Posts Tagged ‘Chesapeake Energy’

Growing number of landowners hope to gain income by allowing gas drilling on their property.

By Rory Sweeneyrsweeney@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

FAIRMOUNT TWP. – Scarring Michael Giamber’s 74-acre forested spread with gas wells and pipelines might seem like a nightmare to some, but that’s the fairytale ending for which he’s hoping.

Giamber is part of a growing number of landowners in Northeastern Pennsylvania who have leased their land for drilling in the Marcellus Shale, a gas-laden layer of rock about a mile underground that runs through the northern part of the state. They hope to collect not only lucrative bonuses paid upfront for signing a lease – one offered locally last week was $5,750 per acre – but long-term income from royalties on the gas pumped from their property and rent from hosting needed infrastructure.

Early estimates for some properties put earnings well into the millions of dollars over the life of their gas deposits.

Giamber isn’t necessarily expecting that, but he wants to give his property every chance to succeed. He signed a lease with Denver-based WhitMar Exploration Co., which has locked up more than 22,000 acres in, among other places, Fairmount, Ross, Lake, Lehman, Union, Hunlock, Huntington and Dallas townships. The company offers a relatively negligible sign-up bonus – $12.50 per acre – in exchange for 19.5-percent royalties, a short lease period and stipulations that require expedited permitting and drilling.

“As we all know, the real money is in the gas royalties, not the bonus money,” Giamber noted. “Getting a well with a 20-percent royalty is better than a high bonus and no well.”

Opponents of drilling, however, cite a slew of potential environmental indignities from overt destruction of bucolic rural lands to more insidious but less-proven threats, such as groundwater contamination, overuse of regional water supplies and geologic shifting that might cause earthquakes.

Giamber sees much of that as hypocritical moralizing, and he has but to look down his road for an example of it. Every time he drives from his yard to state Route 118, he passes what he calls a homemade scrap heap on a neighbor’s property that’s filled with abandoned cars, rusted appliances and other items long beyond their usefulness. “It blows my mind how they just abuse the land, and now we’re going to bring in some money, and they get all up in arms,” he said.

If people truly cared about the earth, he reasons, they’d be outraged by such overgrown trash piles. But it’s been there for years, and no one’s complained about it. There are no doubt more just like it, too, he says.

In fact, in that context, Giamber sees his use of the land as beneficial. At least it has a positive purpose – providing a cleaner alternative to oil and coal, creating jobs and providing wealth – instead of just being a place to throw trash.

That said, Giamber has reservations. A few months ago, he visited a well site in Susquehanna County, where he found natural gas bubbling from the watery area at the base of a wellhead. He was told by a WhitMar representative that another company had made a mistake that wouldn’t happen in their work. “We’re all trying to rationalize it right now, and not get upset about it.”

While not necessarily an issue, recent lease agreements as close as Wyoming County make his deal look “anemic,” Giamber acknowledges. Chesapeake Energy, one of the largest companies in the industry, announced last week an agreement with the Wyoming County Landowners group for a 5-year, 20-percent royalty lease with a $5,750 sign-on bonus.

A landowners’ group near Giamber, the South West Ross Township Property Group, says it’s in talks with an undisclosed company whose offer is in the same “ballpark,” according to Ken Long, a member of the group’s executive committee. Long would neither confirm nor deny that it’s Chesapeake.

Still, Giamber believes the math of his deal could work better. “The fat lady hasn’t sung yet,” he said in an e-mail. “Let’s say I get a well three years before my neighbor that signed with Chesapeake at $5,500 (per-acre bonus). I’m still ahead. The variables are many and the future too hard to predict. I am just happy that WhitMar is moving forward by drilling the first wells in Luzerne County.”

Copyright: Times Leader

After ’08 deal dies, Wyoming County Landowners expect Chesapeake Energy deal.

By Rory Sweeneyrsweeney@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

A year after the financial meltdown sank a lucrative gas-lease offer, the Wyoming County Landowners group has come to terms with another company, Chesapeake Energy, for what is expected to be a record deal.

