Posts Tagged ‘natural gas field’

Barnstorming Pa., MSC Continues to Educate, Engage “Friends of Marcellus”

The positive and overwhelming benefits associated with the responsible development of the Marcellus Shale’s abundant, homegrown, clean-burning natural gas know no county lines or state borders. Considered to be the world’s second largest natural gas field – second only to one in Iran – the Marcellus Shale’s potential to generate jobs, revenue and opportunity for all Pennsylvanians is real. And it’s a story worth taking on the road.

And so this week, that’s what the Marcellus Shale Coalition and its growing grassroots network did – traveling the length and width of the Commonwealth to continue to educate and engage the 12 million folks that proudly call Pennsylvania home. Along the way, we also took some time to  highlight the economic, supply-chain and job growth opportunities that continue to be created for the local workforce — efforts that will continue at an aggressive pace as the responsible exploration of clean-burning natural gas in Pennsylvania continues to expand.

Here’s a quick snapshot of the ground that the MSC has covered in just the past couple days, along with a run-down of where we’re headed next:

We Started in Philadelphia

The MSC joined the Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development (DCED) to educate local businesses last week of the enormous opportunities that exist up and down the Marcellus Shale supply chain. MSC president Kathryn Klaber also met with elected leaders in Philadelphia to discuss the merits of natural gas-powered vehicles, and other benefits that the Mighty Marcellus will continue to deliver to the city’s residents.

Click here to view the embedded video.

• “There’s a lot of safeguards in place…that make sure Pennsylvanians have safe drinking water,” said Marcellus Shale Coalition president Kathryn Klaber. Klaber is also here to talk about the economic benefits of expanding drilling, mainly the estimated 200,000 jobs that would be created in Pennsylvania. (ABC6 TV, 8/13/10)

Then We Headed Back to Pittsburgh

At the Pittsburgh Business Times’ Energy Inc. conference yesterday afternoon, Gov. Tom Ridge – as reported by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette – highlighted the benefits of responsible Marcellus development, as well as the safeguards in place and the commitment from the industry to protect the environment.

Click here to view the embedded video.

• Gov. Tom Ridge

o    “I think this is a potentially a transformational opportunity for our state. At the same time, we have to – we must – do it in a way consistent with our commitment to retain the beauty and the bounty, and the pristine condition of Pennsylvania.”

o    “I was on site today that 80 or 90 folks working that at the that site, and about 80 percent of them were local residents from Pennsylvania. Of course, the economic sustainability is real. They call it the ‘Marcellus Multiplier.’

o    “At the end of the day, facts are stubborn things. And we just have to get some facts out there so people can better understand what the industry can do – and will do – to build a sustainable economic model and be true to our commitment to the environment.”

And Now We’re Headed to State College – And Beyond

In an effort to further underscore the benefits responsible that Marcellus Shale development is generating for family farmers and Pennsylvania’s agriculture economy, the MSC will attend Penn State University’s Ag Progress Days today. And tomorrow, MSC president Kathryn Klaber will discuss ways that local business can join the growing Marcellus supply chain network with the Small Business Development Centers (SBDC) at Lock Haven University; she will also participate in a shale gas forum at Marywood University, alongside U.S. Sen. Bob Casey.

Interested in learning more, and joining our fight for a stronger economy and a cleaner and more secure energy future? Become a “Friend of Marcellus” today.

Mauri Rapp Abington Journal Correspondent

Sir Francis Bacon once said “Knowledge is power.” To that famous quote, Calvin Tillman adds “Once you know, you can’t not know.”

Tillman, the mayor of DISH, Texas, was one of four panelists in attendance at “Impacts of Gas Drilling and Your Community,” a Marcellus Shale drilling information seminar held April 29 at the Clark Summit fire hall. DISH, a town of fewer than 200 residents located approximately 25 miles from the Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex, garnered national attention after changing its name from Clark in exchange for free cable television service for ten years from DISH Network.

DISH has also attracted another kind of attention: the eye of natural gas companies drilling in the Barnett Shale region, a natural gas field which stretches approximately 5,000 square miles across the state of Texas. Tillman called DISH the “Grand Central Station” of the Barnett Shale play, with 11 compressor stations, three metering stations and more than 20 natural gas pipelines located within less than two square miles.

Tillman described to the 150-plus people in attendance April 29 the impact natural gas drilling has had on his town. To date, the Barnett Shale play has added approximately $8 to $10 billion and 100,000 jobs to the Texas economy, Tillman said. The industry has also added toxic chemicals to DISH’s air, he said. A study performed in August 2009 by Wolf Eagle Environmental showed that the air contained high concentrations of carcinogens and neurotoxins. Tillman continues to advocate for the town’s population, and on April 22 the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality installed a continuous air monitor in DISH. “I believe more testing should be done,” he said.

The mayor has relayed his story to audiences in the Marcellus Shale region during the past several months. Tillman said he is not against the industry and believes in working with it to get things done, but feels that citizens and communities should go into leases with their eyes open. He said that certain measures, such as green technologies, declaration of areas such as schools and parks off limits to drilling, and a separation between the DEP regulating and permitting bodies could help make the industry safer. Tillman also spoke in favor of a severance tax for Pennsylvania. “I hate to break it to you, but the oil and gas industry came into Pennsylvania and picked your pockets,” Tillman said. “You need to have a severance tax to pay for roads, to pay for environmental issues, to pay for more DEP workers.”

