Posts Tagged ‘DALLAS’

By Jen Marckinijmarckini@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

KINGSTON TWP. – A representative of Shaleshock Action Alliance spoke about issues of drilling into the Marcellus Shale at a public meeting on Friday.

The meeting, sponsored by the newly formed group, Luzerne County Citizens for Clean Water, featured a presentation by Andrew Byers, of Ithaca, N.Y.

Gas companies have leased thousands of acres from Benton to Dallas and plan on drilling by “hydro-fracturing,” a high-pressure pumping process that could have detrimental environmental and economic impacts, Byers said.

An estimated 2 million to 9 million gallons of water mixed with chemicals is used per well in fracking, Byers said. Sixty-five of the chemicals are classified as hazardous waste – many causing cancer or birth defects, he said.

According to Byers, products used in natural gas production in Colorado had adverse health effects, including endocrine disruptors.

“This is not waste water,” he said. “This is low-level radioactive fluid.”

Property values have shown to plummet after gas drilling, Byers said, adding that each fracking requires 550 to 2,500 tanker truck trips, which could result in road damage.

In 2005 the gas and oil industry became exempt from the Safe Drinking Water Act. They are not required to comply with federal or local laws.

“We have an industry that is unregulated on a federal level,” Byers said.

About a dozen people are active in the grassroots group that wants to protect its communities, said Audrey Simpson, a member.

A petition to say no to polluted water and unrestricted natural gas drilling in the county was distributed at the evening meeting, which was held at Kingston Township Municipal Building, Shavertown.

The petition asks state legislators to modify state laws to allow restrictions on drilling in populated areas.

State Rep. Phyllis Mundy, who attended the meeting, said she is concerned about the potential harm that could be done as a result of drilling into the Marcellus Shale.

Mundy, D-Kingston, said she and state Rep. Karen Boback, R-Harveys Lake, are working with the chairman of the Environmental Resources and Energy Committee in the House on bills that would provide protection such as buffers around waterways.

“I support a Marcellus Shale severance tax that would be dedicated toward any environmental harm or impact that is caused by the drilling,” Mundy said.

Copyright: Times Leader

EnCana Corp. will work with WhitMar Exploration Co. in seeking gas in the Marcellus Shale in the region.

By Rory Sweeneyrsweeney@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

EnCana Corp., perhaps the largest natural-gas producer in North America, has chosen Luzerne County as its entry point into the Marcellus Shale, thanks to an exploratory agreement with WhitMar Exploration Co.

WhitMar, a Denver-based exploratory company, has already leased about 25,000 acres in Columbia and Luzerne counties, including in Fairmount, Ross, Lake, Dallas, Lehman, Jackson, Huntington, Union, Hunlock and the northwest corner of Plymouth townships.

However, it doesn’t have the resources to develop the entire leasehold, so it went looking for a partner. It found EnCana, a Calgary-based company with U.S. headquarters in Denver that produced 1.4 trillion cubic feet of natural gas in 2008, according to its Web site. For comparison, Chesapeake Energy, another industry leader with a local presence, produced 839.5 billion cubic feet that year, according to its 2008 annual report.

Spokesman Doug Hock said EnCana has no other interest in the Marcellus Shale, a ribbon of gas-laden rock about a mile underground that stretches from upstate New York into Virginia but centers on Pennsylvania.

The agreement, however, only commits EnCana to the two exploratory wells WhitMar has agreed in its leases to create, Hock said. “Further activity will really depend on the results of the first two wells,” he said. “The first couple wells that we’re drilling are really to prove it up and ensure that we have viable program there.”

Both wells, while exploratory, will also be put into production, he said, though it’s unclear where pipelines will be installed to connect the wells to regional gas lines.

The deal gives EnCana 75 percent interest in the leasehold and control as the operator, according to WhitMar spokesman Brad Shepard. “Being an exploration company, we’re a small company,” he said. “At least in the Marcellus, we get a partner to develop it with.”

