Posts Tagged ‘gas’

More than 650 acres are available. Drilling firms being contacted directly.

By Rory Sweeneyrsweeney@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

Luzerne County began seeking bids Monday to lease more than 650 acres at Moon Lake Park for natural gas drilling.

In an effort to entice a bidder, county engineer Joe Gibbons said he is contacting drilling companies directly.

“I’m trying to swing it in our favor. I’m sending e-mails out to the gas industry to see if anyone’s interested in receiving a set of bid documents,” he said. “It’s up in the air because the commodities are in the tank right now. … I’m kind of optimistic. I hope we get somebody.”

Potential bidders can review and pick up the documents at the county property and supply office in Penn Place at 20 N. Pennsylvania Ave., Wilkes-Barre. The bids are due by 2 p.m. April 23, but must be pre-qualified by April 9.

The proposal is modeled, Gibbons said, on that used by the state Department of Conservation and Natural Resources.

The request for proposals was structured, he said, so that the county receives several revenue sources from the deal and retains authority over where drill pads would be located in the park. “The last thing I want to do is make the place look like an open construction site. I want to maintain its recreational integrity. It’s just a unique project,” he said.

The county would receive income from the rental of the drilled acreage; the sale of the timber felled when preparing the drilling sites; other marketable fluids, such as methane or oil, that are extracted from the drilling; and storage fees for gas that is stored when an exploratory well is drilled, but capped until it can be hooked up to a pipeline, he said. “They can have the storage, that’s fine, but we get the storage rental,” he said.

All bidders would have to offer at least 16 percent royalties on the price at the well head for any marketable fluids it produces, he said.

The winning bidder will offer the highest initial-year rental fee for the acreage, he said, which was set for at least $500 per acre. After that, the fee drops to between $10 and $20 per year, he said, but there is a stipulation that drilling begin within a year.

The winning bidder would post three bonds, including one to ensure the site is restored after drilling concludes, he said. “I put restrictions on where they could take water from and how much they could take, even above and beyond what DEP (the state Department of Environmental Protection) would issue in a mining permit,” he said.

The bids would also have to be pre-qualified to ensure they are from actual drilling companies planning development and not land-holding companies expecting to resell the land, he said. “If we do get a lease, I want to deal directly with the gas company. I don’t want to go through a middle man,” he said.

Copyright: Times Leader

Harveys Lake officials cite environmental concerns in opposing the water use.

EILEEN GODIN Times Leader Correspondent

HARVEYS LAKE – Council members on Tuesday night voiced concerns over a gas company’s interest in using lake water for the drilling of the Marcellus Shale.

Environmental scientists from Gannett Fleming Engineering are interested in drilling in the Marcellus Shale region, which runs through Northeastern Pennsylvania. The shale contains pockets of natural gas.

The gas company wants to use 20 million gallons of water from Harveys Lake for a process called hydrofracing. Hydrofracing is the use of high pressure water to create cracks in the rock surrounding the shale so that the gas can be recovered.

Council Chairman Lawrence Lucarino said the shale is located a mile or more below the earth’s surface.

Council members say they oppose the practice because they are trying to protect the state’s largest natural lake.

But even though the council can deny it the use of the water, “the federal government can override the council’s decision,” Councilwoman Diane Dwyer said.

The council has asked attorney Charles D. McCormick to draft a letter stating the borough’s position and reasons against using the lake water.

“Who knows how well they will filter out the contaminants before letting the water back into the lake,” Dwyer said.

She asked residents to “please be watchdogs and keep an eye on your backyard.”

The Marcellus Shale fields are located in the Appalachian Basin, running through Pennsylvania, New York, Ohio and West Virginia. According to the Web site oilshalegas.com, the Appalachian Basin could provide 50 trillion cubic feet of natural gas for the United States. The United States now produces 30 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.

In other news, emergency 911 street maps have been returned to the borough. Council members Carole Samson and Charles Musial will review the maps to make sure all the street names are correct.

This process should take about one to two weeks, Samson said. Once approved by the borough, the maps will be sent to the County 911 office for final approval.

Copyright: Times Leader

Gas drillers’ access to Harveys Lake water doesn’t seem likely.

