Posts Tagged ‘Rory Sweeney’

More than 650 acres are available. Drilling firms being contacted directly.

By Rory Sweeneyrsweeney@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

Luzerne County began seeking bids Monday to lease more than 650 acres at Moon Lake Park for natural gas drilling.

In an effort to entice a bidder, county engineer Joe Gibbons said he is contacting drilling companies directly.

“I’m trying to swing it in our favor. I’m sending e-mails out to the gas industry to see if anyone’s interested in receiving a set of bid documents,” he said. “It’s up in the air because the commodities are in the tank right now. … I’m kind of optimistic. I hope we get somebody.”

Potential bidders can review and pick up the documents at the county property and supply office in Penn Place at 20 N. Pennsylvania Ave., Wilkes-Barre. The bids are due by 2 p.m. April 23, but must be pre-qualified by April 9.

The proposal is modeled, Gibbons said, on that used by the state Department of Conservation and Natural Resources.

The request for proposals was structured, he said, so that the county receives several revenue sources from the deal and retains authority over where drill pads would be located in the park. “The last thing I want to do is make the place look like an open construction site. I want to maintain its recreational integrity. It’s just a unique project,” he said.

The county would receive income from the rental of the drilled acreage; the sale of the timber felled when preparing the drilling sites; other marketable fluids, such as methane or oil, that are extracted from the drilling; and storage fees for gas that is stored when an exploratory well is drilled, but capped until it can be hooked up to a pipeline, he said. “They can have the storage, that’s fine, but we get the storage rental,” he said.

All bidders would have to offer at least 16 percent royalties on the price at the well head for any marketable fluids it produces, he said.

The winning bidder will offer the highest initial-year rental fee for the acreage, he said, which was set for at least $500 per acre. After that, the fee drops to between $10 and $20 per year, he said, but there is a stipulation that drilling begin within a year.

The winning bidder would post three bonds, including one to ensure the site is restored after drilling concludes, he said. “I put restrictions on where they could take water from and how much they could take, even above and beyond what DEP (the state Department of Environmental Protection) would issue in a mining permit,” he said.

The bids would also have to be pre-qualified to ensure they are from actual drilling companies planning development and not land-holding companies expecting to resell the land, he said. “If we do get a lease, I want to deal directly with the gas company. I don’t want to go through a middle man,” he said.

Copyright: Times Leader

State is not seeing the same reduction in Marcellus Shale drilling as other areas.

By Rory Sweeneyrsweeney@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

SCRANTON – The price of natural gas has dropped nearly to levels that make drilling in the Marcellus Shale unprofitable, according to a Penn State educator, but drillers have been hedging their prices and the Northeast is still the best-paying gas market.

Freefalling from a high in 2008 of around $14 per thousand cubic feet, prices are currently around $4 per thousand cubic feet, hovering just above the $3.75 threshold that companies believe makes Marcellus Shale drilling unprofitable, said Tom Murphy, an educator with the Lycoming County Penn State Cooperative Extension. He spoke on Tuesday at a public-education meeting sponsored by the Lackawanna Heritage Valley Authority at the Steamtown National Historic Site.

But many companies hedged their gas sales months ago at around $9 per thousand cubic feet, he said, and because much of the Northeast uses natural gas for home heating, Pennsylvania isn’t seeing the same reduction in drilling rigs as other shale drilling areas.

“The proximity of that (the Marcellus Shale) is what a lot of this is about,” Murphy said. “They are leasing right now, but they’re leasing for a lot less than they were before. … It’s not a matter of is this coming. It’s a matter of how big is this going to be.”

Companies are mostly leasing strategically to fill in holes in drilling units while slowing production to reduce supply and increase prices, he said. But the usual three-month to six-month falloff between reduced production and reduced supply isn’t occurring. “There’s so much gas coming out of these shales, and the Marcellus Shale is one of those, that the lag time is nine to 12 months,” Murphy said.

Still, the “weakest link” in the industry is dealing with contaminated wastewater, he said. While there are eight deep-injection wells in the state, only one is available for industry use, and it’s in the southwestern part of the state.

