Posts Tagged ‘natural gas’
Study boosts Shale’s fiscal pluses for Pa.
PSU report touts job growth, increased taxes; planned severance tax a concern. Others say study inflates benefits.
STEVE MOCARSKY smocarsky@timesleader.com
Development of the Marcellus Shale has the potential to create more than 200,000 jobs in Pennsylvania during the next 10 years, according to an update to a Penn State University study released on Monday.
The report warned, however, that imposing a state severance tax on the natural gas industry, as Gov. Ed Rendell has proposed, could induce energy companies to redirect their investments to other shale “plays” in the United States. Plays refers to natural gas development in other shale developments.
If that happened, any revenues gained from a severance tax could be offset by losses in sales taxes and income taxes resulting from lower drilling activity and natural gas production as producers shift their capital spending to other shale plays.
Some, however, have expressed doubt about the impact of a severance tax and claims and assumptions about economic benefits and job growth in the report.
The update, commissioned by the Marcellus Shale Coalition, was conducted by professors with the university’s Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering. It supplements a study the department released last July.
The updated study also states that during just the next 18 months, gas drilling activities are expected to create more than $1.8 billion in state and local tax revenues.
“At a time when more than half-a-million people in Pennsylvania are currently out of work, the release of this updated report from Penn State … confirms the critical role that responsible energy development in the commonwealth can play in substantially, perhaps even permanently, reversing that trend,” Kathryn Klaber, president and executive director of the Marcellus Shale Coalition, said in a press release.
“Last year alone, Marcellus producers paid more than $1.7 billion to landowners across the state, and spent more than $4.5 billion total to make these resources available. By the end of this year, that number is expected to double, and millions of Pennsylvanians will find themselves the direct beneficiaries of that growth,” Klaber said.
The updated study finds that Marcellus development will create more than 111,000 new jobs by 2011, a result of an increase in the number of wells developed from the roughly 1,400 in operation today to 2,200 expected during the next 18 months.
All told, by 2011, this work is expected to deliver nearly $1 billion in annual tax revenue to state and local governments.
In addition to generating tax revenue, natural gas development stimulates the economy in two major ways: business-to-business spending and payments to land owners, the study states.
Exploring, drilling, processing and transporting natural gas requires goods and services from many sectors of the economy, such as construction, trucking, steelmaking and engineering services. Gas companies also pay lease and royalty payments to land owners, who also spend and pay taxes on this income.
In 2009, Marcellus gas producers spent a total of $4.5 billion to develop Marcellus Shale gas resources, drilling 710 wells that year. The writers estimate that this spending added $3.9 billion in value to the economy and generated $389 million in state and local tax revenues, and more than 44,000 jobs.
Based on energy company plans to drill 1,743 wells this year, value-added dollars, tax revenue and jobs creation are expected to approximately double for 2010, according to the report. And by 2015, the numbers are expected to nearly double from this year.
Some question PSU report
While the report paints a rosy economic picture for the state, assuming that no severance tax is imposed, some are leery of assumptions and claims made in the report.
Dick Martin, coordinator of the Pennsylvania Forest Coalition, an alliance of outdoor enthusiasts, landowners, churches and conservation groups, first notes a disclaimer in the study, that Penn State does not guarantee the accuracy or usefulness of the information.
Martin said the study contains some flaws.
While the study states that development costs are higher in the Marcellus Shale than in other shale plays, “the industry itself tells its shareholders that the Marcellus is a low-cost gas deposit,” he said.
“Chesapeake Energy has told its shareholders that it can make a 10 percent return when gas prices are at only $2.59 per thousand cubic feet. Gas price today is $4.08,” Martin said.
Martin also said the study relies on data and assumptions supplied by the gas industry and that it looks only at benefits and not at costs to communities, infrastructure, environment and regulators.
He said the study does not look at data from other states that either imposed or raised severance taxes. He said there is no evidence that severance taxes affect either production or investment in states that impose or raise severance taxes.
Martin pointed to a review by the state Budget and Policy Center of the study Penn State released in July, saying the review is still valid because the update is based on the 2009 report and used the same methodology.
The review claims that the 2009 Penn State report “overplays the positive impacts of increased natural gas production, while minimizing the negative.”
