Posts Tagged ‘oil prices’

By MURRAY EVANS Associated Press Writer

OKLAHOMA CITY — Chesapeake Energy Corp. said Monday it plans to raise about $5 billion over the next two years in an effort to expand its investment in oil and natural gas liquids and to reduce its debt.

Oklahoma City-based Chesapeake announced a “strategic and financial plan” that includes the sale of up to a 20 percent equity interest in its Chesapeake Appalachia LLC subsidiary to investors within the next three to 12 months. Chesapeake is a key driller in the Appalachian Basin, with 24 operating rigs in the Marcellus Shale natural gas play.

Chesapeake also announced a private placement of $600 million of a new series of convertible preferred stock to investors in Asia. The investors, Maju Investments (Mauritius) Pte Ltd. and Hampton Asset Holding Ltd., will have an option for up to $500 million more shares within the next 30 days.

Of the $5 billion to be raised, Chesapeake said it plans to use $3.5 billion to pay off its debt and $1.5 billion to focus on drilling for oil and natural gas liquids.

Chesapeake also is looking at negotiating various joint ventures as part of its plan, which the company said is ultimately designed to achieve an investment grade rating for its debt securities.

Chesapeake is one of the top independent natural gas producers in the U.S. but has gradually expanded its oil and natural gas liquids portfolio in recent months. Company spokesman Jim Gipson said natural gas accounted for about 90 percent of Chesapeake’s production in the first quarter of 2010, down from 93 percent a year ago.

Chesapeake’s CEO Aubrey McClendon has spoken in recent weeks about the company’s interest in expanding its oil and natural gas liquids production, noting that oil prices are rising while the cost of natural gas is stagnant. Crude oil rose $1.69 to $76.80 per barrel Monday on the New York Mercantile Exchange while natural gas rose 15.5 cents to $4.170 per 1,000 cubic feet.

In a production update issued last week, Chesapeake said it is trying to identify more supplies of oil and natural gas liquids.

Copyright: Times Leader

Cleaner than coal and cheaper than oil, a 90-year supply is under our feet, experts say.

By MARK WILLIAMSAP Energy Writer

An unlikely source of energy has emerged to meet international demands that the United States do more to fight global warming: It’s cleaner than coal, cheaper than oil and a 90-year supply is under our feet.

It’s natural gas, the same fossil fuel that was in such short supply a decade ago that it was deemed unreliable. It’s now being uncovered at such a rapid pace that its price is near a seven-year low.

Long used to heat half the nation’s homes, it’s becoming the fuel of choice when building new power plants. Someday, it may win wider acceptance as a replacement for gasoline in our cars and trucks.

Natural gas’ abundance and low price come as governments around the world debate how to curtail carbon dioxide and other pollution that contribute to global warming. The likely outcome is a tax on companies that spew excessive greenhouse gases. Utilities and other companies see natural gas as a way to lower emissions — and their costs. Yet politicians aren’t stumping for it.

In June, President Barack Obama lumped natural gas with oil and coal as energy sources the nation must move away from. He touts alternative sources — solar, wind and biofuels derived from corn and other plants. In Congress, the energy debate has focused on finding cleaner coal and saving thousands of mining jobs from West Virginia to Wyoming.

Utilities in the U.S. aren’t waiting for Washington to jump on the gas bandwagon. Looming climate legislation has altered the calculus that they use to determine the cheapest way to deliver power. Coal may still be cheaper, but natural gas emits half as much carbon when burned to generate the same amount electricity.

Today, about 27 percent of the nation’s carbon dioxide emissions come from coal-fired power plants, which generate 44 percent of the electricity used in the U.S. Just under 25 percent of power comes from burning natural gas, more than double its share a decade ago but still with room to grow.

But the fuel has to be plentiful and its price stable — and that has not always been the case with natural gas. In the 1990s, factories that wanted to burn gas instead of coal had to install equipment that did both because the gas supply was uncertain and wild price swings were common. In some states, because of feared shortages, homebuilders were told new gas hookups were banned.