The vast majority of the water is being treated at municipal sewage facilities. There, the heavy metals are removed, and the brine is simply diluted and dumped into waterways in the Susquehanna River watershed.

“It’s actually starting to get to the point where it’s starting to exceed what can be put in” the watershed, Murphy said.

Another water issue is managing pollution at the drilling site, said Jim Garner, the Susquehanna Conservation District manager. “They talk about restoration; they like to do restoration,” he said, displaying a photograph of sediment fencing at a site that had been compromised by runoff. “In practice, it’s a different situation. … We’ve only seen several sites fully restored. It can be pretty challenging.”

As the drilling ramps up, hundreds of trucks will be driving over Susquehanna County’s many dirt roads, he said. The unstable roads combined with the county’s many waterways create 2,712 potential pollution sites, he said. “In a few weeks, it’s really going to be interesting to see how these roads don’t hold up,” he said.

Garner’s district has approved only one erosion and sedimentation plan and just two others have been submitted, he said. All the activity and unresolved concerns have created a swirl of public speculation, he said. “I’ve been with the district 15 years. I have never heard anything create rumors like this.”

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader

Gas drillers’ access to Harveys Lake water doesn’t seem likely.

HARVEYS LAKE – The borough is girding itself against potential plans to use lake water for natural-gas drilling, but the state Department of Environmental Protection thinks attempting to gain access to the water might be more trouble than it’s worth.

At its recent monthly meeting, borough council had solicitor Charles McCormick write to the Susquehanna River Basin Commission noting in the letter that the council “strongly opposes &hellip any consumptive use of water from the tributary system of Harveys Lake.”

Council became concerned after receiving a phone call and a notice. The notice was of Chesapeake Energy’s request to increase its one-day water-removal limit from the basin to 20 million gallons, and the phone call was from an engineering firm representing a gas company.

Brent Ramsey, an environmental scientist with Harrisburg-based international engineering consulting firm Gannett Fleming, had asked who owned the water rights at the lake and if the water could be procured for a well-drilling client, borough secretary Susan Sutton said.

He also called the borough’s Environmental Advisory Council asking similar questions, EAC secretary Denise Sult said.

Ramsey said the client directed that the operation be kept confidential, but acknowledged that his company’s involvement is in securing water-use permitting and that approval for a source of water hasn’t yet been secured. He refused to comment on whether the lake was still a target or if other sources were being sought.

Tapping the lake’s resources might prove difficult, however, said DEP spokesman Mark Carmon. “There’s been a long-standing question mark about who owns the bottom of the lake,” he said. “It’s probably a lot more complicated that it’s worth, in a legal sense, for anybody.”

He said the borough doesn’t own the water and individual lakefront landowners would have to be contacted. Deeds would have to be checked for exact descriptions of how far out into the water each property border protrudes. Any user-landowner agreement would still need to get SRBC approval “and face the wrath of the neighbors on each side of them,” he said.

“We think that’s the way it would play out,” he said.

He said that he wasn’t aware of any proposals or approvals of water usage in Luzerne County for gas drilling.

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader

Senate hearing set for today at Misericordia, symposium Wednesday at Woodlands.

While landowners are imagining the gobs of cash they stand to make from natural-gas drilling in the Marcellus Shale rock layer underlying much of the region, Don Young hopes there’s room to imagine a few other images, such as gas pipelines crisscrossing once-pristine farmland, benzene contaminating groundwater supplies and an industrywide press to tap every inch of lucrative ground.

And that doesn’t include the Fort Worth, Texas, resident’s concerns about the psychological effects of celebrity-fronted publicity campaigns linking the drilling to patriotism and national security. “It’s Orwellian to see it happening here,” he said. “You’ve got American flags on each well.”

