s vice president, a position dually based in Harrisburg and Canonsburg, Pa., but one that will take Mr. Callahan all across the multistate Marcellus region. A native Pennsylvanian, Mr. Callahan has 20 years of experience in the field of government relations, a majority spent representing a number of energy interests, including the Pennsylvania Gas Association (now the Energy Association of Pennsylvania) and the Associated Petroleum Industries of Pennsylvania.

“The safe and steady development of natural gas from the Marcellus Shale represents a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for shared prosperity across the entire Marcellus,” said Kathryn Klaber, president and executive director of the MSC. “But that vision of the future that will only be realized through engagement and cooperation with policymakers and elected leaders in the region. David’s experience working collaboratively with legislators and regulators alike will serve our members well, and ultimately benefit everyone by advancing a strategy that generates jobs and revenues in the short-term, and the promise of long-term energy security and affordability beyond that.”

“The industry continues to create tens of thousands of jobs each and every year all across the multistate Marcellus region, our membership has continued to expand as well – and so has our strength and expertise,” said Ray Walker, Jr., chairman of the MSC and a senior vice-president for Range Resources. “The addition of David to the growing MSC staff represents a key step forward for this Coalition, and an important resource in our campaign to educate the public about the historic opportunities of the Marcellus, while educating policymakers on the imperative of keeping the Marcellus ahead of the competition curve in the ongoing and aggressive race for talent, equipment and investment.”

Mr. Callahan, currently a resident of Mechanicsburg, Pa., earned his undergraduate degree from Indiana University of Pennsylvania, and his master’s from Syracuse University’s Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs.

Copyright: Marcelluscoalition.org

Legislators want adequate tax share for municipalities fiscally hit by gas drilling.

STEVE MOCARSKY smocarsky@timesleader.com

Much legislation has been written recently to address concerns about natural gas drilling into Pennsylvania’s Marcellus Shale, but little has been signed into law.

And one issue, it seems has been overshadowing and holding up action on all the others: a state severance tax on natural gas extraction.

Several bills addressing a severance tax have been put forward by state legislators, and Gov. Ed Rendell also has proposed implementing such a tax.

“The biggest concern for legislators is that an adequate portion of a severance tax would come back to local governments that are financially impacted by drilling activities,” said Adam Pankake, representing Sen. Gene Yaw, a Republican from Lycoming County and one of the few legislators to have a Marcellus-related bill he sponsored signed into law.

Senate Bill 325, sponsored by Rep. Anthony Melio, D-Levittown, didn’t muster much support in the House because it authorized an 8-percent severance tax, all of which would go to the state’s General Fund, Pankake said.

State Sen. Raphael Musto, D-Pittston Township, proposed a severance tax plan in Senate Bill 905 that mirrors Rendell’s plan, directing all proceeds of a 5-percent tax and a 4.7-cent charge on every 1,000 cubic feet of gas extracted into the General Fund.

A bill by state Rep. Bud George, chairman of the House Environmental Resources and Energy Committee, would send only 60 percent of a 5-percent tax to the General Fund.

The remainder would be divvied up, sending 15 percent to the Environmental Stewardship Fund; 9 percent split evenly between counties and municipalities in which wells are drilled; 5 percent to the Liquid Fuels Tax Fund; 4 percent split evenly between the Game and Fish and Boat commissions; 4 percent to the Hazardous Sites Cleanup Fund; and 3 percent to a program to help low-income residents with heating bills.

A bill sponsored by Sen. Andrew Dinniman, D-West Chester, would send half of a 5-percent severance tax to the General Fund. Another 44 percent would be split evenly between the Environmental Stewardship Fund and municipalities in which a well was drilled; the remaining 6 percent would be split between the Game and Fish and Boat commissions.

Legislators are also considering severance tax models used in other states, such as a phase-in approach used in Arkansas, Pankake said.

Marcellus-drilling industry advocates describe it as a fledgling industry that a severance tax could cripple because of the financial resources needed to build a pipeline infrastructure where none previously existed.

Matthew Maciorski, spokesman for state Rep. George, D-Clearfield County, said severance tax legislative proposals have been “coming in fast and furious. Everyone has their own take on how the revenue should be divided.”

Maciorski said Marcellus Shale issues are “very complicated and integral to the whole budget debate.”