Among other flaws, the report “exaggerates the impact a severance tax would have on development of the Marcellus Shale and overstates what taxes the industry now pays, going so far as to count fishing and hunting license fees paid by those who benefit from the industry as a tax due to industry activity,” the review states.
Also according to the review, the report acknowledges that many drillers will avoid corporate taxes, paying the much lower personal income tax or avoiding taxes altogether through deductions.
The report also “inflates the economic impact of expanded gas production in Pennsylvania to puff up the industry’s economic promise,” the review states.
Steve Mocarsky, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7311.
Copyright: Times Leader
Shale coalition president promotes drilling’s economic benefits
Orginally published on May 21, 2010
By: STEVE MOCARSKY
SCRANTON – The president of the Marcellus Shale Coalition on Monday told regional community leaders that development of the Marcellus Shale not only will help the economy on a large scale, but it’s just as important to recognize the effects on the area business owners and the area job market.
Kathryn Klaber, who was hired four months ago as the first president of the fledgling coalition, said it was formed in 2008 to advance responsible development of natural gas from the geological formation that lies more than a mile below a good portion of the state.
She was a guest speaker at the annual Lackawanna-Luzerne County Indicators Report presented by the Institute for Public Policy & Economic Development at the Radisson Lackawanna Station hotel.
The report looks at many factors in the area, including jobs, economics, housing and education. All of those are being influenced by development of the Marcellus Shale, Klaber said.
Klaber said macroeconomics are important, “and every shale play has them. But we also realize we have to make this more understandable, that these are real jobs with real companies in Pennsylvania,” she said.
“Around a well site, you’ve got basically a $4 million construction project for each well. And with that comes all sorts of stuff that we make here in Pennsylvania. This is a chance to kind of rebuild that making-and-doing economy,” Klaber said.
Klaber went through each step of well development and explained the types of companies are involved, the kinds and quantities of materials used, and the opportunities that already are being realized by local and Pennsylvania companies.
With new well cementing regulations being proposed by the state Department of Environmental protection, “there is more cement manufacturing that we could be doing here. Rail has been seeing record months of cargo with their hauling related to the Marcellus, she said.
“When we think of it, we just think, oh, the handful of people running that one piece of equipment to drill the well,” Klaber said.
“Oh my gosh, no. In site operation, who’s going to bring backhoes and graders from out-of-state? No, it’s the companies that own the backhoes and graders that is going to be hired to do the site preparation work. Compressors, we’ve got a lot of companies that build components for compressor stations here,” she said.
“Chief Oil & Gas had a 4,000-ton order they just placed with U.S. Steel in the Mon Valley (near Pittsburgh). It’s 50 miles of pipe and that’s only a fraction of what you need in the course of a year,” Klaber said.
Klaber said the coalition is 92 members strong and “growing by the dozens every month.”
Contact the author: smocarsky@timesleader.com
Copyright: The Times Leader
State has no active drill leases here
The Times Leader staff
There are approximately 49,000 acres of State Game Lands throughout Luzerne County and portions of that are near areas being eyed by natural gas companies.
Pennsylvania Game Commission spokesman Jerry Feaser said the agency doesn’t have any active leases for gas drilling at this time in Luzerne County, but in other areas where drilling has occurred on game lands, use by hunters is restricted to a degree.
According to Feaser, the drill sites aren’t classified as safety zones but the access to active sites is restricted. Boundaries are determined by the Game Commission and the gas companies. Once the drilling process is complete, Feaser said, the area is available for hunting and trapping.
On Game Lands where the PGC owns the gas rights and enters into a lease, Feaser said, they typically reach agreements with companies to avoid activity during peak hunting seasons. Also, the agency can prioritize setbacks or limit where drilling can occur near environmentally sensitive areas and other habitats on game lands where it owns the rights.
“Our focus is protecting wildlife habitats, and if there is a possible threat to sensitive areas, we don’t allow drilling,” Feaser said. “However, the complication is when we don’t own the rights to the gas resource, we then lose the ability to control the project.”
Copyright: Times Leader
Area races seeing little gas money
That situation could shift, says co-author of study of political donations.
By Andrew M. Sederaseder@timesleader.com
Times Leader Staff Writer
While natural gas companies and their related political action committees have given millions of dollars to elected officials throughout Pennsylvania since 2001, the donations have not flowed as heavily into the coffers of politicians serving Luzerne County.