But the leader of Fort Worth Citizens Against Neighborhood Drilling Ordinance hopes the travails that now plague his home above the Barnett Shale are averted in the similar Marcellus Shale. “What you have here in Fort Worth on a grand scale is apathy. People felt, ‘We can’t stop it. It’s too big. It’s big oil,’ ” he explained. “The average busy person, they don’t have time to worry about gas drilling. … They have families, they have lives, they’re struggling, and if you have a few companies handing out money saying, ‘Here’s some money, just forget about it,’ ” they’ll do just that, he said.

Local regulators and educators are already taking steps to avoid those effects, and they’ll take a few more this week. This afternoon, the state Senate Republican’s Policy Committee will meet at Misericordia University to hear testimony from people familiar with dealings in the Barnett Shale on the potential effects awaiting Pennsylvania.

Several of the same speakers will be featured in discussions Wednesday morning at the Woodlands Inn & Resort in Plains Township, as the Joint Urban Studies Center holds a Marcellus Shale Symposium. The public is invited to either presentation, but the symposium has a registration fee.

“We are front and center to the development of this new industry,” said state Sen. Lisa Baker, R-Lehman Township, who requested the hearing. “I think having the hearing here demonstrates, in my judgment, that we’re doing all we can to ensure that our laws and regulations are appropriate and that if we need to make changes,” the legislature is ready to do so.

She said she hopes to get answers to questions she often hears from constituents, including potential downsides to drilling and whether current regulations are enough to curtail them.

According to several of the speakers, Pennsylvania might have a lot of ground to make up before it’s running even with the industry. “I just don’t understand the state’s set-up. Why wouldn’t that be a requirement to disclose how well the wells (are performing)?” asked John Baen, a University of North Texas professor and real-estate expert who has 250 wells on his property in the Barnett Shale. “If it’s all proprietary, then how do we know what the true wealth is?”

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader

Expert advises landowners to have groundwater tested before gas drilling begins.

In the rush to sign leases to drill for natural gas, some fear that dollar signs might blur landowners’ considerations of other important issues, like protecting groundwater.

But landowners are unlikely to notice most major threats to water quality, and the problems they do notice, according to Bryan Swistock, a water specialist with Penn State University, have more to do with landowner oversights than driller mistakes.

“Most of the real health concerns in water you wouldn’t even notice,” he said. “The vast majority of the complaints turn out to be something else (other than contamination from drilling), so it’s really important that people take a look at their water supply and make sure they’re not causing their own problems.”

He noted that problems often occur from faulty residential wells or other outside factors, but landowners attribute it to the drilling. Natural gas drilling sites are cropping up in the region as companies rush to tap the Marcellus shale, a layer of rock about a mile below the surface that industry experts believe is trapping billions of dollars in natural gas.

Swistock, who has done most of his research with shallow wells in western Pennsylvania instead of the deep shale wells, stressed the importance of getting water tested for a baseline before giving drillers the green light. “It’s very difficult to show that anything’s been done to your water unless you can show it was good before,” he said.

He suggested watching for sedimentation, particularly due to construction and ground disturbance, as well as metals like barium and iron showing up in groundwater.

“It’s not common, but it can happen from time to time,” he said. “If it’s going to happen, most likely it’s going to happen right around the gas well.”

Just as important are concerns over the quantity of water used, where it comes from and where it goes. The innovative horizontal drilling method used to tap the shale requires millions of gallons of water, and industry watchers like Swistock are concerned that the region lacks the treatment facilities necessary to process the tainted water that results.

In an attempt to educate landowners about these water issues, Swistock has been holding seminars through the Penn State Cooperative Extension. One is scheduled for 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. Oct. 14 at Lake-Lehman High School.

“It’s funny. You can pretty much divide the people who attend these things into two groups,” Swistock said. Those who stand to profit off the drilling generally attend but don’t get too agitated, he said. Those who won’t profit but stand to be affected by any problems do get agitated. “It’s a natural reaction. If you’re going to make money from something you’re more willing to put up with it.”

Still, Swistock noted, with all the problems, the problems with natural gas drilling are a far cry from those associated with past energy extraction activities in this region. “It certainly pales in comparison to coal mining,” he said.