HARVEYS LAKE – The borough is girding itself against potential plans to use lake water for natural-gas drilling, but the state Department of Environmental Protection thinks attempting to gain access to the water might be more trouble than it’s worth.

At its recent monthly meeting, borough council had solicitor Charles McCormick write to the Susquehanna River Basin Commission noting in the letter that the council “strongly opposes &hellip any consumptive use of water from the tributary system of Harveys Lake.”

Council became concerned after receiving a phone call and a notice. The notice was of Chesapeake Energy’s request to increase its one-day water-removal limit from the basin to 20 million gallons, and the phone call was from an engineering firm representing a gas company.

Brent Ramsey, an environmental scientist with Harrisburg-based international engineering consulting firm Gannett Fleming, had asked who owned the water rights at the lake and if the water could be procured for a well-drilling client, borough secretary Susan Sutton said.

He also called the borough’s Environmental Advisory Council asking similar questions, EAC secretary Denise Sult said.

Ramsey said the client directed that the operation be kept confidential, but acknowledged that his company’s involvement is in securing water-use permitting and that approval for a source of water hasn’t yet been secured. He refused to comment on whether the lake was still a target or if other sources were being sought.

Tapping the lake’s resources might prove difficult, however, said DEP spokesman Mark Carmon. “There’s been a long-standing question mark about who owns the bottom of the lake,” he said. “It’s probably a lot more complicated that it’s worth, in a legal sense, for anybody.”

He said the borough doesn’t own the water and individual lakefront landowners would have to be contacted. Deeds would have to be checked for exact descriptions of how far out into the water each property border protrudes. Any user-landowner agreement would still need to get SRBC approval “and face the wrath of the neighbors on each side of them,” he said.

“We think that’s the way it would play out,” he said.

He said that he wasn’t aware of any proposals or approvals of water usage in Luzerne County for gas drilling.

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader

Gas industry officials told state senators in Dallas that cumbersome rules make it difficult to operate.

MICHAEL RUBINKAM Associated Press Writer

DALLAS — Executives of drilling companies exploring a huge untapped reserve of natural gas say the economic windfall expected from the Marcellus Shale may not come to pass if Pennsylvania doesn’t get its regulatory house in order.

Industry officials complained Tuesday about a time-consuming and lengthy permitting process and cumbersome regulations that, on top of plummeting natural gas prices and the credit crisis, is making it difficult for them to operate in Pennsylvania.

“I have great hopes for what the Marcellus Shale play might still hold for Pennsylvania. Unfortunately, my experience to date does not lead me to be very optimistic,” Wendy Straatman, president of Exco-North Coast Energy Inc., told Republican state senators at a hearing in northeastern Pennsylvania.

She said the Akron, Ohio-based company has moved drilling equipment to West Virginia and delayed its plan to transfer a “significant number” of employees into Pennsylvania because of DEP permitting delays that are “unlike anything we have seen in any other state in which we operate.”

Another executive, Scott Rotruck of Oklahoma City-based Chesapeake Energy Corp., the largest natural gas producer in the United States, predicted “ominous” consequences for Marcellus development if Pennsylvania’s regulatory environment doesn’t become more welcoming. He said the permitting process is easier and less costly in other states.

Sympathetic GOP senators pressed acting Environmental Secretary John Hanger for answers, warning that Pennsylvania can’t afford to scare off an industry that has promised to create tens of thousands of new jobs.

The state needs to be “careful we are not killing the goose that’s laying the golden egg,” said Sen. Mary Jo White, R-Venango.

Hanger agreed that regulations need to be streamlined and said his agency is working on it, but added that most applications are processed within 45 days.

“There has to be a smart way to protect what we need to protect, and at the same time (prevent) a delay that really serves no purpose,” he said. “I believe there’s a learning curve here for everyone involved.”

Part of the problem may be a lack of DEP manpower to cope with a record number of natural gas applications. The agency is on track to issue 8,000 permits in 2008, up from 2,000 in 1999, yet staffing in the agency’s oil and gas division has remained stable at about 80. The DEP has proposed to raise fees on drilling companies to pay for additional staff to process applications and inspect wells.