Some legislators use some pieces of legislation as bargaining chips in negotiations with the gas industry. For example, the industry doesn’t support a severance tax, but the industry is pushing for a law authorizing forced pooling – compelling landowners who don’t wish to lease their mineral rights to be part of a drilling unit with others that do.

“Sometimes there are alliances that have to be built. &hellip Sometimes we rely on members to tell us when it’s time to strike. It gets complicated going between the House and the Senate. Members want to have all their ducks in a row to prevent there being (additional delays) in the process,” Maciorski said.

Bob Kassoway, director of the House Finance Committee for the Democratic Caucus, said any severance tax bill will likely be passed as part of the 2010-11 state budget, and it’s likely that little if any other Marcellus-related legislation will be passed until that happens.

Sen. Yaw was pleased that Act 15 was signed into law on March 22. Based on his Senate Bill 297, it repeals five-year confidentiality for gas production financial records and requires well operators to submit semi-annual reports to the state. It also requires the state Department of Environmental Protection to post well data online.

But while the debate continues over the severance tax, legislation on issues important to lease holders, to residents with environmental concerns and to members of the gas industry continue to languish in the House or Senate or their committees.

In addition to severance tax legislation, there are at least four Marcellus-related Senate bills and at least 17 House bills pending.

For example, legislators are holding off a vote on Rep. Bill DeWeese’s House Bill 10, which would enable counties to assess value to gas and oil for taxation purposes, likely because it hasn’t been decided what – if any – percentage of a severance tax will go to counties.

Introduced 16 months ago, House Bill 297 remains in the House Transportation Committee. Sponsored by Rep. Mark Longietti, D-Hermitage, it would require the state Department of Transportation to publish by the end of the year a revised schedule of bonding amounts for roads damaged by heavy truck traffic and to update the amount at least every three years.

PennDOT last revised the schedule in 1978, Longietti said, leaving officials in municipalities damaged by drilling trucks with insufficient guaranteed funding to repair their roads.

Rep. George’s House Bill 2213, which increases bonding amounts for wells, boosts the number of required well inspections by DEP and adds protections for water supplies, has gained much local support. But after an amendment in the House Environmental Resources and Energy Committee in May, it was re-committed to the House Appropriations Committee.

Sen. Lisa Baker, R-Lehman Township, announced in May she is working on a series of bills to provide additional protections to drinking water sources that could be harmed by drilling.

State Rep. Karen Boback, R-Harveys Lake, issued a statement last week stating that she also was working to develop legislation to protect drinking water from gas drilling practices.

Painfully aware of the slow legislative pace in Harrisburg, Boback is urging the governor to issue an executive order implementing additional protective rules before more well-drilling permits can be issued.

Copyright: Times Leader

State DEP chief talks about protecting water supplies in the Marcellus Shale areas.

By Steve Mocarskysmocarsky@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

HARRISBURG – State Department of Environmental Protection Secretary John Hanger laid down the law to representatives of oil and gas companies drilling in the Marcellus Shale at a meeting he called on Thursday.

More precisely, he laid out two sets of proposed regulations for natural gas drilling procedures and responding to reports of contamination of water supplies – proposed regulations that members of the oil and gas industry helped create.

“There were technical discussions on how to prevent gas migration from (natural gas) well sites to water wells and what to do if migration does occur and how to respond,” Hanger said in an interview from his cell phone as he was riding to Dimock after the meeting in Harrisburg.

Hanger was on his way to an interview with ABC News at the site of a natural gas well that Cabot Oil & Gas capped under DEP order after the regulatory agency determined it was one of three that leaked methane, contaminating the well water supplies of at least 14 households in the rural Susquehanna County village.

“I challenged the industry. … I made it clear that regulations would be enforced,” Hanger said, noting that DEP opened two new field offices in Northeastern Pennsylvania in response to Marcellus Shale development and is doubling its enforcement staff. “I also made it clear we were strengthening the rules,” he said.

DEP spokesman Tom Rathbun said in a separate interview that the new drilling regulations would require specific testing according to standards of the American National Standards Institute on steel casing used in all high-pressure oil and gas wells as well as the use of “oil-field grade” cement in well construction.

Rathbun said the oil and gas industry supports the implementation of those standards, and most companies already employ those practices under best-management practices. The goal is to have all companies comply, and Hanger asked the industry to voluntarily comply immediately, rather than wait until regulations receive all necessary approvals, which are expected in November.