He said there were several companies interested, but that EnCana was “the best fit” thanks to similar interests in testing, drilling and size of the project.

Both companies are also interested in increasing the acreage in the leasehold, he said. Within the area the current lease encompasses, there are perhaps 25,000 to 30,000 acres that aren’t leased, Shepard said. “What we’re trying to do now is basically trying to infill all the land that we have now,” he said.

According to Hock, EnCana, whose business is currently 80 percent gas production, is in the process of splitting the company into two “pure plays” to “enhance the value” of each: EnCana, which would focus entirely on gas, and Cenovus Energy Inc. to oversee its oil-sands operations in Canada.

“We’re in that process right now,” Hock said. “The deal is expected to close at the end of the month.”

EnCana slid on the New York Stock Exchange this week, from $59.40 per share on Monday to $56.11 on Friday.

Both companies are also interested in increasing the acreage in the leasehold.

Copyright: Times Leader

Law will restrict gas wells to specific areas

By Rory Sweeneyrsweeney@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

There’s no natural-gas drilling in Dallas, but that’s not stopping the borough from deciding where it will allow drilling.

As part of the revision of its zoning ordinance, Dallas is adding provisions that would restrict sitting gas wells to areas zoned industrial, highway or business. It would also designate distance setbacks from residences, waterways, streets and wetlands.

The proactive stance is putting Dallas at the forefront of what could become a major issue as drilling in the Marcellus Shale increases.

“You’re talking about a very fundamental conflict between the municipal regulation of land use and the ability of landowner to access land rights,” said Stephen Rhoads, the president of the Pennsylvania Oil & Gas Association. “You could think of this in terms of taking.”

“Taking” is illegally blocking someone’s access to the point of essentially denying their rights. Eventually, it will find its way to court, Rhoads said, though he wouldn’t speculate on who would win.

At its meeting on Thursday, the borough’s planning commission recommended the borough council vote on the revisions.

“The main point is that we were already going through a revision … so we thought it would be proactive to include something that reflects what’s going on in the Back Mountain these days,” Borough Manager Tracey Carr said.

The ordinance would also require drillers to identify roads they plan to use, pay for an engineer to document the roads’ conditions and be responsible for maintenance and repair.

With a flurry of lease signings lately, gas drilling has become a hot topic in the county. Drillers are flocking to the area to tap the Marcellus Shale, a layer of gas-laden rock about a mile underground that stretches from New York to Virginia. Its huge size – and economic potential – has been known for years, but technology only recently caught up to access it.

Despite industry innovations such as horizontal drilling that allow wells to access gas pockets up to a mile away, Rhoads said having versatility in well sites makes “a difference because it depends how much surface area is put off limits. You can’t just put a well site on the edge of town and drill from one well site and get every possible molecule of gas.”

Carr said the provisions aren’t meant to keep drilling out of any areas, “just where would be most appropriate if it was to take place.”

Rhoads said such actions can harm landowners. “The geology will dictate where the well (should be) located – not zoning – and if there’s a conflict between zoning and geology, the geology loses,” he said. “You’re effectively telling me that my oil and gas property is worthless if you zone my surface property in such a way that I can’t gain access to it.”

On the scale of issues facing the industry – including access to water for gas extraction, disposal options for waste and a proposed state severance tax – Rhoads called zoning “a major issue.”

But for Carr and the borough she manages, it’s just being efficient and responsible. “This is actually a very small part of what we’re doing,” she said, noting that the borough’s consultant on the revision suggested adding the drilling provisions.

The proposed ordinance must go through a public hearing and likely won’t be addressed by the council until November or December, she said. There have been no complaints so far, she said, “but we haven’t had the public hearing yet, either.”

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader

Growing number of landowners hope to gain income by allowing gas drilling on their property.

By Rory Sweeneyrsweeney@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

FAIRMOUNT TWP. – Scarring Michael Giamber’s 74-acre forested spread with gas wells and pipelines might seem like a nightmare to some, but that’s the fairytale ending for which he’s hoping.