Tuesday’s hearing at Misericordia University was called by the Senate Majority Policy Committee to explore the economic and environmental impact of drilling in the Marcellus, a layer of rock deep underground that experts say holds vast stores of largely untapped natural gas.

Industry executives also opposed a tax on natural gas that the administration of Gov. Ed Rendell has said it is considering.

“New taxes will stymie Marcellus development,” said Ray Walker Jr., vice president of Range Resources Corp., a Texas-based oil and gas company with an office in southwestern Pennsylvania.

Copyright: Times Leader

Texans to share their experiences

HUGHESVILLE – As night falls over Beaver Lake Road, work lights gradually accentuate a towering structure visible between the rolling hills. In the middle of a roughly square-acre site, the drilling rig is about halfway through a four-week stay at this rural Lycoming County site.

Soon thereafter, the rig will leave, crews will arrive to tap the natural-gas well, gas will begin being pumped into regional transmission pipelines and Chief Oil & Gas LLC of Dallas, Texas, will begin reaping income.

So will Neil and Louise Barto, though hardly what they say they deserve. They signed over the mineral rights to their nearly 178 acres three years ago for $888.45 and the state-minimum 12.5-percent royalties on the production.

“Everybody made money except us,” Neil Barto said. “Hell yes, it irritates me. … Every time I see somebody from Chief, I tell them I’m not happy about it.”

That’s the sort of cautionary tale the Joint Urban Studies Center is hoping to keep to a minimum in the area by hosting the Marcellus Shale Symposium on Nov. 19 at the Woodlands Inn & Resort in Plains Township. Cost is $30. The symposium will feature experts from the Fort Worth area, which witnessed during the past two decades a historical revolution as the oil and gas industry figured out how to tap gas stores under urban centers.

“The energy companies are used to operating out in rural areas where there’s nothing to bother but some cows and horses and whatnot,” said Will Brackett, the managing editor of the weekly Powell Barnett Shale Newsletter. With people came environmental concerns, landowners organizing to leverage better offers and opposition from those left out of the Barnett Shale windfall.

John Baen, a real estate professor at the University of North Texas, said he’s in a unique position to comment on the Marcellus because he used to fish in the Susquehanna River growing up as a boy, but also watched 9,000 wells be drilled in five Texas counties within seven years. “We had a lot of people who said, ‘Not in my back yard,’ then we had a lot of people who said, ‘Well maybe,’ and people who said, ‘Drill every square foot,’” he said.

Brackett noted that people who hadn’t finished high school were landing $50,000-per-year jobs, making it difficult for other industries to keep workers. As the companies struck more and more hydrocarbon gold, they offered leases to ever more landowners, who began organizing and using the Internet to publicize offers. Bidding wars erupted, with offers at $25,000 per acre and 25-percent royalties on production. “It got to be, I’d have to say, surreal around here,” he said. “Last year, if you went to a party, everyone was talking about the Barnett Shale.”

One of the most important steps to expanding exploitation of the shale is placating objectors, Baen said.

“I have a theory that everyone should be a stakeholder, and everybody should win,” he said. “It might take some pretty big changes in some of your laws up there to have everybody benefit.”

He noted that Texas has no state income tax, but that every mineral-rights owner pays a severance tax that has left the state with an $11-billion overabundance.

Both Brackett and Baen agree Pennsylvania and its citizens stand to benefit extensively from the advances made in Fort Worth in recent years, but only if the state refocuses its mineral-rights policies from coal to gas and oil.

“I’m calling it the Jewel of the Northeast,” Baen said, but “will it be allowed to be developed? And it may not.”

If the state legislature doesn’t act quickly, he predicted the economic benefit could be delayed up to five years.

Copyright: Times Leader

By MARC LEVY Associated Press Writer

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) _ The land agents, geologists and drilling crews rushing after the Marcellus Shale are raising something besides the natural gas they’re seeking: Talk of a natural gas tax.

Thanks to a state Supreme Court decision six years ago, Pennsylvania is now one of the biggest natural-gas producing states — if not the biggest — that does not tax the methane sucked from beneath its ground.

But momentum is gathering to impose such a tax. The Marcellus Shale — a layer of black rock that holds a vast reservoir of gas — is luring some of the country’s largest gas producers to Pennsylvania, and state government revenues are being waylaid by a worldwide economic malaise.

