Posts Tagged ‘experienced gas-law attorney’
Wyoming County gas agreement called compromise
Landowners in Wyoming County get some good protections, attorney says.
By Rory Sweeneyrsweeney@timesleader.com
Staff Writer
The lease that Chesapeake Energy is offering to Wyoming County Landowners group members is clearly a compromise between landowners and the company, according to an experienced gas-law attorney, but includes “many of the protections that we like to see for landowners are built into this lease.”
Dale Tice, an attorney with Williamsport-based Greevy and Associates who has clients in the Wyoming group, characterized the wording in the lease offer as “very competitive with the leases we’ve seen.”
Tice, whose office has gained somewhat of an expertise in gas law since companies began descending on Lycoming County a few years ago, said he usually disapproves of a five-year re-leasing option being available to companies, but noted that it’s “understandable” why Chesapeake would want that because it’s leasing so much land that it will take years to explore the whole area.
He also said that the $20-per-year fee paid if a well is shut off to eliminate production during a bad market “is as good as they’re going to do.”
While Tice declined to identify negatives in the lease and cautioned that his comments shouldn’t be construed as legal advice, he noted several positives: including in-depth wording to limit production-unit sizes, termination of the lease on land that isn’t part of a production unit, the company’s responsibility to pay property-tax rollbacks on Clean and Green properties and mutual written agreement on placement for wells, pipelines and other infrastructure. Additionally, he said, the lease requires that all infrastructure sited on a property must be tied into gas production at the property.
“There’s always somewhat of a question there because, although the gas company and the landowner must mutually agree in writing as to the location, the gas companies always add some language that says lessors can’t be unreasonable” about siting infrastructure, he said.
Though there is no specific reference to siting waste-deposit wells on the properties, “sometimes,” he said, “if they (landowners) don’t give them (drilling companies) the right, they don’t need to take it out, so to speak.”
The lease is “clearly the product of extensive dialogue between the parties,” Tice said. “I think this does a good job of striking a compromise where the landowner has a lot of good protections worked into it.”
Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.
Copyright: Times Leader