Giamber is part of a growing number of landowners in Northeastern Pennsylvania who have leased their land for drilling in the Marcellus Shale, a gas-laden layer of rock about a mile underground that runs through the northern part of the state. They hope to collect not only lucrative bonuses paid upfront for signing a lease – one offered locally last week was $5,750 per acre – but long-term income from royalties on the gas pumped from their property and rent from hosting needed infrastructure.

Early estimates for some properties put earnings well into the millions of dollars over the life of their gas deposits.

Giamber isn’t necessarily expecting that, but he wants to give his property every chance to succeed. He signed a lease with Denver-based WhitMar Exploration Co., which has locked up more than 22,000 acres in, among other places, Fairmount, Ross, Lake, Lehman, Union, Hunlock, Huntington and Dallas townships. The company offers a relatively negligible sign-up bonus – $12.50 per acre – in exchange for 19.5-percent royalties, a short lease period and stipulations that require expedited permitting and drilling.

“As we all know, the real money is in the gas royalties, not the bonus money,” Giamber noted. “Getting a well with a 20-percent royalty is better than a high bonus and no well.”

Opponents of drilling, however, cite a slew of potential environmental indignities from overt destruction of bucolic rural lands to more insidious but less-proven threats, such as groundwater contamination, overuse of regional water supplies and geologic shifting that might cause earthquakes.

Giamber sees much of that as hypocritical moralizing, and he has but to look down his road for an example of it. Every time he drives from his yard to state Route 118, he passes what he calls a homemade scrap heap on a neighbor’s property that’s filled with abandoned cars, rusted appliances and other items long beyond their usefulness. “It blows my mind how they just abuse the land, and now we’re going to bring in some money, and they get all up in arms,” he said.

If people truly cared about the earth, he reasons, they’d be outraged by such overgrown trash piles. But it’s been there for years, and no one’s complained about it. There are no doubt more just like it, too, he says.

In fact, in that context, Giamber sees his use of the land as beneficial. At least it has a positive purpose – providing a cleaner alternative to oil and coal, creating jobs and providing wealth – instead of just being a place to throw trash.

That said, Giamber has reservations. A few months ago, he visited a well site in Susquehanna County, where he found natural gas bubbling from the watery area at the base of a wellhead. He was told by a WhitMar representative that another company had made a mistake that wouldn’t happen in their work. “We’re all trying to rationalize it right now, and not get upset about it.”

While not necessarily an issue, recent lease agreements as close as Wyoming County make his deal look “anemic,” Giamber acknowledges. Chesapeake Energy, one of the largest companies in the industry, announced last week an agreement with the Wyoming County Landowners group for a 5-year, 20-percent royalty lease with a $5,750 sign-on bonus.

A landowners’ group near Giamber, the South West Ross Township Property Group, says it’s in talks with an undisclosed company whose offer is in the same “ballpark,” according to Ken Long, a member of the group’s executive committee. Long would neither confirm nor deny that it’s Chesapeake.

Still, Giamber believes the math of his deal could work better. “The fat lady hasn’t sung yet,” he said in an e-mail. “Let’s say I get a well three years before my neighbor that signed with Chesapeake at $5,500 (per-acre bonus). I’m still ahead. The variables are many and the future too hard to predict. I am just happy that WhitMar is moving forward by drilling the first wells in Luzerne County.”

Copyright: Times Leader

Firm with substantial holdings in Luzerne County taking next step toward exploration.

By Rory Sweeneyrsweeney@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

WhitMar Exploration Co., the only gas-drilling company so far to have leased substantially in Luzerne County, plans to begin drilling by the middle or latter part of next year, according to the company’s president.

“Right now, we’re just filing for some permits for two, possibly three wells we want to drill,” said Whit Marvin, who heads the Denver-based company. “We do plan on drilling it and testing it for the Marcellus Shale.”

Throughout 2009, WhitMar has leased more than 22,000 acres in, among other places, Fairmount, Ross, Lake, Lehman, Union, Hunlock, Huntington and Dallas townships with little money upfront by offering landowners a contractual guarantee to begin drilling within two years.