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader

But experts say that doesn’t mean drillers won’t eventually explore here.

None of the 73 permits the state Department of Environmental Protection issued Wednesday for natural gas wells in the Marcellus Shale was in Luzerne County.

That doesn’t necessarily mean drillers aren’t interested in looking for gas here, experts say. But a combination of factors may slow activity compared to other parts of the state.

“I’m sure it’s still in the mix,” said Stephen Rhoads, president of the Pennsylvania Oil & Gas Association. “The work in trying to explore and analyze for natural gas in the Marcellus Shale in the region … is only beginning in the northeast” region of Pennsylvania.

Energy companies and geologists have estimated for decades that billions of dollars worth of natural gas is locked in a layer of rock called Marcellus Shale that runs about a mile underground from upstate New York down to Virginia, including through the northern tier of Pennsylvania. Only recently have technological advances and higher energy prices made extracting the gas financially feasible.

Western Pennsylvania has much more drilling infrastructure, such as wastewater treatment facilities, than this region, Rhoads said, which explains why the majority of the permits issued on Wednesday were for western counties.

He also attributed the companies’ deliberate pace to budgetary constraints, a lack of drilling rigs and an incomplete grasp of the geology.

“It takes a lot of time and money to understand what lies more than a mile underground,” he said. “These companies are investing a lot … to make sure they get it right.”

While some properties have been leased in the northwestern section of Luzerne County, Mark Carmon, regional DEP spokesman, said there are no drilling permits in the county. He was unaware of any awaiting approval, either, but cautioned that doesn’t mean county landowners have missed the windfall.

All the assurances don’t make the waiting any more palatable for landowners.

“It’s pretty frustrating,” said Jack Zucosky, whose Luzerne County Landowners group is looking to get its more than 6,000 acres leased. “We’ve been close a few times with a few companies, but nothing definite yet.”

He’s confident Luzerne County property will get leased, but not until next year at the earliest.

“I really think what’s going on here is natural gas (prices) dropped a lot, and these companies are having cash flow problems,” he said. “It’s a waiting game right now.”

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader

Revenue from tax on underground resources seen as windfall, but bill would need more support to pass.

Local municipalities could tap into the potential natural gas drilling windfall if state lawmakers are able to push through legislation that’s been stalled for more than a year.

House Bill 1373 would amend the state General County Assessment Law to explicitly make underground resources such as natural gas and oil subject to real estate assessment and taxation. The bill would require gas companies to pay taxes on the resources they extract, but wouldn’t add any tax burden to landowners.

“We’re concerned about these companies coming in and sucking up huge profits at the expense of citizens of Pennsylvania,” said state Rep. Eddie Pashinski, D-Wilkes-Barre, who is a co-sponsor of the bill.

Introduced in May 2007 by House Majority Leader Bill DeWeese, the bill was drafted in reaction to a state Supreme Court decision that ruled taxing those resources wasn’t specifically enumerated in the law. The amendment would preempt that ruling by making taxation of those resources part of the law.

Tom Andrews, DeWeese’s press secretary, said the push for the bill came from DeWeese’s constituent municipalities in western Pennsylvania, which had been relying on revenue from the resource taxes for years before it was shut off by the court decision.

However, the bill has been stalled in the House Finance Committee since May 2007, and sentiment among supporters is that state Senate Republicans, on principle, won’t support a tax bill.

“At this point, I don’t think it has the support to pass in the House, pass in the Senate and be signed by the governor, so that’s why we’ve held off on pushing it out of the House,” Andrews said.

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader

Gas-drilling leases negotiated in Wyoming County, not coming as quickly here.

TUNKHANNOCK – While Wyoming County landowners are heavily involved in the regional natural-gas boom, almost all Luzerne County landowners are out of luck, at least for now.

“It’s not always fun. There’s going to be some angst, there’s going to be some anxiety,” said Jack Sordoni, who heads Wilkes-Barre-based Homeland Energy Ventures LLC.

