Posts Tagged ‘oil and gas’

A few years ago every geologist involved in Appalachian Basin oil and gas knew about the Devonian black shale called the Marcellus. Its black color made it easy to spot in the field and its slightly radioactive signature made it a very easy pick on a geophysical well log.

However, very few of these geologists were excited about the Marcellus Shale as a major source of natural gas. Wells drilled through it produced some gas but rarely in enormous quantity. Few if any in the natural gas industry suspected that the Marcellus might soon be a major contributor to the natural gas supply of the United States – large enough to be spoken of as a “super giant” gas field.

Copyright: Geology.com

Cleaner than coal and cheaper than oil, a 90-year supply is under our feet, experts say.

By MARK WILLIAMSAP Energy Writer

An unlikely source of energy has emerged to meet international demands that the United States do more to fight global warming: It’s cleaner than coal, cheaper than oil and a 90-year supply is under our feet.

It’s natural gas, the same fossil fuel that was in such short supply a decade ago that it was deemed unreliable. It’s now being uncovered at such a rapid pace that its price is near a seven-year low.

Long used to heat half the nation’s homes, it’s becoming the fuel of choice when building new power plants. Someday, it may win wider acceptance as a replacement for gasoline in our cars and trucks.

Natural gas’ abundance and low price come as governments around the world debate how to curtail carbon dioxide and other pollution that contribute to global warming. The likely outcome is a tax on companies that spew excessive greenhouse gases. Utilities and other companies see natural gas as a way to lower emissions — and their costs. Yet politicians aren’t stumping for it.

In June, President Barack Obama lumped natural gas with oil and coal as energy sources the nation must move away from. He touts alternative sources — solar, wind and biofuels derived from corn and other plants. In Congress, the energy debate has focused on finding cleaner coal and saving thousands of mining jobs from West Virginia to Wyoming.

Utilities in the U.S. aren’t waiting for Washington to jump on the gas bandwagon. Looming climate legislation has altered the calculus that they use to determine the cheapest way to deliver power. Coal may still be cheaper, but natural gas emits half as much carbon when burned to generate the same amount electricity.

Today, about 27 percent of the nation’s carbon dioxide emissions come from coal-fired power plants, which generate 44 percent of the electricity used in the U.S. Just under 25 percent of power comes from burning natural gas, more than double its share a decade ago but still with room to grow.

But the fuel has to be plentiful and its price stable — and that has not always been the case with natural gas. In the 1990s, factories that wanted to burn gas instead of coal had to install equipment that did both because the gas supply was uncertain and wild price swings were common. In some states, because of feared shortages, homebuilders were told new gas hookups were banned.

It’s a different story today. Energy experts believe that the huge volume of supply now will ease price swings and supply worries.

Gas now trades on futures markets for about $5.50 per 1,000 cubic feet. While that’s up from a recent low of $2.41 in September as the recession reduced demand and storage caverns filled to overflowing, it’s less than half what it was in the summer of 2008 when oil prices surged close to $150 a barrel.

Oil and gas prices trends have since diverged, due to the recession and the growing realization of just how much gas has been discovered in the last three years. That’s thanks to the introduction of horizontal drilling technology that has unlocked stunning amounts of gas in what were before off-limits shale formations. Estimates of total gas reserves have jumped 58 percent from 2004 to 2008, giving the U.S. a 90-year supply at the current usage rate of about 23 trillion cubic feet of year.

The only question is whether enough gas can be delivered at affordable enough prices for these trends to accelerate.

The world’s largest oil company, Exxon Mobil Corp., gave its answer last Monday when it announced a $30 billion deal to acquire XTO Energy Inc. The move will make it the country’s No. 1 producer of natural gas.

Exxon expects to be able to dramatically boost natural gas sales to electric utilities. In fact, CEO Rex Tillerson says that’s why the deal is such a smart investment.

Tillerson says he sees demand for natural gas growing 50 percent by 2030, much of it for electricity generation and running factories. Decisions being made by executives at power companies lend credence to that forecast.

Consider Progress Energy Inc., which scrapped a $2 billion plan this month to add scrubbers needed to reduce sulfur emissions at 4 older coal-fired power plants in North Carolina. Instead, it will phase out those plants and redirect a portion of those funds toward cleaner burning gas-fired plants.