The contract also guaranteed permitting within the first year, and Marvin said that process is on track. The company is filing for drilling and water-consumption permits from the state Department of Environmental Protection and the Susquehanna River Basin Commission, and is looking into any other permits it might need, he said.

From there, the company will negotiate with the individual landowners about siting for the well pads and gaining access to them, he said.

Much of that will be based seismic testing that’s being done, the results of which Marvin expects before the end of the year. “In essence, you’re using ultrasound. You’re looking for anomalies under the surface … that would be attractive to drill into,” he said. “We can make some geologic interpretation, (but) it’s definitely not an exact science.”

A drilling contractor hasn’t been hired yet, he said, but the company has begun work elsewhere in the shale. It has leased “large blocks” in Lycoming, Wayne and Susquehanna counties, as well as in some counties in New York’s southern tier, he said. Of that, wells are being drilled in Chemung County, N.Y., and preparations for drilling are being made in Susquehanna and Lycoming counties, he said.

In Lycoming County, the industry is moving so fast that companies needing and offering services aren’t able to connect, according to Jeffrey Lorson, an industrial technology specialist at the Pennsylvania College of Technology.

For that reason, the college and a group of organizations interested in the industry are sponsoring a business-networking expo today. Lorson, who heads the college’s Marcellus Shale Education & Training Center, said about 130 vendors are scheduled to be at the free-admission event at the Hughesville Fairgrounds.

If you go

What: Business-networking expo for the gas-drilling industry

Where: Hughesville Fairgrounds, Lycoming County

When: Today, 10 a.m. to 3 p.m.

Description: About 130 vendors are meeting to display their goods and services, and to see the goods and services other companies are offering.

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader

Some landowners holding back, banking on economic improvement to bring better offers from drillers.

By Rory Sweeneyrsweeney@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

The offer is somewhat unconventional, but a natural gas company that’s leasing land in Luzerne County says its deal is a successful compromise for both parties, and leaseholders agree.

Denver-based WhitMar has locked up more than 22,000 acres in, among other places, Fairmount, Ross, Lake, Lehman, Union, Hunlock, Huntington and Dallas townships, according to company representative Brad Shepard.

The company is offering an unusual deal that has garnered both accolades from landowners for navigating the money squeeze caused by the recession and criticism for its lack of a long-term commitment. WhitMar, which Shepard said is involved in similarly complicated and expensive drilling operations in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, Utah and the Dakotas, is offering a four-phase lease.

Landowners receive $12.50 per acre for the first year, after which the company decides whether it will continue the lease for a second year at the same payment rate. The lease also requires that within the first year the company begin the permit process for drilling at least one well and within the second year begin drilling at least one well.

For the third year, the company will offer a $2,500-per-acre, five-year lease on the properties it wants to keep, and landowners whose land gets drilled also will receive 19.5-percent royalties. Conservation Services, the company that amassed most of the territory, receives .5 percent of the royalties.

“As far as I know, that’s the highest royalty that’s been signed in Pennsylvania or New York,” Shepard said. “The reason we offered that royalty is literally because the landowners were willing to let us come in and test it up for $12.50” per acre.

The company then retains an option for a second five-year, $2,500-per-acre lease. “All together, it could be a 12-year lease,” Shepard said, but noted that the leases dissolve if the landowners aren’t paid. “So if they don’t receive a $2,500 payment or a $12.50 payment, the lease has expired because we didn’t pay them like we said we would.”

The offer has aroused reactions on both sides among affected landowners. Some urge restraint, predicting that better offers will crop up when the economy rebounds. “Right now, (gas companies) are picking all this low-hanging fruit,” said Ken Long, an executive committee member of the South West Ross Township Property Group that declined to recommend WhitMar’s offer to their group. “People are panicking to sign leases … because they want to get this monkey off their back.”