A spokesman for Gov. Ed Rendell says the administration is looking at the idea of a tax on natural gas, but a decision has not been made. Typically, Rendell does not reveal any tax or revenue proposals until his official budget plan is introduced each February.

Senate Republicans are planning a November hearing at Misericordia University in northeastern Pennsylvania to look at what effect can be expected on local governments if Marcellus Shale production lives up to its potential.

Local officials worry about damage to local roads ill-suited for heavy truck traffic and equipment. School districts could be strained by families of gas company employees moving into town. And some residents are concerned about gas wells disrupting or polluting the water tables from which they draw drinking water.

Legislators must find the fairest way for companies to share those costs, whether by levying a tax or through some other means, said Sen. Jake Corman, R-Centre, the GOP’s policy chairman.

“I do think there is an understanding that some sort of compensation for municipalities is warranted,” Corman said. “We just have to figure out the best way to do that.”

So far, drilling activity is under way on the Marcellus Shale in at least 18 counties, primarily in the northern tier and southwest where the shale is thickest, according to the state Department of Environmental Protection.

Land agents are trooping in and out of county courthouses to research the below-ground mineral rights. At least several million acres above the Marcellus Shale have been leased by companies in West Virginia, New York and Pennsylvania.

Just this week, Range Resources Corp. and a Denver-based gas processor said they have started up Pennsylvania’s first large-scale gas processing plant, about 20 miles south of Pittsburgh.

And CNX Gas Corp. announced that a $6 million horizontal well it drilled in southwest Pennsylvania is producing a respectable 1.2 million cubic feet a day — a rate it expects to improve in coming weeks.

In the opposite corner of Pennsylvania, drilling pads are now visible on Susquehanna County’s farmland, and hotel rooms are booked with land agents and drilling crews.

“It is the talk at the coffee shops, at the local grocery store, the gas station — everybody,” said state Sen. Lisa Baker, R-Luzerne.

Activity is still in the early stages, as exploration companies work to confirm their basic assumptions about the potential of the Marcellus Shale reservoir, and probe for the spots with the greatest promise, analysts say.

Industry representatives say they oppose a tax, and Stephen W. Rhoads, the president of the Pennsylvania Oil and Gas Association, questioned the wisdom of imposing a tax on gas production that is still speculative.

In some natural-gas states, a tax is collected based on a company’s gas production by volume.

But in Pennsylvania, the Supreme Court ruled in 2002 that state law did not allow counties, schools and municipalities to impose a real estate tax based on the value of the subsurface oil and gas rights held by exploration companies.

An appraiser’s study presented last year during a House Finance Committee hearing estimated that the court’s decision had cost Greene, Fayette and Washington counties up to $30 million in county, school and municipal tax revenue.

The state’s county commissioners and school boards support the resumption of some type of taxing authority — although that could mean landowners would get smaller royalty checks.

Regardless, Doug Hill, the executive director of the County Commissioners Association of Pennsylvania, said the matter is one of basic fairness since coal, gravel and limestone are assessed.

“The bottom line is it isn’t a windfall issue,” Hill said. “It’s a tax equity issue.”

___

Marc Levy covers state government for The Associated Press in Harrisburg. He can be reached at mlevy(at)ap.org.

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press.

Property owners claim in lawsuit agent offered lower royalty than allowed by law.

MARC LEVY Associated Press Writer

HARRISBURG — Scores of people who own land above a potentially lucrative natural gas reservoir are seeking to void the drilling leases they signed and accused a land agent of guaranteeing a lower royalty than the amount allowed by state law.

The property owners filed a lawsuit in federal court in Williamsport last week against The Keeton Group LLC, of Lexington, Ky.

The lawsuit stems from a rush of activity by exploration companies to capitalize on the largely untapped Marcellus Shale gas reservoir while natural gas prices are high. Property owners from West Virginia to New York have complained of aggressive “landmen” pushing them to sign leases that allow an exploration company to drill down to the Marcellus Shale, a layer of thick black rock that holds a vast reservoir of gas.