One of the authors of a report that looked at the correlation of campaign contributions and legislation related to the natural gas drilling industry predicted they soon will.
A study released this week by the non-profit organization Pennsylvania Common Cause, takes a look at the link between gas firms and political donations and finds that since 2001, the industry has contributed $2.8 million to political candidates in Pennsylvania.
The study, titled “Deep Drilling, Deep Pockets” also reports that since 2007 the industry has spent $4.2 million to lobby members of the state legislature and the Rendell administration.
“I think part of the industry’s success is cultivating people at the very top,” said James Browning, director of development for Pennsylvania Common Cause and one of two men who put the report together.
The report includes a list of the top 25 recipients of the funding from Jan. 1, 2001 through April of 2010. At the top of the list is state Attorney General Tom Corbett, a Republican candidate for governor. He received $361,207, according to the report. Two previous gubernatorial candidates also made the list – Mike Fisher, who lost his bid in 2002, accepted $98,386, and Lynn Swan, who lost his bid in 2006, took in $351,263. Both men are Republicans.
Gov. Ed Rendell is sixth on the list. The Democrat from Philadelphia has accepted $84,100 in campaign contributions over the past nine and a third years. Current Democratic candidates for governor Dan Onorato, $59,300 and Jack Wagner, $44,550, ranked seventh and 10th respectively.
Others on the list include current and former judges, a former lieutenant governor, a candidate this year for that same post, a former candidate for the state House and numerous current members of the General Assembly.
Not one of the seven state House members or four state senators who represent Luzerne County made the top 25 list. In fact, according to records on the Department of State website and those provided by Pennsylvania Common Cause, campaigns for four of the seven House members did not receive one dime from the gas companies. The four are: Jim Wansacz, D-Old Forge; Phyllis Mundy, D-Kingston; Eddie Day Pashinski, D-Wilkes-Barre; and Mike Carroll, D-Avoca.
Rep. Karen Boback, R-Harveys Lake, accepted $250 from Chesapeake Energy Corp. Fed PAC on Oct. 9, 2009. Boback said that money was accepted by mistake and returned two months later. She said it is her policy “not to solicit or accept contributions from oil or gas companies.”
Rep. John Yudichak, D-Plymouth Twp., accepted $250 on April 10, 2008, from the PAC affiliated with Dominion Energy. Rep. Todd A. Eachus, D-Butler Township, accepted $500 from EQT Corp. PAC on July 2, 2009; $500 from EXCO Resources PAC on Oct. 20, 2008; and $250 from Equitable Resources, Inc. PAC on Sept. 30, 2008.
Of the four senators who represent a portion of Luzerne County, Bob Mellow, D-Peckville, took in the most at $3,000. That encompasses eight total donations, four from the Equitable Resources, Inc. Political Involvement Committee totaling $1,750 and four from the NFG PA PAC, affiliated with Seneca Resources, totaling $1,250. He declined comment through a spokeswoman, saying that he had not yet seen the report.
Sen. John Gordner, R-Berwick, accepted three donations of $500 from Dominion PAC. One came in 2004, another in 2006 and the third in 2008. His term does not expire for another two years.
Sen. Ray Musto, D-Pittston Township, accepted $500 from the Marathon Oil Co. Employees PAC on Oct. 20, 2008. Earlier this year, the veteran lawmaker announced he was retiring and not seeking another term in Harrisburg.
Sen. Lisa Baker, R-Lehman Township, accepted three donations at $500 apiece. One came from Cabot Oil and Gas on April 22, 2009; another was from EXCO Resources PAC on Nov. 19, 2008; and on April, 22, 2009, she accepted one from NFG PA PAC.
Browning said that as pressure from the public is placed on officials to tax the industry and approve more regulations, the elected officials at all levels of government, even those in non-leadership positions, will begin to see the money.
“I will predict that as there are more votes and as drilling expands, the money will come,” Browning said.
It will not head to Baker anymore.
The senator, who is seeking her second term in office this year, said, “Because of the sensitivity of the issues revolving around gas drilling, I am not asking for contributions from the gas drilling interests, nor am I accepting them.”
Barry Kauffman, executive director for Pennsylvania Common Cause, said the report illustrates the “power of political money in the governing process.” He said that as discussions about securing access to state forest land for drilling and severance taxes on natural gas production have popped up the past two years, lobbyist and campaign contribution spending have increased. The results have been no taxes have been approved and the state leased state land for drillers.
