Posts Tagged ‘gas production’

The Associated Press

HARRISBURG — Pennsylvania will join other major natural-gas states in requiring the prompt disclosure of production results.

State senators unanimously approved the measure Tuesday, six days after the House did the same. Gov. Ed Rendell is expected to sign it.

State legislators are peeling back the cloak of secrecy just as exploration companies are flocking to Pennsylvania in pursuit of natural gas in the sprawling Marcellus Shale formation.

The measure will require the disclosure of well-specific production data every six months. Currently, a 25-year-old state law requires state regulators to keep oil and gas production data confidential for five years.

Supporters say faster disclosure will help companies harvest the gas and let landowners see whether they are getting the royalties they are owed.

Copyright: Times Leader

Landowners in Wyoming County get some good protections, attorney says.

By Rory Sweeneyrsweeney@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

The lease that Chesapeake Energy is offering to Wyoming County Landowners group members is clearly a compromise between landowners and the company, according to an experienced gas-law attorney, but includes “many of the protections that we like to see for landowners are built into this lease.”

Dale Tice, an attorney with Williamsport-based Greevy and Associates who has clients in the Wyoming group, characterized the wording in the lease offer as “very competitive with the leases we’ve seen.”

Tice, whose office has gained somewhat of an expertise in gas law since companies began descending on Lycoming County a few years ago, said he usually disapproves of a five-year re-leasing option being available to companies, but noted that it’s “understandable” why Chesapeake would want that because it’s leasing so much land that it will take years to explore the whole area.

He also said that the $20-per-year fee paid if a well is shut off to eliminate production during a bad market “is as good as they’re going to do.”

While Tice declined to identify negatives in the lease and cautioned that his comments shouldn’t be construed as legal advice, he noted several positives: including in-depth wording to limit production-unit sizes, termination of the lease on land that isn’t part of a production unit, the company’s responsibility to pay property-tax rollbacks on Clean and Green properties and mutual written agreement on placement for wells, pipelines and other infrastructure. Additionally, he said, the lease requires that all infrastructure sited on a property must be tied into gas production at the property.

“There’s always somewhat of a question there because, although the gas company and the landowner must mutually agree in writing as to the location, the gas companies always add some language that says lessors can’t be unreasonable” about siting infrastructure, he said.

Though there is no specific reference to siting waste-deposit wells on the properties, “sometimes,” he said, “if they (landowners) don’t give them (drilling companies) the right, they don’t need to take it out, so to speak.”

The lease is “clearly the product of extensive dialogue between the parties,” Tice said. “I think this does a good job of striking a compromise where the landowner has a lot of good protections worked into it.”

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader

The Associated Press

HARRISBURG — Republicans in Pennsylvania’s House of Representatives are proposing a plan to expand natural gas drilling on 390,000 additional acres of state forest land.

The Republicans proposed the plan Tuesday as an alternative to Democratic Gov. Ed Rendell’s plan to impose a severance tax on natural gas production.

Drilling is a major issue in Pennsylvania since exploration companies are eager to tap the natural gas trapped in the Marcellus Shale rock formation.

Republicans say the leasing under their plan would take place over the next three years and provide $260 million per year.

Rendell expects his 5 percent tax on gas production to provide $236 million to the state budget in its first full year.

The state raised $190 million last year by leasing 74,000 acres of state forest to drilling companies.

Copyright: Times Leader

By MARC LEVY Associated Press Writer

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) _ The land agents, geologists and drilling crews rushing after the Marcellus Shale are raising something besides the natural gas they’re seeking: Talk of a natural gas tax.

Thanks to a state Supreme Court decision six years ago, Pennsylvania is now one of the biggest natural-gas producing states — if not the biggest — that does not tax the methane sucked from beneath its ground.

But momentum is gathering to impose such a tax. The Marcellus Shale — a layer of black rock that holds a vast reservoir of gas — is luring some of the country’s largest gas producers to Pennsylvania, and state government revenues are being waylaid by a worldwide economic malaise.

A spokesman for Gov. Ed Rendell says the administration is looking at the idea of a tax on natural gas, but a decision has not been made. Typically, Rendell does not reveal any tax or revenue proposals until his official budget plan is introduced each February.

Senate Republicans are planning a November hearing at Misericordia University in northeastern Pennsylvania to look at what effect can be expected on local governments if Marcellus Shale production lives up to its potential.

Local officials worry about damage to local roads ill-suited for heavy truck traffic and equipment. School districts could be strained by families of gas company employees moving into town. And some residents are concerned about gas wells disrupting or polluting the water tables from which they draw drinking water.

Legislators must find the fairest way for companies to share those costs, whether by levying a tax or through some other means, said Sen. Jake Corman, R-Centre, the GOP’s policy chairman.

“I do think there is an understanding that some sort of compensation for municipalities is warranted,” Corman said. “We just have to figure out the best way to do that.”

So far, drilling activity is under way on the Marcellus Shale in at least 18 counties, primarily in the northern tier and southwest where the shale is thickest, according to the state Department of Environmental Protection.

Land agents are trooping in and out of county courthouses to research the below-ground mineral rights. At least several million acres above the Marcellus Shale have been leased by companies in West Virginia, New York and Pennsylvania.

Just this week, Range Resources Corp. and a Denver-based gas processor said they have started up Pennsylvania’s first large-scale gas processing plant, about 20 miles south of Pittsburgh.

And CNX Gas Corp. announced that a $6 million horizontal well it drilled in southwest Pennsylvania is producing a respectable 1.2 million cubic feet a day — a rate it expects to improve in coming weeks.

In the opposite corner of Pennsylvania, drilling pads are now visible on Susquehanna County’s farmland, and hotel rooms are booked with land agents and drilling crews.

“It is the talk at the coffee shops, at the local grocery store, the gas station — everybody,” said state Sen. Lisa Baker, R-Luzerne.

Activity is still in the early stages, as exploration companies work to confirm their basic assumptions about the potential of the Marcellus Shale reservoir, and probe for the spots with the greatest promise, analysts say.

Industry representatives say they oppose a tax, and Stephen W. Rhoads, the president of the Pennsylvania Oil and Gas Association, questioned the wisdom of imposing a tax on gas production that is still speculative.

In some natural-gas states, a tax is collected based on a company’s gas production by volume.

But in Pennsylvania, the Supreme Court ruled in 2002 that state law did not allow counties, schools and municipalities to impose a real estate tax based on the value of the subsurface oil and gas rights held by exploration companies.

An appraiser’s study presented last year during a House Finance Committee hearing estimated that the court’s decision had cost Greene, Fayette and Washington counties up to $30 million in county, school and municipal tax revenue.

The state’s county commissioners and school boards support the resumption of some type of taxing authority — although that could mean landowners would get smaller royalty checks.

Regardless, Doug Hill, the executive director of the County Commissioners Association of Pennsylvania, said the matter is one of basic fairness since coal, gravel and limestone are assessed.

“The bottom line is it isn’t a windfall issue,” Hill said. “It’s a tax equity issue.”

___

Marc Levy covers state government for The Associated Press in Harrisburg. He can be reached at mlevy(at)ap.org.

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press.