Landowners who signed leases note the generous royalties and the commitment to quickly begin exploration drilling. “I firmly believe that a sweeter, more lucrative deal can not be found in Luzerne County,” leaseholder Michael Giamber noted in an e-mail. “By comparison, the folks in Dimock (a truly proven area) can only get 18 percent. Over 30 years, a 2-percent difference in royalties can literally add millions of dollars in a landowner’s pocket.”

Shepard added that forced drilling likely means additional drilling will occur. “For the most part, once the drill rig’s brought in, it’s not brought in to drill one well,” he said. “As long as they hit, we have every intention of drilling as quickly as we can and our partner wants us.”

The company is still working out important specifics, though. First, it needs to find a larger partner to help drill, Shepard said, and it also must secure the rights to millions of gallons of water for the process that cracks the underground shale and releases gas.

In nearby counties, the company is working with Houston-based Carrizo Oil & Gas, Fort Worth-based XTO Energy, Inc., Louisiana-based Stone Energy Corp. and others, Shepard said.

He added that the company has received many offers from landowners to sell surface water on their properties, but said the company is not yet at the stage where it’s investigating water-acquisition options.

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader

Industry reps cite permitting delays; DEP head says issues to be resolved.

DALLAS TWP. – Representatives from every aspect of the state’s burgeoning natural-gas drilling industry met on Tuesday and, though differing on specifics, emphasized that Pennsylvanians stand upon a multibillion-dollar windfall, but only if the state streamlines its permitting process.

The hearing at Misericordia University was organized by the state Senate Republicans’ policy committee to identify potential problems with drilling the Marcellus Shale about a mile underground, but the senators instead were told that many of the problems lie with the state itself.

“Fundamentally, what the industry has said to us is, ‘We need to know what the rules are,’” said Tom Beauduy, the deputy director of the Susquehanna River Basin Commission. The commission oversees water removal from the river basin.

Industry representatives were dire with their characterizations. The industry is experiencing “permitting delays unlike we have ever seen in any other state,” said Wendy Straatmann, president of Ohio-based Exco-North Coast Energy Inc. “Why would I spend so much of our company’s time and resources when I can go to some other state and use the gas and oil manual and follow the regulations?”

Ray Walker, a vice president with Texas-based Range Resources Corp., agreed that an inclusive regulations manual would help companies “put our money into protecting the environment and not paperwork.” He noted that smaller companies are considering drilling here, but won’t if the permitting process remains slow and taxes increase. That could keep development slow, he said.

That’s a prospect that few at the hearing wanted. John Hanger, the acting secretary of the state Department of Environmental Protection, assured that his agency was “working to make sure that gas can be produced and water protected.” Part of the lag has come from a dearth of disposal options for the fluids used to hydraulically fracture the rock, and Hanger said his favored alternative was to find ways for the companies to simply inject them underground.

DEP would need to increase its regulatory force to keep up with the permitting and inspections demand predicted based on industry desires, he said, noting the department has recently requested substantially increasing its well-permitting fees.

Still the Republican senators felt DEP is clamping down too tightly. “When I ran for Senate, I was mad at the state for over-regulating my industry,” said Sen. Mary Jo White, R-Venango County, who had worked for an oil corporation. “I think we’re heading down that road again.”

William Brackett, the managing editor of a newsletter that reports on the Barnett Shale, said gas drilling there “is a prime reason the north Texas economy has only caught a cold and not the flu.”

John Hanger, acting DEP secretary, said part of the lag has come from a dearth of disposal options for the fluids used to hydraulically fracture the rock.

Copyright: Times Leader

Industry reps cite permitting delays; DEP head says issues to be resolved.

DALLAS TWP. – Representatives from every aspect of the state’s burgeoning natural-gas drilling industry met on Tuesday and, though differing on specifics, emphasized that Pennsylvanians stand upon a multibillion-dollar windfall, but only if the state streamlines its permitting process.

The hearing at Misericordia University was organized by the state Senate Republicans’ policy committee to identify potential problems with drilling the Marcellus Shale about a mile underground, but the senators instead were told that many of the problems lie with the state itself.