Neither side has released details yet, but Chip Lines-Burgess, secretary of the landowners’ group, expected an announcement late Tuesday evening.

“No one in the region has seen this amount of money,” she said. “We’re excited about the offer we have received, and it’s going to be a huge impact for our entire region financially. … Hopefully, it comes to fruition. … This is what we’ve been striving for the last year and a half.”

She added that lease signings could come as soon as a facility is secured that is large enough to hold the expected 600 to 800 landowners involved.

The group is composed of roughly 37,000 acres in Wyoming, Bradford, Susquehanna, Sullivan and Lackawanna counties. A minimal amount of Luzerne County acreage is also involved, Lines-Burgess said.

Only those who have recently re-signed are currently members, she said, though other members can re-join by filling out paperwork on the group’s Web site. New members also might be considered, though Lines-Burgess was unsure what the demarcations will be. She also noted that while current Lackawanna County members will remain in, it’s unclear if new landowners from that county will be accepted.

In August 2008, the group made headlines by signing a lease with Colorado-based Citrus Energy, but the worldwide financial crisis caused the deal to fall through quickly. Ironically, Citrus was chosen after it beat an original offer from Chesapeake.

The landowners regrouped quickly and began aggressively courting companies, creating a solicitous Web site and attending two industry expos. Most members chipped in $30 to cover various expenses, including creating their own roughly 40-page lease with items worked in that are usually left for individual landowners to add or subtract as addendums.

“We knew that we wanted a company that could afford to buy 37,000 acres … that could not only buy us, but drill us,” Lines-Burgess said. “In order to do that, we knew we had to go for the cream of the crop. … Within the last month, it has just heated up tremendously.”

Chesapeake is one of the largest natural-gas producers in the country and the largest leaseholder in the Marcellus Shale, a layer of gas-laden rock about a mile underground that’s centered on northern Pennsylvania.

Lines-Burgess said Marty L. Byrd, the vice president for land in Chesapeake’s Eastern Division, flew into the region Monday evening to meet with members of the landowners’ group Tuesday morning. He is expected to meet with the group’s core membership today, and leases could be signed by the end of the month, she said.

“There was a little give and take all the way around,” she said, citing the company’s requirement of an increased drilling-unit size. The group estimates about 100 well pads will be created throughout the entire acreage.

TO LEARN MORE

To join the landowners’ group, read its lease and find other information about the group, go to its Web site at: www.pamarcellusshale.com

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader

Gas drillers’ access to Harveys Lake water doesn’t seem likely.

HARVEYS LAKE – The borough is girding itself against potential plans to use lake water for natural-gas drilling, but the state Department of Environmental Protection thinks attempting to gain access to the water might be more trouble than it’s worth.

At its recent monthly meeting, borough council had solicitor Charles McCormick write to the Susquehanna River Basin Commission noting in the letter that the council “strongly opposes &hellip any consumptive use of water from the tributary system of Harveys Lake.”

Council became concerned after receiving a phone call and a notice. The notice was of Chesapeake Energy’s request to increase its one-day water-removal limit from the basin to 20 million gallons, and the phone call was from an engineering firm representing a gas company.

Brent Ramsey, an environmental scientist with Harrisburg-based international engineering consulting firm Gannett Fleming, had asked who owned the water rights at the lake and if the water could be procured for a well-drilling client, borough secretary Susan Sutton said.

He also called the borough’s Environmental Advisory Council asking similar questions, EAC secretary Denise Sult said.

Ramsey said the client directed that the operation be kept confidential, but acknowledged that his company’s involvement is in securing water-use permitting and that approval for a source of water hasn’t yet been secured. He refused to comment on whether the lake was still a target or if other sources were being sought.

Tapping the lake’s resources might prove difficult, however, said DEP spokesman Mark Carmon. “There’s been a long-standing question mark about who owns the bottom of the lake,” he said. “It’s probably a lot more complicated that it’s worth, in a legal sense, for anybody.”

He said the borough doesn’t own the water and individual lakefront landowners would have to be contacted. Deeds would have to be checked for exact descriptions of how far out into the water each property border protrudes. Any user-landowner agreement would still need to get SRBC approval “and face the wrath of the neighbors on each side of them,” he said.