Rathbun said the new regulations are “designed to prevent situations like the one in Dimock.” He said the issue there was incomplete casing – Cabot Oil & Gas didn’t use enough cement in the well construction.

DEP in April banned Cabot from drilling in Pennsylvania until it plugs the three wells determined to be leaking gas. Cabot has already paid a $240,000 fine and must pay $30,000 per month until the company meets its obligations.

Rathbun said one well is capped, and Cabot is currently working to cap a second.

He said most of the discussion at the meeting focused on responding to reports of gas migration into water sources.

Currently, the industry is required to report any suspected or confirmed occurrence of gas migration to DEP. The new regulations would require immediately reporting suspected or confirmed migration to DEP and to emergency responders for the affected municipality.

As chairman of the state Environmental Quality Board, Hanger on Monday will present those proposed regulations to the board for adoption. If approved, they will be sent to the House and the Senate Environmental Resources & Energy Committee.

Each legislative committee will have 30 days to review the proposed regulations before either recommending a vote or sending them to the Independent Regulatory Review Commission, which is composed of administrative law judges. A final approval is required from the state attorney general to ensure they are constitutional.

The whole process can take about six months.

Kathryn Klaber, president and executive director of the Marcellus Shale Coalition, which represents the natural gas production industry, said in a written statement that the coalition is “fully committed” to continue working with government regulators to ensure that the potential of the Marcellus Shale in the state is realized in a safe and responsible way.

“Today’s meeting with DEP represents yet another honest and straightforward discussion about the best practices needed to fully achieve this vision. Positive progress on practices relating to the management of historic and naturally occurring shallow gas, as well as other initiatives related to transparency and well integrity, will help our industry continue to strengthen its safety and environmental record while continuing to create tens of thousands of jobs each year for residents of this state,” Klaber said.

Steve Mocarsky, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7311.

Copyright: Times Leader

People are wondering just what EnCana will bring to Marcellus Shale drilling.

By Steve Mocarskysmocarsky@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

Edward Buda had been dealing with representatives of Whitmar Exploration Co. for about two years since he, his late brother and sister-in-law negotiated a lease with the company for natural gas drilling on their Fairmount Township property.

Now, there’s a new player in the mix, since Whitmar announced a partnership with EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. in November for a joint venture in drilling and development of the Marcellus Shale in Luzerne and Columbia counties.

Like others in the Back Mountain, Sweet Valley and Red Rock areas, Buda is a bit wary of the Denver-based energy company.

“We did business with Whitmar. How (Encana is) going to be, I don’t know. How they honor the contract, that’s to be seen. I still don’t know much about them,” said Buda, 75, who lives in Ross Township.

Buda’s brother Walter and Walter’s wife Eleanor signed a fairly simple three-page lease with Whitmar in February 2009, a month before Walter died. Eleanor passed away in November, Edward said, and he became the new lease holder just as EnCana came into the picture.

Now, EnCana wants to lease Edward’s property in Ross Township, but he isn’t too impressed with the $1,000-per-acre offer. And the 16-page lease proposal that has undergone many revisions is written in legalese, he said.

“They wanted to put a drill pad on my property (in Ross Township). I said I want to wait and see what happens in Red Rock (section of Fairmount Township). Everybody’s waiting to see whether it’s going to be a gusher or a fiasco in Red Rock,” Edward said.

Wendy Wiedenbeck, a public and community relations adviser for EnCana, said the well on Buda’s property and a second well planned for a Lake Township property owned by township Supervisor Amy Salansky and her husband, Paul, are exploratory ventures.

If those wells produce an acceptable amount of natural gas, EnCana will develop a plan for expanded drilling operations in the area, Wiedenbeck said. Drilling is expected to begin in July on Buda’s property and gas production should start by October. Clearing of an access road to the site began last week.

Company has won honors

For the past few months, Wiedenbeck has been the face of EnCana locally, arranging and attending meetings with people who live or own property within a mile of the planned drilling sites as well as attending meetings with local groups concerned about drilling activity in their communities.

A self-described “Army wife” with two sons – one in first grade, the other a senior in college, Wiedenbeck has lived in Colorado since 1989 and has been working in community/public relations since the early 1990s. She’s been with EnCana for five years.

“They’re a cultural fit for me. I believe they truly believe in responsible development,” Wiedenbeck said of her employer.