Putting a personal face on the Marcellus Shale play was Victoria Switzer, a natural gas lessor from Dimock Township who said she wished she knew when she signed her lease what she knows now. “We’ve all heard the glories of the natural gas industry,” Switzer said. “I’m not going to dispute some of those things, but I’m going to show you what comes with the package deal.”

Switzer said that for the past couple of years, she has been living in a gas field with 63 wells located within nine square miles, the closest one 710 feet from her own home. Twenty-four of those wells have had violations, said Switzer. She now conducts what she calls “Victoria’s Toxic Tours” for citizens, journalists and public officials interested in seeing the impact natural gas drilling has had in her township. “You need to know what is coming your way,” she told the audience.

Panelist Paul Lumia, executive director of North Branch Land Trust, provided tips for those who decide to lease to natural gas drillers, including getting to know one’s gas man and remaining vigilant in reporting suspected violations to DEP. Lumia also encourages the crowd to pressure policymakers into decisions that preserve the environment. “Don’t just assume that your neighbors will do it,” Lumia said. “Protecting our land is up to us.”

Also on hand was George E. Turner, a professional geologist with more than 20 years of experience with groundwater and water testing. Turner advised those considering natural gas leasing to get their water tested beforehand. “This gives you legal proof in case your water is contaminated,” he said.

Scott Perry, deputy director of the DEP Bureau of Oil and Gas Management, was on hand to answer questions from the audience.

Copyright: Times Leader

By Steve Mocarskysmocarsky@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

WILKES-BARRE – A representative of a trade association for the oil and natural gas industry defended her members’ record on environmental issues Tuesday during a meeting with The Times Leader editorial board.

Sara Banaszak, senior economist with the American Petroleum Institute in Washington, D.C., also shared her perspectives on federal regulation and state taxation of the industry.

Banaszak indicated she understands concerns that residents of the region might have, given the legacy of coal barons profiting from the region’s anthracite, disappearing with their profits, and leaving future generations to deal with stripping pits, mine subsidence, acidic streams and lung disease.

“From the industry perspective, no accident and no amount of pollution is acceptable. It’s not sustainable for the industry. If I’m polluting your water, I know I’m going to be tossed out of town in two minutes, so it’s not in my interest,” Banaszak said.

Banaszak said any industrial process can be dangerous, “and anything we do has impacts on the earth. So what we’re trying to do is continuously and on an ongoing basis employ best knowledge, best practices and the technological development and the regulation needed to make sure that we’re getting the best that we can. And the best that we can has to be clean water. We have to have clean water,” she said.

Banaszak said many people don’t realize there is already regulation in place to protect Pennsylvania from water pollution.

“Even if I get a lease, I’m not going to drill a well or even move equipment onto that site until I’ve presented to the state of Pennsylvania a well drilling plan, and a well drilling plan has a water management plan attached to it,” she said.

Much concern has been raised about “fracking” – the hydraulic fracturing of rock to release natural gas.

Banaszak said fracking has been used in the industry since the 1940s. And when the Safe Drinking Water Act was passed in 1974, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency found it unnecessary to regulate because it wasn’t threatening drinking water. The manner in which it was being managed at the state level was sufficient to protect drinking water, she said.

Banaszak said problems with the completion of drilling and cementing of wells or poor management of fracking fluid on the surface led to pollution of groundwater, not the fracking process itself. She said more oversight is needed for those practices.

Banaszak said gas companies don’t want to reveal formulas for fracking fluids because they are proprietary. But the industry doesn’t oppose disclosing the proprietary information to state regulators, local authorities and hospitals if the information is kept confidential, she said.

Banaszak said making the EPA responsible for oversight of fracking would require the agency to develop a new oversight program or dramatically overhaul its program regulating underground use of fluids.

A complete overhaul would be a slow process, taking six months to two years to develop a proposal, plus more time for advertising, public comment and developing draft and final plans.

“That’s why there’s so much concern. It’s not a simple matter just to say, oh, we’re just asking under federal law for the disclosure of chemicals,” she said.

Regarding concerns about fracking depleting water supplies, Banaszak said that even at double the peak drilling level in the Barnett Shale in Texas, which is 10 times greater than Marcellus drilling was in 2009, water use would represent only half of what is used for recreational purposes in Pennsylvania, such as golf course and ski slope maintenance.

As for economics, Banaszak said imposing a severance tax on natural gas production could actually hamper economic development.

Although the Marcellus Shale is the second-largest natural gas field in the world, she said other sources are available to investors. She said it seems natural to assume that the state could gain more revenue through taxing natural gas production, but the issue can be counter-intuitive.

“If you impose a tax, you get less investment and the government could see less net revenues. … If you let the situation go, the amount of government revenue you collect could actually be more,” she said.

The pipeline infrastructure in the Northeast is old and difficult to tap, requiring much investment. In West Virginia, where taxes there are 10 percent higher, “you see dramatically low investment,” Banaszak said.

Copyright: Times Leader