Lloyd Yates, CEO of Progess Energy Carolina, says planners were 99 percent certain that retrofitting plants made sense when they began a review late last year. But then gas prices began falling and the recession prompted gas-turbine makers to slash prices just as global warming pressures intensified.

“Everyone saw it pretty quickly,” he says. Out went coal, in comes gas. “The environmental component of coal is where we see instability.”

Nevada power company NV Energy Inc. canceled plans for a $5 billion coal-fired plant early this year. That came after its homestate senator, Majority Leader Harry Reid, made it clear he would fight to block its approval, and executives’ fears mounted about the costs of meeting future environmental rules.

“It was obvious to us that Congress or the EPA or both were going to act to reduce carbon emissions,” said CEO Michael Yackira, whose utility already gets two-thirds of its electricity from gas-fired units. “Without understanding the economic ramifications, it would have been foolish for us to go forward.”

Even with an expected jump in demand from utilities, gas prices won’t rise much beyond $6.50 per 1,000 cubic feet for years to come, says Ken Medlock, an energy fellow at the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy at Rice University in Houston. That tracks an Energy Department estimate made last week.

Such forecasts are based in part on a belief that the recent spurt in gas discoveries may only be the start of a golden age for gas drillers — one that creates wealth that rivals the so-called Gusher Age of the early 20th century, when strikes in Texas created a new class of oil barons.

XTO, the company that Exxon is buying, was one of the pioneers in developing new drilling technologies that allow a single well to descend 9,000 feet and then bore horizontally through shale formations up to 1 1/2 miles away. Water, sand and chemical additives are pumped through these pipes to unlock trillions of cubic feet of natural gas that until recently had been judged unobtainable.

Even with the big increases in reserves they were logging, expansion plans by XTO and its rivals were limited by the debt they took on to finance these projects that can cost as much as $3 million apiece.

Under Exxon, which earned $45.2 billion last year, that barrier has been obliterated.

Copyright: Times Leader

Court will hear landowners’ claims that gas companies took advantage of them.

MARC LEVY Associated Press Writer

HARRISBURG — Pennsylvania landowners who want to snatch a better deal from natural gas companies hoping to drill into their ground and the potentially lucrative Marcellus Shale formation beneath it will get the ear of the state’s highest court.

Wednesday’s oral arguments in front of the state Supreme Court are certain to be watched closely for its impact on one of Pennsylvania’s biggest economic opportunities and environmental challenges in decades.

For exploration companies with offices from Calgary to Canonsburg, the decision could either bring a huge sigh of relief or the havoc of renegotiating land leases across the state, possibly throwing the entire gas industry into chaos.

The fact that the court moved quickly to hear the case — and resolve a burgeoning number of complaints in state and federal courts — demonstrates the seriousness of the matter.

“By its actions, I think the court recognizes that this really is an extraordinary issue for Pennsylvania and it’s critically important that it is resolved,” said David Fine, a Harrisburg-based lawyer representing ElexCo Land Services Inc. and Southwestern Energy Production Co.

To some extent, justices will hear plaintiffs’ attorneys tell a story of big corporations taking advantage of unsuspecting landowners, paying them a fraction of the upfront per-acre leasing fee that they later paid to other landowners as competition in the land rush intensified.

“They didn’t know Marcellus Shale from a hole in the wall and they feel the gas companies came in and got them to sell away the rights to their property,” said attorney Laurence M. Kelly, who is representing Susquehanna County landowner Herbert Kilmer and his family.

The real legal question will be whether some tens of thousands of leases were never valid because they violate a state law that guarantees landowners a minimum one-eighth royalty from the production of oil and gas on their land.

The lawsuits are just the latest sign that Pennsylvania’s laws governing mineral rights and environmental protection are lagging behind the large, modern-day industry presence that has descended here.

Dozens of exploration companies and contractors have flocked here since early 2008 from as far away as Houston, Denver, and Calgary, Alberta, in a rush to lock up land rights over the thickest portions of the shale. That rush has eased somewhat since the recession drove down natural gas prices — but the legal disputes have not.

By Fine’s estimate, more than 70 lawsuits have been filed in federal and state courts by plaintiffs seeking a judgment that the leases they signed were never valid.