To prove her point, Wiedenbeck provided a long list of awards EnCana has received over the past few years. Just a few include:

• The 2008 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Natural Gas STAR award, recognizing outstanding efforts to measure, report and reduce methane emissions;

• Interstate Oil & Gas Conservation Commission Chairman’s Stewardship Awards, recognizing exemplary efforts in environmental stewardship by the oil and natural gas industry;

• The 2009 Colorado Oil & Gas Conservation Commission Award for Courtesy Matters program in the Denver-Julesburg Basin surrounding Erie, Colo.

“Courtesy Matters” is EnCana’s community engagement program that brings EnCana staff and third-party contractors together with the community to discuss the nuisance issues associated with company operations,” Wiedenbeck said.

“Courtesy Matters creates a working environment where open and ongoing dialog are paramount. Discussions generally include concerns with traffic, noise and dust associated with our operations,” she said.

Community investment vital

Marty Ostholthoff, community development director for Erie, Colo., said in a teleconference that EnCana is one of four major energy companies drilling in the Denver-Julesburg Basin, the others being Noble Energy Inc., Kerr-McGee Corp. and Anadarko Petroleum Corp.

Fred Diehl, assistant town administrator in Erie, said he would be remiss if he didn’t point out “how far ahead of the other operators EnCana is” when it comes to community investment.

Diehl said he mentioned to Wiedenbeck that officials wanted to install solar panels on a new community center being built, and EnCana donated $250,000 to make that happen. A month ago, the company donated $175,000 for eco-friendly lighting at community ball fields.

“It’s not a requirement that they make notifications to our residents (about drilling activities or problems), but they do. It’s not a requirement that they make financial investments into our community, but they do,” Ostholthoff said.

Of course, there’s a downside to the presence of the drilling companies in the suburban area, which lies in one of the largest natural gas fields in the country, Diehl said.

“These things are still loud,” he said of the drilling rigs. “People come into our offices complaining, ‘We can’t sleep.’ But we worked with the operators to put up hay bales and cargo trailers to minimize the noise. The only good thing is, (the drilling is) temporary.”

As far as addressing concerns of residents, Diehl said all of the companies seem willing and responsive. “If they’re not, one of them can give the whole industry a black eye,” Diehl said.

Wiedenbeck said EnCana will have a toll-free number posted at its drilling sites that people can call to report concerns. Callers who choose the Pennsylvania prompt will be automatically directed to her office or cell phone. An operations phone number also will be established, she said.

And while EnCana will hire someone locally to help with community relations efforts, Wiedenbeck said she will continue to be “that face” for the community. She has spent about half her time in Pennsylvania since EnCana partnered with Whitmar, sometimes bringing her youngest son, Sammy, on trips here.

“He loves Pennsylvania,” she said.

Steve Mocarsky, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7311.

Copyright: Times Leader

EnCana also allowed to put in gas metering station in Fairmount Township.

By Steve Mocarskysmocarsky@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

WILKES-BARRE – The Luzerne County Zoning Hearing Board on Tuesday gave the go-ahead for a natural gas drilling operation on 6 acres of land in Lake Township and a natural gas metering station on 5 acres in Fairmount Township – under certain conditions.

EnCana Oil & Gas USA Inc. sought a 12-month temporary use permit to drill a gas well, have a water tank storage facility and park five personnel trailers on a part of a 49-acre site located at 133 Soltis Road and owned by township Supervisor Amy Salansky and her husband, Paul.

The company also sought a special exception to install a permanent wellhead on the site.

In a separate application, EnCana sought a use variance to operate a natural gas meter station within a 112-acre parcel near the intersection of Mossville and Hartman roads on property owned by Thomas and Caroline Raskiewicz, in Fairmount Township, as well as a height variance to erect an associated 150-foot radio tower on the site.

Following a presentation by EnCana regulatory adviser Brenda Listner and listening to testimony from seven members of the public who opposed the plan in a packed hearing room at the county courthouse, the board adjourned for an approximately 10-minute executive session to, according to Chairman Lawrence Newman, “discuss the conditions that would be placed on the special exception request.”

The board then voted unanimously to approve all of Encana’s requests subject to the company providing evidence of:

• Approved permits from the state Department of Environmental Protection, the Susquehanna River Basin Commission and any other mandated agency.

• Road bonding based on acceptable rates as designated by supervisors of the townships of Lake and Lehman.

• Appropriate sound controls as necessary to minimize noise.