Baker said that she votes in response to her constituents, not her contributors.
“My legislative decision-making takes into account a variety of factors, but campaign contributions are never one of them. If anyone who contributes believes they are gaining special access or assuring a result, they will be sorely disappointed. That no-connection principle applies irrespective of the size of the contribution,” Baker said.
Andrew M. Seder, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 570-829-7269.
Coyright: Times Leader
State tells drillers to follow the rules
State DEP chief talks about protecting water supplies in the Marcellus Shale areas.
By Steve Mocarskysmocarsky@timesleader.com
Staff Writer
HARRISBURG – State Department of Environmental Protection Secretary John Hanger laid down the law to representatives of oil and gas companies drilling in the Marcellus Shale at a meeting he called on Thursday.
IF YOU GO
New proposed environmental regulations affecting the natural gas industry will be presented to the state Environmental Quality Board at the next meeting, which is at 9 a.m. Monday in Room 105 of the Rachel Carson Office Building, 400 Market St., Harrisburg.
More precisely, he laid out two sets of proposed regulations for natural gas drilling procedures and responding to reports of contamination of water supplies – proposed regulations that members of the oil and gas industry helped create.
“There were technical discussions on how to prevent gas migration from (natural gas) well sites to water wells and what to do if migration does occur and how to respond,” Hanger said in an interview from his cell phone as he was riding to Dimock after the meeting in Harrisburg.
Hanger was on his way to an interview with ABC News at the site of a natural gas well that Cabot Oil & Gas capped under DEP order after the regulatory agency determined it was one of three that leaked methane, contaminating the well water supplies of at least 14 households in the rural Susquehanna County village.
“I challenged the industry. … I made it clear that regulations would be enforced,” Hanger said, noting that DEP opened two new field offices in Northeastern Pennsylvania in response to Marcellus Shale development and is doubling its enforcement staff. “I also made it clear we were strengthening the rules,” he said.
DEP spokesman Tom Rathbun said in a separate interview that the new drilling regulations would require specific testing according to standards of the American National Standards Institute on steel casing used in all high-pressure oil and gas wells as well as the use of “oil-field grade” cement in well construction.
Rathbun said the oil and gas industry supports the implementation of those standards, and most companies already employ those practices under best-management practices. The goal is to have all companies comply, and Hanger asked the industry to voluntarily comply immediately, rather than wait until regulations receive all necessary approvals, which are expected in November.
Rathbun said the new regulations are “designed to prevent situations like the one in Dimock.” He said the issue there was incomplete casing – Cabot Oil & Gas didn’t use enough cement in the well construction.
DEP in April banned Cabot from drilling in Pennsylvania until it plugs the three wells determined to be leaking gas. Cabot has already paid a $240,000 fine and must pay $30,000 per month until the company meets its obligations.
Rathbun said one well is capped, and Cabot is currently working to cap a second.
He said most of the discussion at the meeting focused on responding to reports of gas migration into water sources.
Currently, the industry is required to report any suspected or confirmed occurrence of gas migration to DEP. The new regulations would require immediately reporting suspected or confirmed migration to DEP and to emergency responders for the affected municipality.
As chairman of the state Environmental Quality Board, Hanger on Monday will present those proposed regulations to the board for adoption. If approved, they will be sent to the House and the Senate Environmental Resources & Energy Committee.
Each legislative committee will have 30 days to review the proposed regulations before either recommending a vote or sending them to the Independent Regulatory Review Commission, which is composed of administrative law judges. A final approval is required from the state attorney general to ensure they are constitutional.
The whole process can take about six months.
Kathryn Klaber, president and executive director of the Marcellus Shale Coalition, which represents the natural gas production industry, said in a written statement that the coalition is “fully committed” to continue working with government regulators to ensure that the potential of the Marcellus Shale in the state is realized in a safe and responsible way.
“Today’s meeting with DEP represents yet another honest and straightforward discussion about the best practices needed to fully achieve this vision. Positive progress on practices relating to the management of historic and naturally occurring shallow gas, as well as other initiatives related to transparency and well integrity, will help our industry continue to strengthen its safety and environmental record while continuing to create tens of thousands of jobs each year for residents of this state,” Klaber said.