The law cited by the plaintiffs guarantees a property owner at least one-eighth of the royalties from the recovery of oil and gas on their land. However, the suit said the leases violate state law because they give the exploration company the right to subtract taxes, assessments and adjustments on production from the 12.5 percent royalty.

The suit, filed Thursday, said the approximately 130 plaintiffs own more than 18,000 acres in Sullivan and Lycoming counties in northern Pennsylvania. The contracts were signed with Keeton between April 2005 and March 2006, the suit said.

A telephone message left Tuesday with The Keeton Group was not immediately returned. On an outdated version of its Web site, Keeton touts its record as an early arrival on the Marcellus Shale.

“Our group was among the first to acquire lease rights for the current Marcellus Shale drilling activities — not only in Pennsylvania but also in 7 other states under which this vast geological formation lies,” the Keeton site said.

The gas reservoir beneath the Marcellus Shale was long known to exist, but only recently has drilling technology improved enough to cost-effectively tap into it. According to state officials, drilling activity on the formation is taking place at about 275 well sites, and less than 20 sites are producing gas.

To date, exploration companies have spent about $2 billion on leasing land, performing seismic studies and other activities in pursuit of Marcellus Shale gas in Pennsylvania, according to Stephen Rhoads, the president of the Pennsylvania Oil and Gas Association.

Companies as large as ExxonMobil Corp. have shown interest in Pennsylvania, which is one of four states that sit atop 54,000 square miles that analysts say hold the best exploration prospects.

Copyright: Times Leader

YOU CAN practically hear the Luzerne County Commissioners yelling: “Eureka! Thar’s treasure in them thar’ hills.”

The trio knows that – much like a century ago – a potential financial bonanza lies below our feet in the form of a coveted fuel. This time, it’s not anthracite.

Instead, companies aim to extract natural gas from deep below Northeastern Pennsylvania’s crust, using new drilling technology to tap a rock formation known as the Marcellus shale. The drillers, and speculators hoping to profit by hoarding land-lease agreements, have knocked on doors throughout the region, promising to put money in the pockets of cooperative property holders.

Luzerne County officials rightly recognize that this region’s (second) energy revolution offers a rare opportunity.

If handled properly, it can provide a much-needed source of relatively inexpensive fuel for home-heating and other purposes. Plus, the industry can be a significant money-maker for private landowners as well as public entities, including the commonwealth (which controls state forests and game lands) and the county.

Pennsylvania’s natural gas boom, therefore, deserves to be handled with extreme care so that current residents and future generations reap the full benefits. The approach will require specialized knowledge of geological, environmental and legal issues, coordination among all involved parties and patience.

With no disrespect intended, this is not a job for the Luzerne County Commissioners to attempt on their own.

Commissioner Greg Skrepenak’s proposal to create a gas exploration task force, which will involve professionals, makes sense in the short term. After studying the issue, however, this task force might decide it’s more sensible to combine efforts with a regional or statewide group that has even more expertise and can leverage the best deals on behalf of the taxpaying public.

The commissioners could vote as soon as Wednesday to request proposals for drilling in the county-owned Moon Lake Park area. What’s the rush? Most advisers have been telling private property owners that there is no need to leap on this bandwagon; indeed, better deals probably can be secured at a later time and by coordinating efforts with surrounding property owners rather than trying to compete with them.

In recent years the county has entered into some poorly arranged contracts, such as the juvenile detention center deal. The stakes are too high to botch this one.

Unfortunately, the current commissioners might see natural gas leases as an easy out – an escape from the burdensome budget deficits that have become all-too typical here in recent years. It would be a mistake, however, to make hasty decisions for short-term gain that could impact this region and its residents for the next century.

Luzerne County

officials rightly recognize that this region’s (second) energy revolution offers a rare opportunity.

Copyright: Times Leader

Commissioners consider asking for proposals to drill at Moon Lake Park.

Having witnessed the natural-gas drilling boom both in other counties and for some local residents, Luzerne County officials are considering the windfall potential for county lands.

At its meeting on Wednesday, the county commissioners are expected to approve issuing a request for proposals to drill in a little more than 2,000 acres in Moon Lake Park. They’ll also likely vote on creating a gas exploration task force proposed by Commissioner Greg Skrepenak.

Commissioner Steve Urban said he’s been following the gas progress for about six months and feels now is the time to offer the park lands because surrounding landowners are seeking leases as well.

“People are already interested in the land around Moon Lake, and I’m optimistic they’d be willing to talk to us,” he said. “It’s good to be proactive.”

He said the going rates seem to be between $2,600 and $3,200 signing bonuses per acre and perhaps 18 percent royalties.

Beyond the benefits to the county, he suggested local customers would find a benefit in receiving domestically produced natural gas.

He said the drilling wouldn’t affect plans to construct mountain-bike racing courses there.

Skrepenak said he’d likely support offering the lands for leasing, but said the county should have fully researched the topic first.

“I definitely think we need to take this issue as far as we can,” he said.

The task force would gather information, but also be a source for residents and local companies seeking work with the gas companies, he said. It should be made up of county officials, other public officers and experienced professionals, he said.

The shale drilling has shown to be “recession proof” in Texas, he said, which is why he finds it an exciting consideration. “It is the hot topic,” he said. “It’s been seen as a positive thing for the most part.”

Dave Skoronski, director of the county Geographic Information System/Mapping Department, noted there are promising signs that companies are considering the county. Several companies in related industries have come to his office to buy the county’s map data.

“They’ve been coming, and some people who work at the desk said they were doing gas research,” he said, noting that Burnett Oil Co., Inc., Mason Dixon Energy, Inc. and Elexco Land Services, Inc. have purchased map information.

Panel created

Luzerne County Commissioner Greg Skrepenak was named to the County Commissioners Association of Pennsylvania’s Natural Gas Task Force.

The group has been established to identify issues related to exploration and development of natural gas in Pennsylvania and to advise on policy related to those issues. Skrepenak participated in the task force’s first conference call on Sept. 26.

Copyright: Times Leader

By JOSEPH B. WHITE The Wall Street Journal

First it was ethanol made from corn. Then ethanol made from twigs and stems and trash. Then, the future was going to belong to hydrogen. Now, the alternative fuel flavor of the month in Washington is natural gas.

You may know this already, thanks to vigorous public-relations campaigns mounted to promote natural gas as a vehicle fuel by energy billionaire T. Boone Pickens and allies such as Chesapeake Energy Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Aubrey McClendon. Mr. Pickens touts natural gas as a fuel for cars as part of his broad “Pickens Plan” to reduce America’s dependence on foreign oil.

Mr. Pickens, in a television ad, summarizes his case for using natural gas as a vehicle fuel in nine words: “It’s cleaner. It’s cheaper. It’s abundant. And it’s ours.”

Nothing is ever that simple in the energy business. A lot of natural gas isn’t “ours.” It belongs to the same companies that currently supply us with oil, or to big gas utilities such as Ch esapeake. But Mr. Pickens is correct when he says that natural gas is abundant in the U.S. Recent advances in drilling technology have made it possible to exploit gas reserves that weren’t economical to tap before, such as the Marcellus Shale in the Appalachian region of the Northeastern U.S.

The macro problem that Mr. Pickens and gas industry executives need to solve is what to do with all that new gas – assuming it becomes available as forecast. Already, natural-gas prices have slumped about 40 percent since May. Grabbing some of petroleum’s more than 90 percent share of the U.S. vehicle fuels market is a smart strategy for the gas industry.

The question for consumers who don’t own shares in natural-gas companies is whether a compressed-gas fueled vehicle is a better deal than some other green technology, or the status quo.

The only natural gas car on the U.S. market right now is a Honda Civic GX. Honda Motor Co. let me borrow one for a few days to road t est the NGV (natural-gas vehicle) lifestyle.

Driving the Civic GX isn’t different than driving a standard, petrol-fueled car. My white test car had an automatic transmission and the usual bells and whistles. The adventure of driving a natural-gas fueled Civic only starts when the fuel gauge gets close to empty – and that happens fairly quickly because the car’s range is only 200 to 220 miles between fill-ups.

At this point, you’ll need an Internet connection to help you find a public natural-gas vehicle refueling station in your metro area. If you are fortunate will you find one in your ZIP code, because there are only about 1,100 natural-gas refueling stations in the U.S. The closest one to my house was about 18 miles away at a depot owned by the City of Ann Arbor.