• Light diffusion as required to divert light away from neighboring structures.

• A dust-control plan including evidence that no contaminated water or water used in the hydraulic fracturing (fracking) process would be used for dust control.

• A pollution preparedness contingency plan, an emergency response plan and other plans set forth in EnCana’s “best management practices” outlined in a memo from EnCana.

Prior to the vote, local activist Dr. Thomas Jiunta, led off a round of questions from the public. He had asked EnCana representatives if many of the plans addressed in EnCana’s best management practices were available for review.

Listner said they were still in the works or under discussion with township officials.

Jiunta wanted to know how emergency response times in the area would be addressed, given that some sections of road are 17 feet wide and the average width of fire trucks and trucks associated with drilling operations are an average of 9 feet wide. There is no room for a truck to pull off a road and yield to an emergency vehicle, he said.

Michelle Boice of Harveys Lake said she doesn’t think “there’s any emergency preparedness,” noting that there are no police or fire departments in Lake Township, and the community relies on state police and volunteers from other communities for coverage.

Copyright: Times Leader

Jurisdiction over drilling for natural gas in the Marcellus Shale is subject of hearing.

By Steve Mocarskysmocarsky@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

HARRISBURG – The chairman of the state Public Utility Commission is confident that Marcellus Shale development will stabilize prices not only of natural gas, but electricity prices as well, and is thrilled the natural gas industry supports the PUC’s oversight of pipeline safety in Pennsylvania.

Commission members on Thursday heard testimony from representatives of the natural gas industry, a federal pipeline safety official, the state consumer advocate and the director of the Pennsylvania Association of Township Supervisors on the commission’s jurisdiction as related to Marcellus Shale development.

“I think everybody is in agreement that this increased gas supply, whether the gas is sold in Pennsylvania or not, is going to have a depressing effect on the wholesale price of gas,” PUC Chairman James H. Cawley said after the hearing.

Irwin “Sonny” Popowsky, of the state Office of Consumer Advocate, testified that the retail and wholesale price level of natural gas “has been on a roller coaster ride for years.”

He said an abundance of natural gas should stabilize and ultimately lower the price of gas and electricity so that it is affected by supply and demand rather than politics in the Middle East.

Commissioner Wayne Gardner said he’s heard that many roads were severely damaged under Chesapeake Energy traffic.
David J. Spigelmyer, vice president of government relations for Chesapeake, said a harsh freeze-thaw season and the fact that many roads were never constructed with proper foundations resulted in the need significant road repairs. But the company is bonded to repair those roads and has hired 23 road contractors in Bradford County to repair them.

David M. Sanko, executive director of the Pennsylvania Association of Township Supervisors, said his concern is that state law requires bonds for roadwork in the amount of $12,500, but it could cost up to $100,000.

Commissioner Robert Powelson asked how the commission can be confident that the “self-policing system (of the gas industry) will work and that safety will be maintained?”

Spigelmyer said the industry has worked closely with the state Department of Environmental Protection to ensure the industry meets state requirements and noted that permit fees that fund inspections climbed from $100 to about $4,000.

Alex Dankanich, general engineer with the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Office of Pipeline Safety, testified that of the 31 states that produce natural gas, only Pennsylvania and Alaska lack the statutory authority to regulate gas gathering pipelines.

Cawley noted that the administration had been pushing for the PUC to obtain inspection authority because the administration doesn’t have the manpower.

Dankanich said the PUC would be reimbursed 80 percent of the cost for inspecting non-Class I pipelines – those surrounded by 10 or fewer homes within 220 yards of a pipeline in a 1-mile stretch. Those lines are exempt from federal inspection.

PUC Vice Chairman Tyrone Christy asked if Pennsylvania should also exempt Class I pipelines from inspection.

Lindsay Sander, a consultant for the Marcellus Shale Coalition, said she was comfortable with the exemption given the low number of Class I problems.

Cawley said the natural gas industry “seems to be bending over backwards to be responsible. But you’ve got to have the rules in place for everybody, including the potential bad apples who are going to try and take shortcuts.”

He said the commission is not trying to economically regulate the gas production industry.

“We’re not going to try and set the rates. We just want safety jurisdiction, whether they’re a public utility or not. And … the industry coalition, which has 170 members, support us adopting the federal standards. … They’ve said that’s fine and they’ve said they’re willing to help pay for it on a per-mile basis,” he said.

