Posts Tagged ‘John Baen’

He tells symposium Pa.’s “bureaucratic BS” is limiting operations.

PLAINS TWP. – To hear John Baen describe it, Pennsylvania is like an awkward, naive suitor, dithering over the details so much that it’s stumbling on the walk to the front door and turning off its hot date: natural gas drillers.

The industry has recently increased its complaints about what it sees as the state’s excessive regulatory procedures – or “bureaucratic BS,” as Baen put it on Wednesday – that are souring hopes to ramp up drilling in the potentially lucrative Marcellus Shale about a mile under much of northern and western Pennsylvania, among other states.

Keeping things green is important, the real-estate expert and University of North Texas professor said, but not as much as making some green. “I know you’re sensitive to your environment and all that, but it’s four acres (disturbed for drilling) out of 5,000” acres that are then producing gas, he said. “Would you allow a drilling rig in your back yard? … It depends on what they’re willing to pay you extra.”

Baen was one of three gas industry experts speaking at a Marcellus Shale Symposium hosted by the Joint Urban Studies Center at the Woodlands Inn & Resort. The center, a partnership of local colleges and universities, provides economic research for regional planning.

The experts were brought in to discuss their impressions from the proliferation of drilling in the Barnett Shale, a similar gas-filled rock formation in north Texas. Though concerns were addressed, such as potential environmental damage and likely workforce shortages, sanguine profiteering was emphasized repeatedly.

William Brackett, the managing editor of an influential Barnett Shale newsletter, noted the local job market and economy ballooned 50 percent in 2007 to 83,823 jobs and an $8.2-billion economic benefit. The same good fortune is befalling rural Pennsylvania farmers who were near destitute, he said. “All the sudden, they get a new barn and are able to send their kids to college.”

Of all the speakers, the most subdued in his support of the industry was Matt Sheppard, a director of corporate development for Oklahoma-based Chesapeake Energy, which sponsored the symposium. Though natural gas drilling has been in the state for decades, it has lain pretty low, he said. “This is not an industry that has done a great job of talking about things, explaining things,” he said. “We’re here for one reason, and that is that Americans are demanding cleaner energy right now. … And the truth is we’re not going to the other way.”

The presenters said the industry is looking for straightforward rules like in other states, which have standardized drilling manuals and few other regulatory hoops. But despite Baen’s dire predictions that drillers might pull up stakes, Sheppard assured his company was likely sticking it out.

“At Chesapeake, we’re big believers in organized development,” he said. “You’re not going to see a lot of companies come in here and drill one well and leave. … You invest this amount of money in a state, you’re going to be around a while.”

Copyright: Times Leader

Senate hearing set for today at Misericordia, symposium Wednesday at Woodlands.

While landowners are imagining the gobs of cash they stand to make from natural-gas drilling in the Marcellus Shale rock layer underlying much of the region, Don Young hopes there’s room to imagine a few other images, such as gas pipelines crisscrossing once-pristine farmland, benzene contaminating groundwater supplies and an industrywide press to tap every inch of lucrative ground.

And that doesn’t include the Fort Worth, Texas, resident’s concerns about the psychological effects of celebrity-fronted publicity campaigns linking the drilling to patriotism and national security. “It’s Orwellian to see it happening here,” he said. “You’ve got American flags on each well.”

But the leader of Fort Worth Citizens Against Neighborhood Drilling Ordinance hopes the travails that now plague his home above the Barnett Shale are averted in the similar Marcellus Shale. “What you have here in Fort Worth on a grand scale is apathy. People felt, ‘We can’t stop it. It’s too big. It’s big oil,’ ” he explained. “The average busy person, they don’t have time to worry about gas drilling. … They have families, they have lives, they’re struggling, and if you have a few companies handing out money saying, ‘Here’s some money, just forget about it,’ ” they’ll do just that, he said.

Local regulators and educators are already taking steps to avoid those effects, and they’ll take a few more this week. This afternoon, the state Senate Republican’s Policy Committee will meet at Misericordia University to hear testimony from people familiar with dealings in the Barnett Shale on the potential effects awaiting Pennsylvania.