“We think that’s the way it would play out,” he said.

He said that he wasn’t aware of any proposals or approvals of water usage in Luzerne County for gas drilling.

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader

Insiders say price declines and credit issues are limiting lease bids and bonus payment offers.

The natural-gas windfall seems to have dried up – at least for now.

Commodity price declines, disappearing credit worthiness and companies transitioning to produce gas from the lands they’ve leased have combined to limit lease bids and reduce bonus payment offers.

“Not only are we noticing it, there’s no argument that’s not happening,” said Jack Sordoni, who owns the Wilkes-Barre-based fossil-fuel drilling company Homeland Energy Ventures LLC and is negotiating leases for local landowners.

Though he’s recently inked leases in Fairmount Township with $2,850 per acre up-front bonuses, he said he’s also recently had similar offers in the same area fall to $2,000 per acre. Other sources are reporting offers dropping back to pre-summer levels of several hundred dollars.

Part of the cause for the change, he noted, is that some large companies have dropped out of the leasing competition because prices have fallen and the credit crisis has hampered their ability to take on short-term debt.

“I would suspect, not being an economist, that they would have pretty far reaching” effects, he said. “The ones who are signing aren’t competing with as many players, so the prices aren’t going to be as high.”

The companies say the clock is ticking on beginning work on existing leases, so they’re focusing on filling out the gaps in the territories they’ve already locked up.

“We have moved from the lease acquisition phase to the development phase,” Chesapeake Energy spokesman Matt Sheppard wrote in an e-mail. “We are leasing strategically to support our existing leasehold.”

Sheppard said that for Chief Oil & Gas and many companies “it is more of a shift to moving dollars into drilling and development” instead of continuing to build leasehold in unproven areas.

Chief Oil & Gas spokeswoman Kristi Gittins wrote in an e-mail: “A lot of acreage has been leased. As drilling begins and areas prove out, leasing should pick up.”

Sordoni said that in the business “a lot of times we call that ‘going operational,’ and think for many of them, that’s true.”

With drilling and production increasing, natural gas prices have dropped about 50 percent in the past half year, he noted.

“This was a gold rush at the beginning. It was a frantic pace. Companies were scrambling. The pullback of the commodity prices has certainly led to a slowdown,” he said.

But there are some positive indications for unsigned properties. For example, companies have already shown indications of ramping up production in the region.

Gittins said Chief will soon have four rigs in the region, including one made specially for maneuvering in the hilly Appalachian region, and two more by early 2009.

First, the gas isn’t going anywhere. Horizontal drilling only allows vertical fracturing of rock, and it’s illegal to drill beyond the leased boundaries. So the rule of capture – which allows gas or oil to be collected from a rock fracture that crosses a lease boundary – doesn’t apply.

Secondly, companies have already shown indications of ramping up production in the region.

Gittins said Chief will soon have four rigs in the region, including one made specially for maneuvering in the hilly Appalachian region, and two more by early 2009.

Chesapeake is predicting it will need much more water for its drilling operations before the 2012 expiration of its current permit with the Susquehanna River Basin Commission. While the company isn’t asking to change its permit to withdraw 5 million gallons daily from the river, it is asking to expand how much water it can use each day from 5 million gallons to roughly 20 million gallons.

Copyright: Times Leader

Companies now are focusing on drilling land that’s already been leased, industry experts say.

The natural-gas windfall seems to have dried up – at least for now.

Commodity price declines, disappearing credit worthiness and companies transitioning to produce gas from the lands they’ve leased have combined to limit lease bids and reduce bonus payment offers.

“Not only are we noticing it, there’s no argument that’s not happening,” said Jack Sordoni, who owns the Wilkes-Barre-based fossil-fuel drilling company Homeland Energy Ventures LLC and is negotiating leases for local landowners.

Though he’s recently inked leases in Fairmount Township with $2,850 per acre up-front bonuses, he said he’s also had this week similar offers in the same area fall to $2,000 per acre. Other sources are reporting offers dropping back to pre-summer levels of several hundred dollars.