In general, the leases in question give the exploration company the right to subtract certain costs — such as taxes, assessments or transportation — before paying the 12.5 percent royalty. That violates the law, plaintiffs say.

The law, however, is silent on the meaning of “royalty” and whether it is determined before or after those expenses.

Fine and industry officials say it is standard language in leases to deduct those costs — a contention disputed by landowner advocates in Pennsylvania and elsewhere.

But judicial decisions in two of the cases raised the prospect of a myriad of different legal opinions.

In Susquehanna County, the judge in the Kilmer vs. ElexCo case handed the companies an initial victory, saying the law does not specifically prohibit the subtraction of costs. Kilmer has appealed to state Superior Court.

Separately, a federal judge in Scranton hearing a case against Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. denied a motion to dismiss the case, saying the law’s silence does not necessarily mean the costs can be legally deducted.

Fine decided to ask the state Supreme Court to take up Kilmer vs. Elexco immediately, and effectively settle the matter for everyone.

Still, the high court’s decision could create a new kind of chaos. Records of oil and gas leases dating back to the royalty law of 1979 are kept in county courthouses, often in arcane filing systems, making it nearly impossible to know how many landowners and leases are potentially affected.

“I’m sure that no one person knows,” Kelly said.

Copyright: Times Leader

Company files documents to drill in Luzerne County, has leased 17,500 acres.

By Jennifer Learn-Andesjandes@timesleader.com
Luzerne County Reporter

Natural gas drilling may be about to boom in Luzerne County.

Denver-based WhitMar Exploration Co. recently submitted 200 lease documents to ensure that they have the correct property identification numbers, or PINS. Pin certification is required before the leases are officially recorded in the county recorder of deeds office.

The documents show the company has acquired drilling rights on 5,440 acres in Harveys Lake and the following townships: Ross, Lake, Lehman, Fairmount, Union, Huntington and Jackson.

WhitMar representative Brad Shepard said the company has leased 17,500 acres in Luzerne County to date, with more planned. Shepard said he was too busy with planning meetings Tuesday to explain how the drilling will be executed.

Beth Chocallo, a Lake Township property owner who agreed to lease her 3.29 acres to WhitMar, said she and her husband, Richard, were connected to WhitMar through a seminar.

The couple did not receive any upfront payment, she said. Instead, WhitMar will pay a lease rental after the first year or two and a percentage of the profits if natural gas is extracted, Chocallo said.

Chocallo she is optimistic that gas will be found because she doesn’t believe WhitMar would invest in the time and expense of preparing leases without a strong likelihood.

“Who knows where the gas pockets will be found? It’s not a definite,” she said.

WhitMar plans to grid out territories, paying a profit percentage to the owners of all leased property within that grid if gas is extracted, Chocallo said.

She does not believe a drilling rig will be installed on her property because the parcel is on the smaller side compared to others being leased, but she can’t rule out the possibility. Her main concern was that drilling would cut off or diminish her water supply, but she said WhitMar assured her that the company would replace the well and furnish water if that happens.

The lease documents filed in the county do not contain any details about what will be paid to the property owners.

Property owners are leasing WhitMar the exclusive right to explore for and develop oil and gas, the documents say.

That right includes use of the property for the drilling of oil and gas wells and installation of roads, pipes, pumps, compressors, separators, tanks, power stations and any other necessary equipment, the documents say.

Most, if not all, of the leases are for one year, with the option to extend for an additional 11 years or longer.

Of the 200 leases, Fairmount Township had the most property signed with WhitMar – 2,512 acres – followed by Ross Township with 1,205 acres.

Here’s a breakdown of the other leased acreages: Harveys Lake, 58; Jackson Township, 99; Union Township, 102; Huntington Township, 361; Lake Township, 463; and Lehman Township, 640.

Founded in 1979, WhitMar is a private energy operation actively engaged in drilling and developing natural gas and oil prospects in the United States, according to the company’s Web site.

Jennifer Learn-Andes, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 831-7333.

Copyright: Times Leader

Gas industry officials told state senators in Dallas that cumbersome rules make it difficult to operate.