It’s a different story today. Energy experts believe that the huge volume of supply now will ease price swings and supply worries.

Gas now trades on futures markets for about $5.50 per 1,000 cubic feet. While that’s up from a recent low of $2.41 in September as the recession reduced demand and storage caverns filled to overflowing, it’s less than half what it was in the summer of 2008 when oil prices surged close to $150 a barrel.

Oil and gas prices trends have since diverged, due to the recession and the growing realization of just how much gas has been discovered in the last three years. That’s thanks to the introduction of horizontal drilling technology that has unlocked stunning amounts of gas in what were before off-limits shale formations. Estimates of total gas reserves have jumped 58 percent from 2004 to 2008, giving the U.S. a 90-year supply at the current usage rate of about 23 trillion cubic feet of year.

The only question is whether enough gas can be delivered at affordable enough prices for these trends to accelerate.

The world’s largest oil company, Exxon Mobil Corp., gave its answer last Monday when it announced a $30 billion deal to acquire XTO Energy Inc. The move will make it the country’s No. 1 producer of natural gas.

Exxon expects to be able to dramatically boost natural gas sales to electric utilities. In fact, CEO Rex Tillerson says that’s why the deal is such a smart investment.

Tillerson says he sees demand for natural gas growing 50 percent by 2030, much of it for electricity generation and running factories. Decisions being made by executives at power companies lend credence to that forecast.

Consider Progress Energy Inc., which scrapped a $2 billion plan this month to add scrubbers needed to reduce sulfur emissions at 4 older coal-fired power plants in North Carolina. Instead, it will phase out those plants and redirect a portion of those funds toward cleaner burning gas-fired plants.

Lloyd Yates, CEO of Progess Energy Carolina, says planners were 99 percent certain that retrofitting plants made sense when they began a review late last year. But then gas prices began falling and the recession prompted gas-turbine makers to slash prices just as global warming pressures intensified.

“Everyone saw it pretty quickly,” he says. Out went coal, in comes gas. “The environmental component of coal is where we see instability.”

Nevada power company NV Energy Inc. canceled plans for a $5 billion coal-fired plant early this year. That came after its homestate senator, Majority Leader Harry Reid, made it clear he would fight to block its approval, and executives’ fears mounted about the costs of meeting future environmental rules.

“It was obvious to us that Congress or the EPA or both were going to act to reduce carbon emissions,” said CEO Michael Yackira, whose utility already gets two-thirds of its electricity from gas-fired units. “Without understanding the economic ramifications, it would have been foolish for us to go forward.”

Even with an expected jump in demand from utilities, gas prices won’t rise much beyond $6.50 per 1,000 cubic feet for years to come, says Ken Medlock, an energy fellow at the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy at Rice University in Houston. That tracks an Energy Department estimate made last week.

Such forecasts are based in part on a belief that the recent spurt in gas discoveries may only be the start of a golden age for gas drillers — one that creates wealth that rivals the so-called Gusher Age of the early 20th century, when strikes in Texas created a new class of oil barons.

XTO, the company that Exxon is buying, was one of the pioneers in developing new drilling technologies that allow a single well to descend 9,000 feet and then bore horizontally through shale formations up to 1 1/2 miles away. Water, sand and chemical additives are pumped through these pipes to unlock trillions of cubic feet of natural gas that until recently had been judged unobtainable.

Even with the big increases in reserves they were logging, expansion plans by XTO and its rivals were limited by the debt they took on to finance these projects that can cost as much as $3 million apiece.

Under Exxon, which earned $45.2 billion last year, that barrier has been obliterated.

Copyright: Times Leader

Lucrative leasing deals are possible for area residents. Negatives: Noise, pollution.

The opportunity won’t come to most Northeastern Pennsylvania landowners, but those offered a natural-gas well will face life-changing effects, both positive and negative.