“Fundamentally, what the industry has said to us is, ‘We need to know what the rules are,’” said Tom Beauduy, the deputy director of the Susquehanna River Basin Commission. The commission oversees water removal from the river basin.

Industry representatives were dire with their characterizations. The industry is experiencing “permitting delays unlike we have ever seen in any other state,” said Wendy Straatmann, president of Ohio-based Exco-North Coast Energy Inc. “Why would I spend so much of our company’s time and resources when I can go to some other state and use the gas and oil manual and follow the regulations?”

Ray Walker, a vice president with Texas-based Range Resources Corp., agreed that an inclusive regulations manual would help companies “put our money into protecting the environment and not paperwork.” He noted that smaller companies are considering drilling here, but won’t if the permitting process remains slow and taxes increase. That could keep development slow, he said.

That’s a prospect that few at the hearing wanted. John Hanger, the acting secretary of the state Department of Environmental Protection, assured that his agency was “working to make sure that gas can be produced and water protected.” Part of the lag has come from a dearth of disposal options for the fluids used to hydraulically fracture the rock, and Hanger said his favored alternative was to find ways for the companies to simply inject them underground.

DEP would need to increase its regulatory force to keep up with the permitting and inspections demand predicted based on industry desires, he said, noting the department has recently requested substantially increasing its well-permitting fees.

Still the Republican senators felt DEP is clamping down too tightly. “When I ran for Senate, I was mad at the state for over-regulating my industry,” said Sen. Mary Jo White, R-Venango County, who had worked for an oil corporation. “I think we’re heading down that road again.”

William Brackett, the managing editor of a newsletter that reports on the Barnett Shale, said gas drilling there “is a prime reason the north Texas economy has only caught a cold and not the flu.”

John Hanger, acting DEP secretary, said part of the lag has come from a dearth of disposal options for the fluids used to hydraulically fracture the rock.

Copyright: Times Leader



Gas industry officials told state senators in Dallas that cumbersome rules make it difficult to operate.

MICHAEL RUBINKAM Associated Press Writer

DALLAS — Executives of drilling companies exploring a huge untapped reserve of natural gas say the economic windfall expected from the Marcellus Shale may not come to pass if Pennsylvania doesn’t get its regulatory house in order.

Industry officials complained Tuesday about a time-consuming and lengthy permitting process and cumbersome regulations that, on top of plummeting natural gas prices and the credit crisis, is making it difficult for them to operate in Pennsylvania.

“I have great hopes for what the Marcellus Shale play might still hold for Pennsylvania. Unfortunately, my experience to date does not lead me to be very optimistic,” Wendy Straatman, president of Exco-North Coast Energy Inc., told Republican state senators at a hearing in northeastern Pennsylvania.

She said the Akron, Ohio-based company has moved drilling equipment to West Virginia and delayed its plan to transfer a “significant number” of employees into Pennsylvania because of DEP permitting delays that are “unlike anything we have seen in any other state in which we operate.”

Another executive, Scott Rotruck of Oklahoma City-based Chesapeake Energy Corp., the largest natural gas producer in the United States, predicted “ominous” consequences for Marcellus development if Pennsylvania’s regulatory environment doesn’t become more welcoming. He said the permitting process is easier and less costly in other states.

Sympathetic GOP senators pressed acting Environmental Secretary John Hanger for answers, warning that Pennsylvania can’t afford to scare off an industry that has promised to create tens of thousands of new jobs.

The state needs to be “careful we are not killing the goose that’s laying the golden egg,” said Sen. Mary Jo White, R-Venango.

Hanger agreed that regulations need to be streamlined and said his agency is working on it, but added that most applications are processed within 45 days.

“There has to be a smart way to protect what we need to protect, and at the same time (prevent) a delay that really serves no purpose,” he said. “I believe there’s a learning curve here for everyone involved.”