MICHAEL RUBINKAM Associated Press Writer

DALLAS — Executives of drilling companies exploring a huge untapped reserve of natural gas say the economic windfall expected from the Marcellus Shale may not come to pass if Pennsylvania doesn’t get its regulatory house in order.

Industry officials complained Tuesday about a time-consuming and lengthy permitting process and cumbersome regulations that, on top of plummeting natural gas prices and the credit crisis, is making it difficult for them to operate in Pennsylvania.

“I have great hopes for what the Marcellus Shale play might still hold for Pennsylvania. Unfortunately, my experience to date does not lead me to be very optimistic,” Wendy Straatman, president of Exco-North Coast Energy Inc., told Republican state senators at a hearing in northeastern Pennsylvania.

She said the Akron, Ohio-based company has moved drilling equipment to West Virginia and delayed its plan to transfer a “significant number” of employees into Pennsylvania because of DEP permitting delays that are “unlike anything we have seen in any other state in which we operate.”

Another executive, Scott Rotruck of Oklahoma City-based Chesapeake Energy Corp., the largest natural gas producer in the United States, predicted “ominous” consequences for Marcellus development if Pennsylvania’s regulatory environment doesn’t become more welcoming. He said the permitting process is easier and less costly in other states.

Sympathetic GOP senators pressed acting Environmental Secretary John Hanger for answers, warning that Pennsylvania can’t afford to scare off an industry that has promised to create tens of thousands of new jobs.

The state needs to be “careful we are not killing the goose that’s laying the golden egg,” said Sen. Mary Jo White, R-Venango.

Hanger agreed that regulations need to be streamlined and said his agency is working on it, but added that most applications are processed within 45 days.

“There has to be a smart way to protect what we need to protect, and at the same time (prevent) a delay that really serves no purpose,” he said. “I believe there’s a learning curve here for everyone involved.”

Part of the problem may be a lack of DEP manpower to cope with a record number of natural gas applications. The agency is on track to issue 8,000 permits in 2008, up from 2,000 in 1999, yet staffing in the agency’s oil and gas division has remained stable at about 80. The DEP has proposed to raise fees on drilling companies to pay for additional staff to process applications and inspect wells.

Tuesday’s hearing at Misericordia University was called by the Senate Majority Policy Committee to explore the economic and environmental impact of drilling in the Marcellus, a layer of rock deep underground that experts say holds vast stores of largely untapped natural gas.

Industry executives also opposed a tax on natural gas that the administration of Gov. Ed Rendell has said it is considering.

“New taxes will stymie Marcellus development,” said Ray Walker Jr., vice president of Range Resources Corp., a Texas-based oil and gas company with an office in southwestern Pennsylvania.

Copyright: Times Leader

Property owners claim in lawsuit agent offered lower royalty than allowed by law.

MARC LEVY Associated Press Writer

HARRISBURG — Scores of people who own land above a potentially lucrative natural gas reservoir are seeking to void the drilling leases they signed and accused a land agent of guaranteeing a lower royalty than the amount allowed by state law.

The property owners filed a lawsuit in federal court in Williamsport last week against The Keeton Group LLC, of Lexington, Ky.

The lawsuit stems from a rush of activity by exploration companies to capitalize on the largely untapped Marcellus Shale gas reservoir while natural gas prices are high. Property owners from West Virginia to New York have complained of aggressive “landmen” pushing them to sign leases that allow an exploration company to drill down to the Marcellus Shale, a layer of thick black rock that holds a vast reservoir of gas.

The law cited by the plaintiffs guarantees a property owner at least one-eighth of the royalties from the recovery of oil and gas on their land. However, the suit said the leases violate state law because they give the exploration company the right to subtract taxes, assessments and adjustments on production from the 12.5 percent royalty.

The suit, filed Thursday, said the approximately 130 plaintiffs own more than 18,000 acres in Sullivan and Lycoming counties in northern Pennsylvania. The contracts were signed with Keeton between April 2005 and March 2006, the suit said.

A telephone message left Tuesday with The Keeton Group was not immediately returned. On an outdated version of its Web site, Keeton touts its record as an early arrival on the Marcellus Shale.

“Our group was among the first to acquire lease rights for the current Marcellus Shale drilling activities — not only in Pennsylvania but also in 7 other states under which this vast geological formation lies,” the Keeton site said.