“It’s going to transform Pennsylvania, there’s no doubt about it,” said Ken Balliet, a Penn State Cooperative Extension director well-versed in gas-lease issues. “This whole Marcellus shale play is highly speculative” for the gas companies, he said, because it’s not very well studied, but landowners who land lucrative deals will see it otherwise. “When you hand someone a check for half a million dollars, that’s not very speculative.”

Add to that well-siting and annual royalty payments, and suddenly the problem becomes trying to find tax havens for the profits.

The tradeoff, however, is an unexpected and sometimes unwelcome bustling of activity — trucks, noise and pollution. Many of the changes will come and go, but some – like a clear-cut well site or a noisy compression station – will remain for decades.

It’s a sacrifice Jerry Riaubia is willing to make on his 16 acres in Sweet Valley – if the right number is on the checks and they keep coming. “If I had an income for my family, it would be well worth it,” he said. “We could help the economy out if we had that money. It could save our economy.”

For many rural landowners, the offers are difficult to pass up. Reports of leases offered at $2,500 per acre are common as close as Wyoming County, and companies have increased production royalties from the state-mandated 12.5 percent to 18 percent as owners become more educated.

Even with just his 16 acres in a standard 600-acre drilling unit, and estimating modest gas extraction at 18 percent royalties on a single well, Riaubia stands to pocket around $117,000 over the well’s lifetime, according to www.pagaslease.com, a Web site run by landowners who were approached early on about leasing.

That’s only the profits from a single well, and far more than one can exist at a site. “We heard of one company had drilled 27 on one pad,” said Tom Murphy, a Penn State Cooperative Extension educator.

And as oil prices increase, so will natural gas prices, according to a 2005 report by the Schlumberger oil and gas company. “The price of gas is linked to oil and based on each fuel’s heating value,” the report notes. “As long as oil prices remain high, there is no reason for natural gas prices to go down. Although gas is abundant in much of the world, it is expensive and potentially dangerous to transport internationally.”

That financial windfall might be just a pipedream for Luzerne County residents, though.

Chesapeake Energy Corp., one of the largest leaseholders in the Marcellus play, isn’t leasing in the county, according to Matt Sheppard, the company’s director of corporate development. A single listing exists for Luzerne County on the gas lease Web site’s lease tracker. Signed in late May, the five-year offer was $1,500 per acre with 15 percent royalties.

While Riaubia said he hasn’t been approached by any companies, land groups in northern municipalities in the county, such as Franklin Township, have been negotiating. Rod McGuirk, who owns 56 acres in the township, said owners there have been offered $1,800 per acre. “They’re just preliminary offers, but we’re excited,” he said.

That excitement could quickly wane if problems crop up or owners are unprepared for the realities of drilling. Unlike other unconventional gas sources, shale wells produce consistently over three decades, so well sites are more or less permanent. Even after sites are reclaimed, some infrastructure is left behind.

Also, because gas is transported nationally through lines that are more compressed than regional distribution lines, noisy compression stations will need to be installed in what are otherwise bucolically quiet locales.

Then there’s the potential to unearth radioactive materials, acid-producing minerals and deplete water resources. In fact, after concerns arose about the amount of water necessary to drill a well, the state Department of Environmental Protection included an addendum to its drilling permit that addresses water usage and is specific to Marcellus shale.

Still, officials assure that regulatory agencies are keeping tabs on drillers. “There’s an awful lot of eyes watching the streams up there,” DEP spokesman Tom Rathbun said. “So these guys aren’t just going to be able to dump stuff. … If they start killing streams, a lot of people are going to find out quickly.”

And aside from that, he said, the financials force the industry to regulate itself. “The Marcellus shale is not really a business for fly-by-nighters,” he said. “You don’t throw $10 million away because you were cutting corners on an environmental regulation. Now that they know we’re watching … there’s too much money on the line for these guys to do stupid mistakes or to cut corners.”

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader