Posts Tagged ‘HOUSTON’
Rendell backs halt to gas leasing of Pa. forests
MARC LEVY Associated Press Writer
HARRISBURG — Gov. Ed Rendell says the cash-strapped state government is leasing more public forest land to a company that wants to drill for natural gas in the vast Marcellus Shale reserve.
As a result, Rendell said Tuesday he will support legislation to temporarily halt additional leasing of state forest land for gas drilling.
Rendell says Houston-based Anadarko Petroleum Corp. has agreed to pay Pennsylvania $120 million for the right to drill on 33,000 acres in northcentral Pennsylvania.
The company owns the rights to surrounding tracts. The additional land is considered “disturbed” because it has been leased for shallow gas drilling in previous decades, although no drilling is actively occurring.
Still, a bill to halt new leasing of state forest land for drilling appears unlikely to pass the Senate.
Copyright: Times Leader
Cleaner shale technology is being sought
DAVID WETHE Bloomberg News
HOUSTON — Halliburton Co. and Schlumberger Ltd., trying to forestall a regulatory crackdown that would cut natural-gas drilling, are developing ways to eliminate the need for chemicals that may taint water supplies near wells.
New Marcellus deal announced
Norwegian oil giant Statoil has agreed to pay Chesapeake Energy Corp. an additional $253 million for about 59,000 acres of leasehold in the Marcellus Shale, the company announced Friday. The average cost is $4,325 per acre.
Statoil negotiated the right to periodically acquire a share of leasehold Chesapeake continues to amass in the Marcellus as part of the companies’ $3.4 billion deal in 2008.
“This type of transaction … further validates the developing high potential of the play,” Chesapeake spokesman Jim Gipson said.
At risk is hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, a process that unlocked gas deposits in shale formations and drove gains in U.S. production of the fuel. Proposed regulations might slow drilling and add $3 billion a year in costs, a government study found. As one solution, energy companies are researching ways to kill bacteria in fracturing fluids without using harmful biocides.
“The most dangerous part in the shale frack is the biocide,” said Steve Mueller, chief executive officer at Southwestern Energy Co., the biggest producer in the Fayetteville Shale of Arkansas. “That’s the number-one thing the industry is trying to find a way around.”
House and Senate bills introduced in 2009 would force producers to get permits for each well. That and other proposed environmental measures would cut drilling by as much as half and add compliance costs of $75 billion over 25 years, according to the U.S. Energy Department.
Biocides are employed because the watery fluids used to fracture rocks heat up when they’re pumped into the ground at high speed, causing bacteria and mold to multiply, Mueller said. The bacteria grow, inhibiting the flow of gas.
“You basically get a black slime in your lines,” he said. “It just becomes a black ooze of this bacteria that grew very quickly.”
Halliburton said March 9 that it’s testing a process using ultraviolet light to kill bacteria in fracking fluid.
About 80 percent of gas wells drilled in North America, including virtually all of those in the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania, are stimulated or fractured in some way, Tim Probert, corporate development chief at Halliburton, said.
“It’s incumbent on the industry to continue to develop tools and technologies that are compatible with minimizing the environmental impact of the stimulation process,” Probert said.
Copyright: Times Leader
Pa. officials fine Texas drilling firm
The Associated Press
DIMOCK — State regulators are fining a Houston-based company because its natural-gas drilling operations polluted residents’ water wells in northeastern Pennsylvania.
Department of Environmental Protection officials said Wednesday that Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. is paying $120,000 in connection with its finding that gas seeped underground into 13 water wells in Susquehanna County.
Cabot has drilled numerous gas wells into the Marcellus Shale rock formation in the rural county, about 15 miles south of the New York State border.
On Jan. 1, a water well exploded at a home nearby Cabot’s operations, prompting an investigation.
The department says its approval of Cabot’s well casing and cementing plans is now required before Cabot can drill.
It also says Cabot must develop a plan to permanently restore or replace the affected water supplies.
Copyright: Times Leader
Key Pa. gas drill case to be heard Analysis
Court will hear landowners’ claims that gas companies took advantage of them.
MARC LEVY Associated Press Writer
HARRISBURG — Pennsylvania landowners who want to snatch a better deal from natural gas companies hoping to drill into their ground and the potentially lucrative Marcellus Shale formation beneath it will get the ear of the state’s highest court.
Wednesday’s oral arguments in front of the state Supreme Court are certain to be watched closely for its impact on one of Pennsylvania’s biggest economic opportunities and environmental challenges in decades.
For exploration companies with offices from Calgary to Canonsburg, the decision could either bring a huge sigh of relief or the havoc of renegotiating land leases across the state, possibly throwing the entire gas industry into chaos.
The fact that the court moved quickly to hear the case — and resolve a burgeoning number of complaints in state and federal courts — demonstrates the seriousness of the matter.
“By its actions, I think the court recognizes that this really is an extraordinary issue for Pennsylvania and it’s critically important that it is resolved,” said David Fine, a Harrisburg-based lawyer representing ElexCo Land Services Inc. and Southwestern Energy Production Co.
To some extent, justices will hear plaintiffs’ attorneys tell a story of big corporations taking advantage of unsuspecting landowners, paying them a fraction of the upfront per-acre leasing fee that they later paid to other landowners as competition in the land rush intensified.
“They didn’t know Marcellus Shale from a hole in the wall and they feel the gas companies came in and got them to sell away the rights to their property,” said attorney Laurence M. Kelly, who is representing Susquehanna County landowner Herbert Kilmer and his family.