Several of the same speakers will be featured in discussions Wednesday morning at the Woodlands Inn & Resort in Plains Township, as the Joint Urban Studies Center holds a Marcellus Shale Symposium. The public is invited to either presentation, but the symposium has a registration fee.

“We are front and center to the development of this new industry,” said state Sen. Lisa Baker, R-Lehman Township, who requested the hearing. “I think having the hearing here demonstrates, in my judgment, that we’re doing all we can to ensure that our laws and regulations are appropriate and that if we need to make changes,” the legislature is ready to do so.

She said she hopes to get answers to questions she often hears from constituents, including potential downsides to drilling and whether current regulations are enough to curtail them.

According to several of the speakers, Pennsylvania might have a lot of ground to make up before it’s running even with the industry. “I just don’t understand the state’s set-up. Why wouldn’t that be a requirement to disclose how well the wells (are performing)?” asked John Baen, a University of North Texas professor and real-estate expert who has 250 wells on his property in the Barnett Shale. “If it’s all proprietary, then how do we know what the true wealth is?”

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader

Texans to share their experiences

HUGHESVILLE – As night falls over Beaver Lake Road, work lights gradually accentuate a towering structure visible between the rolling hills. In the middle of a roughly square-acre site, the drilling rig is about halfway through a four-week stay at this rural Lycoming County site.

Soon thereafter, the rig will leave, crews will arrive to tap the natural-gas well, gas will begin being pumped into regional transmission pipelines and Chief Oil & Gas LLC of Dallas, Texas, will begin reaping income.

So will Neil and Louise Barto, though hardly what they say they deserve. They signed over the mineral rights to their nearly 178 acres three years ago for $888.45 and the state-minimum 12.5-percent royalties on the production.

“Everybody made money except us,” Neil Barto said. “Hell yes, it irritates me. … Every time I see somebody from Chief, I tell them I’m not happy about it.”

That’s the sort of cautionary tale the Joint Urban Studies Center is hoping to keep to a minimum in the area by hosting the Marcellus Shale Symposium on Nov. 19 at the Woodlands Inn & Resort in Plains Township. Cost is $30. The symposium will feature experts from the Fort Worth area, which witnessed during the past two decades a historical revolution as the oil and gas industry figured out how to tap gas stores under urban centers.

“The energy companies are used to operating out in rural areas where there’s nothing to bother but some cows and horses and whatnot,” said Will Brackett, the managing editor of the weekly Powell Barnett Shale Newsletter. With people came environmental concerns, landowners organizing to leverage better offers and opposition from those left out of the Barnett Shale windfall.

John Baen, a real estate professor at the University of North Texas, said he’s in a unique position to comment on the Marcellus because he used to fish in the Susquehanna River growing up as a boy, but also watched 9,000 wells be drilled in five Texas counties within seven years. “We had a lot of people who said, ‘Not in my back yard,’ then we had a lot of people who said, ‘Well maybe,’ and people who said, ‘Drill every square foot,’” he said.

Brackett noted that people who hadn’t finished high school were landing $50,000-per-year jobs, making it difficult for other industries to keep workers. As the companies struck more and more hydrocarbon gold, they offered leases to ever more landowners, who began organizing and using the Internet to publicize offers. Bidding wars erupted, with offers at $25,000 per acre and 25-percent royalties on production. “It got to be, I’d have to say, surreal around here,” he said. “Last year, if you went to a party, everyone was talking about the Barnett Shale.”

One of the most important steps to expanding exploitation of the shale is placating objectors, Baen said.

“I have a theory that everyone should be a stakeholder, and everybody should win,” he said. “It might take some pretty big changes in some of your laws up there to have everybody benefit.”

He noted that Texas has no state income tax, but that every mineral-rights owner pays a severance tax that has left the state with an $11-billion overabundance.

Both Brackett and Baen agree Pennsylvania and its citizens stand to benefit extensively from the advances made in Fort Worth in recent years, but only if the state refocuses its mineral-rights policies from coal to gas and oil.

“I’m calling it the Jewel of the Northeast,” Baen said, but “will it be allowed to be developed? And it may not.”

If the state legislature doesn’t act quickly, he predicted the economic benefit could be delayed up to five years.

Copyright: Times Leader