The gas reservoir beneath the Marcellus Shale was long known to exist, but only recently has drilling technology improved enough to cost-effectively tap into it. According to state officials, drilling activity on the formation is taking place at about 275 well sites, and less than 20 sites are producing gas.

To date, exploration companies have spent about $2 billion on leasing land, performing seismic studies and other activities in pursuit of Marcellus Shale gas in Pennsylvania, according to Stephen Rhoads, the president of the Pennsylvania Oil and Gas Association.

Companies as large as ExxonMobil Corp. have shown interest in Pennsylvania, which is one of four states that sit atop 54,000 square miles that analysts say hold the best exploration prospects.

Copyright: Times Leader

Lucrative leasing deals are possible for area residents. Negatives: Noise, pollution.

The opportunity won’t come to most Northeastern Pennsylvania landowners, but those offered a natural-gas well will face life-changing effects, both positive and negative.

“It’s going to transform Pennsylvania, there’s no doubt about it,” said Ken Balliet, a Penn State Cooperative Extension director well-versed in gas-lease issues. “This whole Marcellus shale play is highly speculative” for the gas companies, he said, because it’s not very well studied, but landowners who land lucrative deals will see it otherwise. “When you hand someone a check for half a million dollars, that’s not very speculative.”

Add to that well-siting and annual royalty payments, and suddenly the problem becomes trying to find tax havens for the profits.

The tradeoff, however, is an unexpected and sometimes unwelcome bustling of activity — trucks, noise and pollution. Many of the changes will come and go, but some – like a clear-cut well site or a noisy compression station – will remain for decades.

It’s a sacrifice Jerry Riaubia is willing to make on his 16 acres in Sweet Valley – if the right number is on the checks and they keep coming. “If I had an income for my family, it would be well worth it,” he said. “We could help the economy out if we had that money. It could save our economy.”

For many rural landowners, the offers are difficult to pass up. Reports of leases offered at $2,500 per acre are common as close as Wyoming County, and companies have increased production royalties from the state-mandated 12.5 percent to 18 percent as owners become more educated.

Even with just his 16 acres in a standard 600-acre drilling unit, and estimating modest gas extraction at 18 percent royalties on a single well, Riaubia stands to pocket around $117,000 over the well’s lifetime, according to www.pagaslease.com, a Web site run by landowners who were approached early on about leasing.

That’s only the profits from a single well, and far more than one can exist at a site. “We heard of one company had drilled 27 on one pad,” said Tom Murphy, a Penn State Cooperative Extension educator.

And as oil prices increase, so will natural gas prices, according to a 2005 report by the Schlumberger oil and gas company. “The price of gas is linked to oil and based on each fuel’s heating value,” the report notes. “As long as oil prices remain high, there is no reason for natural gas prices to go down. Although gas is abundant in much of the world, it is expensive and potentially dangerous to transport internationally.”

That financial windfall might be just a pipedream for Luzerne County residents, though.

Chesapeake Energy Corp., one of the largest leaseholders in the Marcellus play, isn’t leasing in the county, according to Matt Sheppard, the company’s director of corporate development. A single listing exists for Luzerne County on the gas lease Web site’s lease tracker. Signed in late May, the five-year offer was $1,500 per acre with 15 percent royalties.

While Riaubia said he hasn’t been approached by any companies, land groups in northern municipalities in the county, such as Franklin Township, have been negotiating. Rod McGuirk, who owns 56 acres in the township, said owners there have been offered $1,800 per acre. “They’re just preliminary offers, but we’re excited,” he said.

That excitement could quickly wane if problems crop up or owners are unprepared for the realities of drilling. Unlike other unconventional gas sources, shale wells produce consistently over three decades, so well sites are more or less permanent. Even after sites are reclaimed, some infrastructure is left behind.

Also, because gas is transported nationally through lines that are more compressed than regional distribution lines, noisy compression stations will need to be installed in what are otherwise bucolically quiet locales.

Then there’s the potential to unearth radioactive materials, acid-producing minerals and deplete water resources. In fact, after concerns arose about the amount of water necessary to drill a well, the state Department of Environmental Protection included an addendum to its drilling permit that addresses water usage and is specific to Marcellus shale.