Part of the cause for the change, he noted, is that some large companies have dropped out of the leasing competition because prices have fallen and the credit crisis has hampered their ability to take on short-term debt.

“I would suspect, not being an economist, that they would have pretty far reaching” effects, he said. “The ones who are signing aren’t competing with as many players, so the prices aren’t going to be as high.”

The companies say the clock is ticking on beginning work on existing leases, so they’re focusing on filling out the gaps in the territories they’ve already locked up.

“We have moved from the lease acquisition phase to the development phase,” Chesapeake Energy spokesman Matt Sheppard wrote in an e-mail. “We are leasing strategically to support our existing leasehold.”

Sheppard said that for Chief Oil & Gas and many companies “it is more of a shift to moving dollars into drilling and development” instead of continuing to build leasehold in unproven areas.

Chief Oil & Gas spokeswoman Kristi Gittins wrote in an e-mail: “A lot of acreage has been leased. As drilling begins and areas prove out, leasing should pick up.”

With drilling and production increasing, natural gas prices have dropped about 50 percent in the past half year, he noted.

“This was a gold rush at the beginning. It was a frantic pace. Companies were scrambling. The pullback of the commodity prices has certainly led to a slowdown,” he said.

But there are some positive indications for unsigned properties. For example, companies have already shown indications of ramping up production in the region.

Gittins said Chief will soon have four rigs in the region, including one made specially for maneuvering in the hilly Appalachian region, and two more by early 2009.

With drilling and production increasing, natural gas prices have dropped about 50 percent in the past half year.

Copyright: Times Leader

By JOSEPH B. WHITE The Wall Street Journal

First it was ethanol made from corn. Then ethanol made from twigs and stems and trash. Then, the future was going to belong to hydrogen. Now, the alternative fuel flavor of the month in Washington is natural gas.

You may know this already, thanks to vigorous public-relations campaigns mounted to promote natural gas as a vehicle fuel by energy billionaire T. Boone Pickens and allies such as Chesapeake Energy Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Aubrey McClendon. Mr. Pickens touts natural gas as a fuel for cars as part of his broad “Pickens Plan” to reduce America’s dependence on foreign oil.

Mr. Pickens, in a television ad, summarizes his case for using natural gas as a vehicle fuel in nine words: “It’s cleaner. It’s cheaper. It’s abundant. And it’s ours.”

Nothing is ever that simple in the energy business. A lot of natural gas isn’t “ours.” It belongs to the same companies that currently supply us with oil, or to big gas utilities such as Ch esapeake. But Mr. Pickens is correct when he says that natural gas is abundant in the U.S. Recent advances in drilling technology have made it possible to exploit gas reserves that weren’t economical to tap before, such as the Marcellus Shale in the Appalachian region of the Northeastern U.S.

The macro problem that Mr. Pickens and gas industry executives need to solve is what to do with all that new gas – assuming it becomes available as forecast. Already, natural-gas prices have slumped about 40 percent since May. Grabbing some of petroleum’s more than 90 percent share of the U.S. vehicle fuels market is a smart strategy for the gas industry.

The question for consumers who don’t own shares in natural-gas companies is whether a compressed-gas fueled vehicle is a better deal than some other green technology, or the status quo.

The only natural gas car on the U.S. market right now is a Honda Civic GX. Honda Motor Co. let me borrow one for a few days to road t est the NGV (natural-gas vehicle) lifestyle.

Driving the Civic GX isn’t different than driving a standard, petrol-fueled car. My white test car had an automatic transmission and the usual bells and whistles. The adventure of driving a natural-gas fueled Civic only starts when the fuel gauge gets close to empty – and that happens fairly quickly because the car’s range is only 200 to 220 miles between fill-ups.

At this point, you’ll need an Internet connection to help you find a public natural-gas vehicle refueling station in your metro area. If you are fortunate will you find one in your ZIP code, because there are only about 1,100 natural-gas refueling stations in the U.S. The closest one to my house was about 18 miles away at a depot owned by the City of Ann Arbor.