Energy companies and geologists have estimated for decades that billions of dollars of natural gas is locked in a layer of rock called Marcellus Shale that runs about a mile underground from upstate New York down to Virginia, including the northern tier of Pennsylvania. Only recently have technological advances and higher energy prices made extracting the gas financially feasible.

Speaking during a meeting Wednesday evening at the Tunkhannock Area High School, the Harveys Lake native said oil companies aren’t yet interested in crossing the county border. He said his family’s land in Wyoming County has been leased, but companies have refused to consider contiguous land across the county line.

However, Chris Robinson, who is brokering leases in Wyoming County for nearly $3,000 per acre and 17 percent royalties, said he’s already leased the western edge of Fairmount Township in northwestern Luzerne County.

Sordoni added that Dallas, Lake and Franklin townships are areas “Chris and I are hearing (about) repeatedly” and are “still very much prospective and in play.”

Luzerne County landowners anxiously awaiting a lease offer probably won’t have to wait long for an answer. Robinson, who’s from Allegheny County, said he planned to continue negotiating leases in the area until the gas companies are no longer interested.

“I don’t think it’s going to take that long. It’s measured in months at most,” he said.

The wait might, however, offer local landowners examples to consider. Unlike other land groups, the Wyoming landowners rolled all their concerns into the lease instead of adding addendums.

“The difference is this is our lease. This is about us,” said Chip Lions, a member of the group who’s now doing lease work.

The meeting was sponsored by Stone House Wealth Management LLC, a Montrose-based financial planning firm that’s advising landowners and selling them investment portfolios. The company, which started the www.nepagas.com Web site, got involved a while ago “because we saw where this was going to go,” said John Burke, an investment adviser with the company.

The good news, Robinson said, is that he can get leases for any property within the companies’ interested regions, no matter the size.

“I can’t tell you how many I’ve signed for 1 acre or less,” he said.

Additionally, he said that while some gas companies might honestly stop leasing, other companies new to the area desperately want in on the drilling rights. And, he said, they can check for clear land titles within five days, contrary to the three months they tell most land groups.

For landowners concerned about environmental problems, he said state agencies are good at watching drillers, noting his own enforcement experiences.

He warned, however, to not go it alone.

“The mass of ground gets people the best deal, period,” he said. “People who break away, you may be penalized and you may be penalizing your neighbors.”

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader

Topics like reporting leasing income, transferring leases to beneficiaries to be covered.

The temptation to just sign could seem irresistible. With a few strokes of the pen, some people in the region are being offered the chance to completely change their lives with natural gas leases.

But first, they’re warned, make peace with the fact that the next person will get more. Check the maps, they’re told, check the deed, hire a lawyer, test the water. How much environmental damage is acceptable? How about hassles to daily life?

For those not involved, think Beverly Hillbillies, minus that improbable shot, and then exchange the endearing high jinks for hours of tedious title searching, legal work and stressful decisions with lifelong implications.

So who could blame anyone for simply signing and hiding behind the wads of cash? Well, their children, for one. Because with the great benefits of gas royalties come the great responsibilities of taxation and profit allocation, and, if they’re ignored, the great headaches of the judicial system and familial infighting.

“People are just seeing the (money) as a way to pay taxes … and not thinking about having to report it to the IRS and the tax implications that could have on them … or thinking about general financial planning or investing,” wrote Donna Skog Grey in an e-mail.

Grey, who works for the Penn State Cooperative Extension in Luzerne County, says the extension has been fielding questions on gas leases, environmental issues and lessee rights. What to do with the money, however, hasn’t come up often, she noted, which is why the extension is sponsoring workshops on what to do after the lease is signed but before the money rolls in.

One is planned for Lake-Lehman Junior/Senior High School on Aug. 25.

“There may be some strategies available to reduce the income tax,” said Dale Tice, an attorney with Greevy & Associates, a Williamsport law firm consulting on gas leases. “That’s something they would want to work out with their accountant or financial advisor prior to receiving the payment.”