Steve Mocarsky, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7311.
Copyright: Times Leader
State tells how to protect water quality
A Back Mountain workshop addresses potential problems with Marcellus Shale drilling.
By Steve Mocarskysmocarsky@timesleader.com
Staff Writer
LEHMAN TWP. – Back Mountain residents who attended a workshop on “Natural Gas Drilling and Drinking Water” on Thursday received a mini education on how to protect their wells from potential contamination by migrating natural gas as well as what two regulator agencies are doing to protect state waterways from the same potential threat.
Contact the state Department of Environmental Protection at the following numbers with questions about water quality related to Marcellus Shale natural gas drilling and concerns about suspected contamination:
826-2300 – 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. weekdays
826-2511 – after-hours emergency and complaint number
321-6550 – Bureau of Oil & Gas East Regional Main Office
Call Bryan Swistock of the Penn State Cooperative Extension with questions about protecting water wells at 814-863-0194.
Bryan Swistock, a water resources extension associate from the Penn State Cooperative Extension, presented an hour-long talk about natural gas exploration in the Marcellus Shale formation, how problems with drilling operations could potentially affect drinking water supplies, and what residents can and should do to protect them.
The program was hosted by the Cooperative Extension, state Sen. Lisa Baker, state Rep. Karen Boback, Back Mountain Community Partnership, the Susquehanna River Basin Commission and the state Department of Environmental Protection.
Swistock said about 41 percent of all private drinking water wells fail at least one water quality test, so it’s smart to test one’s well water regularly even without the threat of natural gas from drilling wells migrating into them.
Swistock said energy companies are required to test all water supplies within 1,000 feet of a drilling site before drilling so they have a baseline to compare test results if there is suspected contamination of a water supply by drilling activity. Some companies, such as EnCana Oil and Gas, which is poised to begin drilling in the Back Mountain in July, test wells within 1 mile of a drill site.
Swistock said residents should make sure the person collecting water samples works for a state-accredited lab. He said he’s talked to several people who told them the person who took samples was the same person who negotiated a land lease with them.
For folks who live outside the area in which the energy company pays for testing but want to play it safe, he said a full round of tests can cost up to $1,000. However, testing for the most common elements associated with Marcellus Shale drilling – methane, chloride, barium and total dissolved solids (TDS) – costs only about $150.
Indicators of water problems include foaming or bubbling water or spurting faucets, salty or metallic tastes, changes in water color or odor and reductions in water quantity or flow.
Also making presentations on Thursday were Michael McDonnell, a water quality specialist with DEP, and Tom Beauduy, deputy director and counsel for the Susquehanna River Basin Commission.
Copyright: Times Leader
Gas exploration of state forest land has some concerned
Governor’s office announced this week a plan to allow Anadarko Petroleum to access 32,896 acres.
By Steve Mocarskysmocarsky@timesleader.com
Staff Writer
Some state representatives are concerned about Gov. Ed Rendell’s decision to lease nearly 33,000 acres of state forest land to an energy company for natural gas exploration.
Rendell’s office on Tuesday announced that Anadarko Petroleum Corp. has paid the commonwealth $120 million to access 32,896 acres of state forest through a natural gas lease agreement with the state Department of Conservation and Natural Resources.
Prior to a presentation on the state Department of Environmental Protection’s role in regulating natural gas drilling that she attended Tuesday at Misericordia University, state Rep. Phyllis Mundy said she was disappointed to learn of the lease transaction.
“The areas that could responsibly be leased in state forests are already under lease. Why don’t they go ahead and drill there? We don’t need additional drilling, certainly not until we look into whether this is the really sensitive habitat that DCNR said it was when we discussed it,” Mundy, D-Kingston, said.
But Mundy later qualified her comments, saying they were dependent on whether leasing that acreage was previously factored as revenue in this year’s state budget. “I’m really not clear on what 32,000 acres that was,” she said.
Rendell’s press release on Tuesday did not clearly specify whether revenue from this most recent lease agreement had previously been factored into the state budget. DCNR had leased about 32,000 acres of state forest land to Anadarko in January for $128 million.
Mundy co-sponsored legislation to impose a moratorium on leasing state forest land for natural gas exploration. House Bill 2235 passed in the House and is before the state Senate.