Still, officials assure that regulatory agencies are keeping tabs on drillers. “There’s an awful lot of eyes watching the streams up there,” DEP spokesman Tom Rathbun said. “So these guys aren’t just going to be able to dump stuff. … If they start killing streams, a lot of people are going to find out quickly.”

And aside from that, he said, the financials force the industry to regulate itself. “The Marcellus shale is not really a business for fly-by-nighters,” he said. “You don’t throw $10 million away because you were cutting corners on an environmental regulation. Now that they know we’re watching … there’s too much money on the line for these guys to do stupid mistakes or to cut corners.”

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader

Gas leasing! When I first wrote about this in May last year, lease prices were “up to several hundred dollars an acre.” When I did an update in December, prices “as high as $800” were said to be offered. Now $2,500 an acre is thought to be a reasonable price. Who knows how high it may go? Statewide, speculation about the most promising part of the Marcellus Shale is being directed solidly toward northeastern Pennsylvania.

The issues I mentioned in my first article are still valid concerns: clearing of trees and vegetation at the drilling site and for access roads; noise, lights, and vehicle and human traffic during the drilling process; and the risk of water supply interruption or contamination. Several water-related issues have come into higher prominence since then: the source and disposal of the water used in drilling and hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”) a gas well, and the removal and disposal of solid and liquid wastes from the well site.

Representatives of land trusts from around the state, including Countryside Conservancy, met in Harrisburg in mid-June to learn more about the Marcellus Shale gas resource, how it will be developed, and how gas extraction can coexist with conservation. The conference organizer, the Pennsylvania Land Trust Association ( www.conserveland.org), has indicated that they will soon post information from this meeting on their website.

As a land trust, the Countryside Conservancy is dedicated to land and water conservation. We are not opposed to exploration and extraction of natural gas, but we want to ensure that the process does not damage natural resources of conservation value. To that end, we are working hard to educate ourselves about the pros and cons of gas development, and we urge landowners to do the same.

At the moment, one of the more accessible information resources for landowners is the Penn State Cooperative Extension website (naturalgaslease.pbwiki.com). It contains information, publications, links to lawyers, CPAs, energy companies and more. The Extension does not recommend the services of anyone referred to on their website, but it is a place to start.

If you are a landowner considering leasing your gas rights, you will NOT want to sign any lease you are given by a gas or leasing company. There are many provisions that may need to be added to a lease to protect you, your land and your finances. A small sampling of things that you may want your lease to dictate, beyond leasing rates and royalties: removal of waste materials from the site; bearing the costs of Clean and Green or other tax penalties; lease extension clauses; permitting gas storage and transmission in addition to extraction; “shut-in” or “holding by production” clauses; defining the primary vs. secondary term of the lease; controlling the number of wells permitted on a property; timber payment for any trees removed; use of ponds as a water source; testing and protection of drinking water supply; the “Pugh Clause”; the landowner’s right to audit the operator’s production data; and landowner indemnification. This is not a comprehensive list, just an illustration that leases are complex legal documents.

Our #1 advice remains: talk to a lawyer who has experience in this field. You do not want to sign any important legal document that may change your land forever without having a lawyer on your side.

Also, get your well water tested. In fact, even if you are not leasing but your neighbors are, it is an excellent idea to test your water supply so that you will have pre-drilling baseline data. The testing needs to be done by a DEP-certified lab in order to be admissible for legal purposes. You can visit the Department of Environmental Protection website ( www.dep.state.pa.us) for a list of approved labs and other information (search under “Energy,” then “oil and gas wells”).

We at the Conservancy are not geologists or gas-rights lawyers, but we are dedicated to helping landowners make the best decisions for their land. We will do our best to put landowners in touch with people who can provide sound advice.

I can’t do better than quote the disclaimer on the Penn State Cooperative Extension web site: This information is for educational purposes only. The information posted here is NOT to be considered as legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney before signing anything!

Last call for the Countryside Conservancy’s 9th Annual Auction! The Auction takes place Saturday, July 12 on the green at Keystone College and tickets are still available. The party starts at 6 pm. Call 945-6995 now to reserve your place!

Mary Felley is the Executive Director of the Countryside Conservancy. Contact her at 945-6995 or cconserv@epix.net

Copyright: Times Leader