The unmanned refueling station had an imposing looking pump with two hoses that dispensed compressed gas at different pressures. The Civic’s manual explained that I should use the one marked 360 0 pounds per square inch. Behind the Civic GX’s fuel door is a nozzle fitting. After a couple of tries, I got the fitting from the high-pressure hose properly locked on, and threw a lever on the pump to “On” to start the flow.

I realize it was irrational and techno-phobic to worry that I would somehow overfill the compressed gas tank on board the car and turn my Civic into an explosive device. Let’s say that I was nervous enough that I had done something wrong that when the pump shut off automatically, I was relieved, even though the system had only refilled the tank to the half-full mark. Mr. Pickens could add another element to his plan: It will create jobs for filling station attendants who can help nervous natural-gas newbies.

On the positive side, my natural gas was about half the price of the equivalent quantity of gasoline – $1.94 a gallon.

The Honda Civic GX illustrates almost perfectly the chicken-and-egg problems besetting efforts to wean personal transportation in the U.S. away from petroleum fuels.

Because there aren’t many natural-gas refueling stations, Honda only builds a couple of thousand natural-gas Civics a year, and other car makers are reluctant to push the technology to consumers. Because there are so few natural-gas vehicles, outside of commercial or government fleets, fuel retailers don’t have much incentive to sink $500,000 to $750,000 into a natural-gas refilling station capable of handling cars as rapidly as a conventional gas station can, says Richard Kolodziej, president of NGV America, a Washington advocacy group that represents about 100 natural-gas companies and other enterprises with a stake in promoting natural gas as a motor fuel.

Because there is little demand for natural-gas vehicles, the ones that are available come with a hefty price premium, in part because their fuel tanks aren’t molded plastic, but are instead heavily engineered, high-pressure tanks. A Civic GX lists for ab out $24,590, compared to about $17,760 for the mid-range Civic LX on which it is based. Tax credits can offset as much as $4,000 of that price. And in some states, natural-gas cars can use high-occupancy vehicle express lanes – a major perk for time-pressed commuters.

The Civic GX achieves about 24 miles to the gallon in the city and 36 on the highway, when its consumption is converted to gasoline equivalent miles per gallon, Honda says. The Environmental Protection Agency estimates the GX’s annual fuel costs at $884 a year, compared to $1,987 a year for a petroleum-fueled Civic. That indicates a payback, after the tax credit, of about 2½ years on the premium over the standard car.

One problem with the natural-gas Civic, Mr. Kolodziej concedes, is that it doesn’t look any different than a normal car. It doesn’t advertise the owner’s green cred the way a Prius does. “Where’s the sex in that?” He asks. “The sex comes in when you fill up for $10.”

Mr. Kolodzie j says he refuels his Civic GX using a Phill home-fueling system. This costs about $5,000 and allows a natural-gas vehicle owner to refuel overnight with gas from the lines running into the house. (A $1,000 tax credit is available for the Phill system.) But the hardware in Mr. Kolodziej’s garage isn’t all that’s different. He also says he doesn’t care that the vehicle has a limited range and takes hours to refill using the home refueling device.

“I go to work. I go to the store,” he says. “That’s what 99 percent of people do. Americans want to be able to drive to California tomorrow. They won’t.”

Mr. Kolodziej would say that. But he’s right. A switch to natural-gas cars would require a change of attitudes and expectations both by consumers and car makers. More of us would need to accept owning a car that can do one job – commuting and running errands in fewer than 200 miles a day. It’s the same fundamental proposition behind plug-in hybrids such as the Chevrolet Volt or plug-in Prius.

The big hurdle for natural-gas vehicles is that somebody will need to invest substantial sums in a consumer refueling infrastructure. The gas industry was hoping that somebody would be Uncle Sam. Unfortunately, Congress just found out last week it may have to spend $700 billion salvaging the global financial system. That could put big federal subsidies for natural-gas cars – and a lot of other worthy ideas – on the back burner.

___

Send comments about Eyes on the Road to joseph.white@wsj.com.

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press.

Posted At: Times Leader