Part of the problem may be a lack of DEP manpower to cope with a record number of natural gas applications. The agency is on track to issue 8,000 permits in 2008, up from 2,000 in 1999, yet staffing in the agency’s oil and gas division has remained stable at about 80. The DEP has proposed to raise fees on drilling companies to pay for additional staff to process applications and inspect wells.

Tuesday’s hearing at Misericordia University was called by the Senate Majority Policy Committee to explore the economic and environmental impact of drilling in the Marcellus, a layer of rock deep underground that experts say holds vast stores of largely untapped natural gas.

Industry executives also opposed a tax on natural gas that the administration of Gov. Ed Rendell has said it is considering.

“New taxes will stymie Marcellus development,” said Ray Walker Jr., vice president of Range Resources Corp., a Texas-based oil and gas company with an office in southwestern Pennsylvania.

Copyright: Times Leader

Texans to share their experiences

HUGHESVILLE – As night falls over Beaver Lake Road, work lights gradually accentuate a towering structure visible between the rolling hills. In the middle of a roughly square-acre site, the drilling rig is about halfway through a four-week stay at this rural Lycoming County site.

Soon thereafter, the rig will leave, crews will arrive to tap the natural-gas well, gas will begin being pumped into regional transmission pipelines and Chief Oil & Gas LLC of Dallas, Texas, will begin reaping income.

So will Neil and Louise Barto, though hardly what they say they deserve. They signed over the mineral rights to their nearly 178 acres three years ago for $888.45 and the state-minimum 12.5-percent royalties on the production.

“Everybody made money except us,” Neil Barto said. “Hell yes, it irritates me. … Every time I see somebody from Chief, I tell them I’m not happy about it.”

That’s the sort of cautionary tale the Joint Urban Studies Center is hoping to keep to a minimum in the area by hosting the Marcellus Shale Symposium on Nov. 19 at the Woodlands Inn & Resort in Plains Township. Cost is $30. The symposium will feature experts from the Fort Worth area, which witnessed during the past two decades a historical revolution as the oil and gas industry figured out how to tap gas stores under urban centers.

“The energy companies are used to operating out in rural areas where there’s nothing to bother but some cows and horses and whatnot,” said Will Brackett, the managing editor of the weekly Powell Barnett Shale Newsletter. With people came environmental concerns, landowners organizing to leverage better offers and opposition from those left out of the Barnett Shale windfall.

John Baen, a real estate professor at the University of North Texas, said he’s in a unique position to comment on the Marcellus because he used to fish in the Susquehanna River growing up as a boy, but also watched 9,000 wells be drilled in five Texas counties within seven years. “We had a lot of people who said, ‘Not in my back yard,’ then we had a lot of people who said, ‘Well maybe,’ and people who said, ‘Drill every square foot,’” he said.

Brackett noted that people who hadn’t finished high school were landing $50,000-per-year jobs, making it difficult for other industries to keep workers. As the companies struck more and more hydrocarbon gold, they offered leases to ever more landowners, who began organizing and using the Internet to publicize offers. Bidding wars erupted, with offers at $25,000 per acre and 25-percent royalties on production. “It got to be, I’d have to say, surreal around here,” he said. “Last year, if you went to a party, everyone was talking about the Barnett Shale.”

One of the most important steps to expanding exploitation of the shale is placating objectors, Baen said.

“I have a theory that everyone should be a stakeholder, and everybody should win,” he said. “It might take some pretty big changes in some of your laws up there to have everybody benefit.”

He noted that Texas has no state income tax, but that every mineral-rights owner pays a severance tax that has left the state with an $11-billion overabundance.

Both Brackett and Baen agree Pennsylvania and its citizens stand to benefit extensively from the advances made in Fort Worth in recent years, but only if the state refocuses its mineral-rights policies from coal to gas and oil.

“I’m calling it the Jewel of the Northeast,” Baen said, but “will it be allowed to be developed? And it may not.”

If the state legislature doesn’t act quickly, he predicted the economic benefit could be delayed up to five years.

Copyright: Times Leader