State Rep. Karen Boback, R-Harveys Lake, who also attended the presentation at Misericordia and voted in favor of the moratorium, said she too had a problem with the lease if the revenue had not been previously included in the state budget.
Both representatives have been outspoken in their concern about potentially harmful effects of natural gas drilling on the environment and have been advocating for stronger laws and regulations to protect public heath and safety and drinking water supplies from potential contamination from gas drilling accidents.
DCNR Press Secretary Chris Novak said Wednesday the specific amount of acreage wasn’t included in this year’s budget or specified in Rendell’s 2010-11 proposal, but legislators had agreed during negotiations for this year’s budget that $180 million for the 2010-11 budget would come from oil and gas leases.
Novak said Rendell had a target of $60 million in revenue from leasing out the 32,000 acres of forest in January, but realized $128 million. That extra $68 million would be applied to the 2010-11 budget, she said.
DCNR also leased 74,000 acres of forest for natural gas exploration in September 2008. A total of 725,000 acres of the state’s 2.2 million acres of forest land has been leased for gas drilling, Novak said.
In addition to the up-front lease payments, which are considered rent for the first year of the leases, the state will receive 18 percent royalties on all natural gas produced on the land for the leases signed this month and in January. The royalty for the September 2008 lease is 16 percent.
Rent for the second through fifth years drops to $20 per acre and then increases to $35 per acre for year six and beyond, Novak said.
Novak said DCNR looked at whether important habitat for rare or endangered species and recreational use would be impacted when designing the leases. She said leases for each of the 11 tracts specify areas that cannot be disturbed by drilling.
She estimated that because of new horizontal drilling techniques and the fact that the newly leased land is surrounded by land that had been leased previously, only a minimal amount of newly leased land – probably about 300 acres total – will be impacted by drilling activities.
Anadarko spokesman Matt Carmichael would not estimate how much land would be disturbed because it was too early in the development phase.
“It’s our hope and desire to disturb as little surface area as possible,” Carmichael said.
Anadarko has drilled about 15 wells on state forest land to date, he said.
Novak said that prior to drilling activities and after the drilling is complete and wellheads are installed, the public will have full access to the leased land.
Mundy and Boback were not available for comment Wednesday after Novak responded to questions related to state budget revenue and the disturbance of sensitive state forest habitat.
Copyright: Times Leader
Chesapeake aims to raise $5 billion
By MURRAY EVANS Associated Press Writer
OKLAHOMA CITY — Chesapeake Energy Corp. said Monday it plans to raise about $5 billion over the next two years in an effort to expand its investment in oil and natural gas liquids and to reduce its debt.
Oklahoma City-based Chesapeake announced a “strategic and financial plan” that includes the sale of up to a 20 percent equity interest in its Chesapeake Appalachia LLC subsidiary to investors within the next three to 12 months. Chesapeake is a key driller in the Appalachian Basin, with 24 operating rigs in the Marcellus Shale natural gas play.
Chesapeake also announced a private placement of $600 million of a new series of convertible preferred stock to investors in Asia. The investors, Maju Investments (Mauritius) Pte Ltd. and Hampton Asset Holding Ltd., will have an option for up to $500 million more shares within the next 30 days.
Of the $5 billion to be raised, Chesapeake said it plans to use $3.5 billion to pay off its debt and $1.5 billion to focus on drilling for oil and natural gas liquids.
Chesapeake also is looking at negotiating various joint ventures as part of its plan, which the company said is ultimately designed to achieve an investment grade rating for its debt securities.
Chesapeake is one of the top independent natural gas producers in the U.S. but has gradually expanded its oil and natural gas liquids portfolio in recent months. Company spokesman Jim Gipson said natural gas accounted for about 90 percent of Chesapeake’s production in the first quarter of 2010, down from 93 percent a year ago.
Chesapeake’s CEO Aubrey McClendon has spoken in recent weeks about the company’s interest in expanding its oil and natural gas liquids production, noting that oil prices are rising while the cost of natural gas is stagnant. Crude oil rose $1.69 to $76.80 per barrel Monday on the New York Mercantile Exchange while natural gas rose 15.5 cents to $4.170 per 1,000 cubic feet.
In a production update issued last week, Chesapeake said it is trying to identify more supplies of oil and natural gas liquids.