The real legal question will be whether some tens of thousands of leases were never valid because they violate a state law that guarantees landowners a minimum one-eighth royalty from the production of oil and gas on their land.
The lawsuits are just the latest sign that Pennsylvania’s laws governing mineral rights and environmental protection are lagging behind the large, modern-day industry presence that has descended here.
Dozens of exploration companies and contractors have flocked here since early 2008 from as far away as Houston, Denver, and Calgary, Alberta, in a rush to lock up land rights over the thickest portions of the shale. That rush has eased somewhat since the recession drove down natural gas prices — but the legal disputes have not.
By Fine’s estimate, more than 70 lawsuits have been filed in federal and state courts by plaintiffs seeking a judgment that the leases they signed were never valid.
In general, the leases in question give the exploration company the right to subtract certain costs — such as taxes, assessments or transportation — before paying the 12.5 percent royalty. That violates the law, plaintiffs say.
The law, however, is silent on the meaning of “royalty” and whether it is determined before or after those expenses.
Fine and industry officials say it is standard language in leases to deduct those costs — a contention disputed by landowner advocates in Pennsylvania and elsewhere.
But judicial decisions in two of the cases raised the prospect of a myriad of different legal opinions.
In Susquehanna County, the judge in the Kilmer vs. ElexCo case handed the companies an initial victory, saying the law does not specifically prohibit the subtraction of costs. Kilmer has appealed to state Superior Court.
Separately, a federal judge in Scranton hearing a case against Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. denied a motion to dismiss the case, saying the law’s silence does not necessarily mean the costs can be legally deducted.
Fine decided to ask the state Supreme Court to take up Kilmer vs. Elexco immediately, and effectively settle the matter for everyone.
Still, the high court’s decision could create a new kind of chaos. Records of oil and gas leases dating back to the royalty law of 1979 are kept in county courthouses, often in arcane filing systems, making it nearly impossible to know how many landowners and leases are potentially affected.
“I’m sure that no one person knows,” Kelly said.
Copyright: Times Leader
Area gas driller offering unusual lease
Some landowners holding back, banking on economic improvement to bring better offers from drillers.
By Rory Sweeneyrsweeney@timesleader.com
Staff Writer
The offer is somewhat unconventional, but a natural gas company that’s leasing land in Luzerne County says its deal is a successful compromise for both parties, and leaseholders agree.
Denver-based WhitMar has locked up more than 22,000 acres in, among other places, Fairmount, Ross, Lake, Lehman, Union, Hunlock, Huntington and Dallas townships, according to company representative Brad Shepard.
The company is offering an unusual deal that has garnered both accolades from landowners for navigating the money squeeze caused by the recession and criticism for its lack of a long-term commitment. WhitMar, which Shepard said is involved in similarly complicated and expensive drilling operations in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, Utah and the Dakotas, is offering a four-phase lease.
Landowners receive $12.50 per acre for the first year, after which the company decides whether it will continue the lease for a second year at the same payment rate. The lease also requires that within the first year the company begin the permit process for drilling at least one well and within the second year begin drilling at least one well.
For the third year, the company will offer a $2,500-per-acre, five-year lease on the properties it wants to keep, and landowners whose land gets drilled also will receive 19.5-percent royalties. Conservation Services, the company that amassed most of the territory, receives .5 percent of the royalties.
“As far as I know, that’s the highest royalty that’s been signed in Pennsylvania or New York,” Shepard said. “The reason we offered that royalty is literally because the landowners were willing to let us come in and test it up for $12.50” per acre.
The company then retains an option for a second five-year, $2,500-per-acre lease. “All together, it could be a 12-year lease,” Shepard said, but noted that the leases dissolve if the landowners aren’t paid. “So if they don’t receive a $2,500 payment or a $12.50 payment, the lease has expired because we didn’t pay them like we said we would.”
The offer has aroused reactions on both sides among affected landowners. Some urge restraint, predicting that better offers will crop up when the economy rebounds. “Right now, (gas companies) are picking all this low-hanging fruit,” said Ken Long, an executive committee member of the South West Ross Township Property Group that declined to recommend WhitMar’s offer to their group. “People are panicking to sign leases … because they want to get this monkey off their back.”
Landowners who signed leases note the generous royalties and the commitment to quickly begin exploration drilling. “I firmly believe that a sweeter, more lucrative deal can not be found in Luzerne County,” leaseholder Michael Giamber noted in an e-mail. “By comparison, the folks in Dimock (a truly proven area) can only get 18 percent. Over 30 years, a 2-percent difference in royalties can literally add millions of dollars in a landowner’s pocket.”
Shepard added that forced drilling likely means additional drilling will occur. “For the most part, once the drill rig’s brought in, it’s not brought in to drill one well,” he said. “As long as they hit, we have every intention of drilling as quickly as we can and our partner wants us.”
The company is still working out important specifics, though. First, it needs to find a larger partner to help drill, Shepard said, and it also must secure the rights to millions of gallons of water for the process that cracks the underground shale and releases gas.
In nearby counties, the company is working with Houston-based Carrizo Oil & Gas, Fort Worth-based XTO Energy, Inc., Louisiana-based Stone Energy Corp. and others, Shepard said.
He added that the company has received many offers from landowners to sell surface water on their properties, but said the company is not yet at the stage where it’s investigating water-acquisition options.
Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.
Copyright: Times Leader