Cawley said the commission has submitted proposed statutory language to House and Senate oversight committees related to PUC safety regulation.

“One part of it has already been passed by the House almost unanimously. It would increase fines for violations to the federal level. It would go from $10,000 per day to $100,000 per day and up to $1 million overall. House Bill 1128, that could be the vehicle for getting it done. The Senate could amend it and send it back over or the House could give us this additional legislation, but this is our top legislative priority – pipeline safety,” Cawley said.

He said he also asked the industry for a commitment to use PUC’s certificated trucks for hauling equipment and supplies, “and they’ve committed to that, which is good. We’ve increased carrier enforcement in that area because we discovered that in their haste to get supplies in, they weren’t using PUC certificated carriers.”

“We’ve increased our enforcement, … and now that they know we’re watching, they’ll be more careful about the carriers they use,” Cawley said.

Steve Mocarsky, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7311.

Copyright: Times Leader

Sporting groups, conservationists and anti-drilling neighbors protest the large-scale gas exploration.

MICHAEL RUBINKAM Associated Press Writer

PLEASANT MOUNT, Pa. — A few hundred yards from Louis Matoushek’s farmhouse is a well that could soon produce not only natural gas, but a drilling boom in the wild and scenic Delaware River watershed.

Energy companies have leased thousands of acres of land in Pennsylvania’s unspoiled northeastern tip, hoping to tap vast stores of gas in a sprawling rock formation — the Marcellus Shale — that some experts believe could become the nation’s most productive gas field.

Plenty of folks like Matoushek are eager for the gas, and the royalty checks, to start flowing — including farmers who see Marcellus money as a way to keep their struggling operations afloat.

“It’s a depressed area,” Matoushek said. “This is going to mean new jobs, real jobs, not government jobs.”

Standing in the way is a loose coalition of sporting groups, conservationists and anti-drilling neighbors. They contend that large-scale gas exploration so close to crucial waterways will threaten drinking water, ruin a renowned wild trout fishery, wreck property values, and transform a rural area popular with tourists into an industrial zone with constant noise and truck traffic.

Both sides are furiously lobbying the Delaware River Basin Commission, the powerful federal-interstate compact agency that monitors water supplies for 15 million people, including half the population of New York City. The commission has jurisdiction because the drilling process will require withdrawing huge amounts of water from the watershed’s streams and rivers and because of the potential for groundwater pollution.

The well on Matoushek’s 200-acre spread in the northern Pocono Mountains in Wayne County is up first. The commission is reviewing an application by Stone Energy Corp. of Lafayette, La., to extract gas from the well — the first of what could be thousands of applications by energy companies to sink wells in an area roughly the size of Connecticut.

Stone Energy’s application has already generated more than 1,700 written comments to the DRBC. The company, which paid a $70,000 penalty for drilling the Matoushek well without DRBC approval in 2008, has already received a permit from the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection.

Eager gas companies have leased more than 300 square miles of watershed land, conservation officials estimate.

“This is certainly just the start. There’s a lot of acreage out there, and a lot of people interested in leasing their land,” said Tracy Carluccio, deputy director of the anti-drilling Delaware Riverkeeper Network.

The Marcellus Shale is a rock formation 6,000 to 8,000 feet beneath Pennsylvania, New York, West Virginia and Ohio, including about 36 percent of the Delaware River basin. New drilling techniques now allow affordable access to supplies in the Marcellus and other shales in the U.S. that once were too expensive to tap.

Energy companies combine horizontal drilling with hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” a technique that injects vast amounts of water, along with sand and chemicals, underground to break up the shale and release the gas.

While gas companies refuse to identify the chemicals they use — claiming that is proprietary information — critics cite contamination problems in other natural gas drilling fields. They worry that unregulated fracking can taint drinking water, deplete aquifers and produce briny wastewater that can kill fish. In Dimock, Pa., about 40 miles west of the Matoushek well but outside the Delaware basin, state environmental regulators say that cracked casings on fracked wells have tainted residential water supplies with methane gas.

The Environmental Protection Agency announced last month that it will study the impact of fracking on the environment and human health. The EPA said in 2004 there was no evidence that fracking threatens drinking water quality, but critics, including a veteran engineer in the Denver regional EPA office, argued that report’s methodology was flawed.

The industry contends environmental concerns are overblown. It says the drilling techniques are safe and that there has never been a proven case of groundwater contamination caused by fracking — in part because fracking occurs far below the water table. Congress exempted hydraulic fracturing from federal oversight in 2005.

Dozens of people told the DRBC at a recent public hearing why they oppose the watershed drilling. A few supporters called it an economic boon and a property-rights issue.

Richard Kreznar, who owns property in the Pennsylvania riverfront community of Damascus, said gas drilling primarily benefits large landowners and exploration companies.

“After the Delaware River and the stream next to my house are messed up, what compensation will I get? Who will put it back together again?” he asked DRBC staff.

Lee Hartman, the Delaware River chairman for Trout Unlimited, worries that large water withdrawals required for fracking will create low stream flows in the Delaware’s tributaries, damaging fish habitat. For the Matoushek well, Stone Energy wants to take 700,000 gallons a day from the Lackawaxen River’s narrow west branch.

Hartman and others say the DRBC should first study the cumulative environmental impacts of drilling in the Delaware watershed, and pass drilling regulations, before it allows any gas extraction to take place. The agency has asked for $250,000 in federal funds for a study, but commissioners have not said whether they will wait before voting on Matoushek’s well.

Opponents say they will sue if Stone Energy’s application is approved.

Downstream communities that rely on the Delaware for drinking water are worried about the coming gas boom. New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg opposes any drilling in the watershed, while the Philadelphia City Council has asked the basin commission for an environmental study.

New York state regulators have put a moratorium on drilling in the Marcellus region, saying they won’t approve permits until they are finished drafting new regulations.

Back in northeastern Pennsylvania, Matoushek, 68, a semiretired farmer who signed a lease with Stone Energy three years ago, said he is counting on royalty checks from gas production to help fund his golden years and secure the land for future generations of his family. As far he’s concerned, the benefits far outweigh any theoretical harm.

Copyright: Times Leader

Before Marcellus Shale work, queries made over well water tests, roads and procedures.

EILEEN GODIN Times Leader Correspondent

LAKE TWP. — A gas company coming into the township in July caused residents to question procedures, well-water testing and road maintenance during Wednesday night’s supervisors meeting.

In July, Lake Township will begin a Marcellus Shale gas drilling operation by EnCana Oil and Gas USA of Denver, Colo. The site is owned by Supervisor Amy Salansky.

Salansky said the farm was previously owned by an older neighbor, who willed the gas and mineral rights to a nephew and gave Salansky and her husband the “first right to buy” the land.

“The agreement was already made when we purchased the farm,” Salansky said.

Residents within a mile radius of the site have recently received letters from EnCana stating a voluntary assessment of well water will be scheduled immediately. Salansky said the letter states a third-party environmental firm, Rettew, of Lancaster, will collect water samples.

Samples will then be sent to a state certified lab, at no cost to residents.

The letter stated that if residents wanted to use a lab of their choosing to test water, the sample will be split by Rettew and sent to a second lab. This would be at the residents’ cost.

With 75 percent of the township’s roads dirt, residents questioned supervisors on routes EnCana may use and who would be responsible for maintenance and repairing damages.

Chairman Lonnie Piatt said the township roads are not bonded yet, but the township does have an agreement with EnCana. He said it is a possibility that EnCana will hire a contractor for road maintenance. What routes will be used is still undecided.

Salansky said that officials have not sat down with EnCana to determine which routes will be used.

Barney Dobinick, the township’s emergency management coordinator, said it is possible that the gas driller’s trucks will run on a different schedule than school buses, so the two are not navigating roads at the same time.

Dobinick said EnCana has provided him with a list of chemicals to be used on site and a list of the firm’s safety guidelines. He also has the state Department of Environmental Protection’s regulations for gas drilling.

In other business, the annual spring cleanup will be 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. May 8, at the municipal building.

Residents must have proof of residency and pay $15 per pickup-truck load, $20 for large pickups and $6 per car load. An additional $6 fee will be applied for the following items: washers, dryers, carpets, overstuffed chairs, couches, dressers, TV sets, hot water heaters, boilers, furnaces, stoves and large appliances.

The following items will not be accepted: tires, hazardous wastes, chemicals, brush, tree stumps, cinder blocks, animal waste, shingles, sheet rock or other building materials, garbage, freezers, refrigerators containing Freon, and air conditioners.

For questions, call 629-2828.

Copyright: Times Leader