Copyright: Times Leader
Rendell backs halt to gas leasing of Pa. forests
MARC LEVY Associated Press Writer
HARRISBURG — Gov. Ed Rendell says the cash-strapped state government is leasing more public forest land to a company that wants to drill for natural gas in the vast Marcellus Shale reserve.
As a result, Rendell said Tuesday he will support legislation to temporarily halt additional leasing of state forest land for gas drilling.
Rendell says Houston-based Anadarko Petroleum Corp. has agreed to pay Pennsylvania $120 million for the right to drill on 33,000 acres in northcentral Pennsylvania.
The company owns the rights to surrounding tracts. The additional land is considered “disturbed” because it has been leased for shallow gas drilling in previous decades, although no drilling is actively occurring.
Still, a bill to halt new leasing of state forest land for drilling appears unlikely to pass the Senate.
Copyright: Times Leader
Drilling’s effect on ‘Clean and Green’ land uncertain
Bill would have rollback taxes assessed only on land impacted by wellhead permanently.
By Steve Mocarskysmocarsky@timesleader.com
Staff Writer
Luzerne County Assessor’s Office Director Tony Alu still doesn’t know how Marcellus Shale development on land with “Clean and Green” designation will affect the land’s tax status.
“We don’t have a clear-cut plan yet. … I’m turning over every stone to get as much information as possible. We won’t be doing anything until I’m sure what our options are,” Alu said Monday.
Clean and Green is a program authorized by state law that allows land devoted to agricultural or forest use to be assessed at a value for that use rather than at fair market value.
The intent of the program, which is administered through county government, is to encourage property owners to retain their land in agricultural, open-space or forest-land use by providing real estate tax relief.
Property owners benefit through lower taxes as long as their land isn’t used for housing developments or other uses inconsistent with agricultural production, open-space or forest-land use.
If a property owner decided to use the land for a purpose inconsistent with the program, the landowner would have to pay “rollback taxes” – the difference between fair market value and use value of the land – for as many years as the property had been designated Clean and Green, up to a maximum of seven years.
Although it’s a state-authorized program, with maximum use values set annually for each county by the Department of Agriculture’s Bureau of Farmland Preservation, the bureau offers no guidance on how drilling for natural gas on a Clean and Green parcel would affect the tax status.
“The (state Farmland and Forest Land Assessment) Act is silent in that regard, so it’s left up to each individual county how to address it,” said bureau director Doug Wolfgang.
However, Wolfgang said, in March 2009, state Sen. Gene Yaw, R-Loyalsock Township, introduced a bill that would amend the act, allowing for natural gas drilling on Clean and Green land, with rollback taxes being assessed only on the portion of land that would be permanently impacted by a wellhead. State Sen. Lisa Baker, R-Lehman Township, was a co-sponsor of that bill.
Yaw represents Union and Sullivan counties and parts of Susquehanna, Bradford and Lycoming counties, which together boasted a total of about 200 natural gas wells by the end of last year.
The bill won Senate approval in February and is before the House for consideration.
Yaw has said the bill would provide counties across the state with “a consistent interpretation” to follow and would “help to prevent differing opinions on how many acres of roll-back taxes should be levied on landowners who have leased for natural gas development.”
He has said farmers and landowners need the bill to become law “so that there isn’t any confusion on how the Clean and Green Program operates.”
The bill also would exempt land with underground transmission or gathering lines from roll-back taxes and would allow for one lease for temporary pipe storage facilities for two years. Each property would have to be restored to its original use.
Regardless of whether the bill becomes law, Lake Township Supervisor Amy Salansky said neither she nor her husband, Paul, will have to pay rollback taxes on their Clean and Green land, on which EnCana Oil and Gas USA intends to drill a natural gas well in August. If county officials decide to assess rollback taxes, the lease with EnCana makes the energy company responsible for paying them.
Salansky noted neither she nor her husband own the mineral or gas rights to the land.
The couple bought the land after the owner died so they could farm it, but the owner had willed the mineral and gas rights to his nephew, who retained them in the sale.
The Salanskys are crop farmers, growing oats, corn and hay. They own and work more farmland nearby, Amy Salansky said.
Even if the entire 50-acre parcel is kicked out of the Clean and Green program, Salansky said she would reapply to have the parcel accepted back into the program, minus the 6 acres that would be used for the gas-drilling operations.
Steve Mocarsky, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7311.
Copyright: Times Leader