The unmanned refueling station had an imposing looking pump with two hoses that dispensed compressed gas at different pressures. The Civic’s manual explained that I should use the one marked 360 0 pounds per square inch. Behind the Civic GX’s fuel door is a nozzle fitting. After a couple of tries, I got the fitting from the high-pressure hose properly locked on, and threw a lever on the pump to “On” to start the flow.

I realize it was irrational and techno-phobic to worry that I would somehow overfill the compressed gas tank on board the car and turn my Civic into an explosive device. Let’s say that I was nervous enough that I had done something wrong that when the pump shut off automatically, I was relieved, even though the system had only refilled the tank to the half-full mark. Mr. Pickens could add another element to his plan: It will create jobs for filling station attendants who can help nervous natural-gas newbies.

On the positive side, my natural gas was about half the price of the equivalent quantity of gasoline – $1.94 a gallon.

The Honda Civic GX illustrates almost perfectly the chicken-and-egg problems besetting efforts to wean personal transportation in the U.S. away from petroleum fuels.

Because there aren’t many natural-gas refueling stations, Honda only builds a couple of thousand natural-gas Civics a year, and other car makers are reluctant to push the technology to consumers. Because there are so few natural-gas vehicles, outside of commercial or government fleets, fuel retailers don’t have much incentive to sink $500,000 to $750,000 into a natural-gas refilling station capable of handling cars as rapidly as a conventional gas station can, says Richard Kolodziej, president of NGV America, a Washington advocacy group that represents about 100 natural-gas companies and other enterprises with a stake in promoting natural gas as a motor fuel.

Because there is little demand for natural-gas vehicles, the ones that are available come with a hefty price premium, in part because their fuel tanks aren’t molded plastic, but are instead heavily engineered, high-pressure tanks. A Civic GX lists for ab out $24,590, compared to about $17,760 for the mid-range Civic LX on which it is based. Tax credits can offset as much as $4,000 of that price. And in some states, natural-gas cars can use high-occupancy vehicle express lanes – a major perk for time-pressed commuters.

The Civic GX achieves about 24 miles to the gallon in the city and 36 on the highway, when its consumption is converted to gasoline equivalent miles per gallon, Honda says. The Environmental Protection Agency estimates the GX’s annual fuel costs at $884 a year, compared to $1,987 a year for a petroleum-fueled Civic. That indicates a payback, after the tax credit, of about 2½ years on the premium over the standard car.

One problem with the natural-gas Civic, Mr. Kolodziej concedes, is that it doesn’t look any different than a normal car. It doesn’t advertise the owner’s green cred the way a Prius does. “Where’s the sex in that?” He asks. “The sex comes in when you fill up for $10.”

Mr. Kolodzie j says he refuels his Civic GX using a Phill home-fueling system. This costs about $5,000 and allows a natural-gas vehicle owner to refuel overnight with gas from the lines running into the house. (A $1,000 tax credit is available for the Phill system.) But the hardware in Mr. Kolodziej’s garage isn’t all that’s different. He also says he doesn’t care that the vehicle has a limited range and takes hours to refill using the home refueling device.

“I go to work. I go to the store,” he says. “That’s what 99 percent of people do. Americans want to be able to drive to California tomorrow. They won’t.”

Mr. Kolodziej would say that. But he’s right. A switch to natural-gas cars would require a change of attitudes and expectations both by consumers and car makers. More of us would need to accept owning a car that can do one job – commuting and running errands in fewer than 200 miles a day. It’s the same fundamental proposition behind plug-in hybrids such as the Chevrolet Volt or plug-in Prius.

The big hurdle for natural-gas vehicles is that somebody will need to invest substantial sums in a consumer refueling infrastructure. The gas industry was hoping that somebody would be Uncle Sam. Unfortunately, Congress just found out last week it may have to spend $700 billion salvaging the global financial system. That could put big federal subsidies for natural-gas cars – and a lot of other worthy ideas – on the back burner.

___

Send comments about Eyes on the Road to joseph.white@wsj.com.

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press.

Posted At: Times Leader