The workshop will cover various topics, including how to report leasing income – the cash bonuses are just like regular income – transferring leases to beneficiaries and investment options.

“Certainly the cash-bonus payment is an issue,” Tice said. “It could push somebody up into a higher tax bracket. … You’re looking at a large potential tax hit, and without using the strategies that are available, you’ve got issues (in the event of) divorce, creditors.”

To add to confusion, there are health-care implications with elderly lessees who are currently eligible for Medicare or Medicaid, he said.

He noted some families are creating limited-liability companies to distribute the proceeds, and that family limited partnerships can make dividing up ownership of the lease similar to issuing stock.

“Really, the issue here is providing governance, keeping the parents in control of the resource while they’re alive, but at the same time providing for an orderly and easy shift of equity to the next generation,” Tice said. “I don’t think that you have to have it necessarily worked out before you receive your cash-bonus payment, but certainly there’s no disadvantage to thinking about these issues earlier rather than later.”

If you go

A natural gas-leasing workshop entitled “Managing Natural Gas Lease and Royalty Income” is scheduled for 7 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. Monday, Aug. 25 at the Lake-Lehman Junior/Senior High School. The cost is $10 per person. To make reservations, call the Penn State Cooperative Extension at 1-888-825-1701.

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader

Lucrative leasing deals are possible for area residents. Negatives: Noise, pollution.

The opportunity won’t come to most Northeastern Pennsylvania landowners, but those offered a natural-gas well will face life-changing effects, both positive and negative.

“It’s going to transform Pennsylvania, there’s no doubt about it,” said Ken Balliet, a Penn State Cooperative Extension director well-versed in gas-lease issues. “This whole Marcellus shale play is highly speculative” for the gas companies, he said, because it’s not very well studied, but landowners who land lucrative deals will see it otherwise. “When you hand someone a check for half a million dollars, that’s not very speculative.”

Add to that well-siting and annual royalty payments, and suddenly the problem becomes trying to find tax havens for the profits.

The tradeoff, however, is an unexpected and sometimes unwelcome bustling of activity — trucks, noise and pollution. Many of the changes will come and go, but some – like a clear-cut well site or a noisy compression station – will remain for decades.

It’s a sacrifice Jerry Riaubia is willing to make on his 16 acres in Sweet Valley – if the right number is on the checks and they keep coming. “If I had an income for my family, it would be well worth it,” he said. “We could help the economy out if we had that money. It could save our economy.”

For many rural landowners, the offers are difficult to pass up. Reports of leases offered at $2,500 per acre are common as close as Wyoming County, and companies have increased production royalties from the state-mandated 12.5 percent to 18 percent as owners become more educated.

Even with just his 16 acres in a standard 600-acre drilling unit, and estimating modest gas extraction at 18 percent royalties on a single well, Riaubia stands to pocket around $117,000 over the well’s lifetime, according to www.pagaslease.com, a Web site run by landowners who were approached early on about leasing.

That’s only the profits from a single well, and far more than one can exist at a site. “We heard of one company had drilled 27 on one pad,” said Tom Murphy, a Penn State Cooperative Extension educator.

And as oil prices increase, so will natural gas prices, according to a 2005 report by the Schlumberger oil and gas company. “The price of gas is linked to oil and based on each fuel’s heating value,” the report notes. “As long as oil prices remain high, there is no reason for natural gas prices to go down. Although gas is abundant in much of the world, it is expensive and potentially dangerous to transport internationally.”

That financial windfall might be just a pipedream for Luzerne County residents, though.

Chesapeake Energy Corp., one of the largest leaseholders in the Marcellus play, isn’t leasing in the county, according to Matt Sheppard, the company’s director of corporate development. A single listing exists for Luzerne County on the gas lease Web site’s lease tracker. Signed in late May, the five-year offer was $1,500 per acre with 15 percent royalties.

While Riaubia said he hasn’t been approached by any companies, land groups in northern municipalities in the county, such as Franklin Township, have been negotiating. Rod McGuirk, who owns 56 acres in the township, said owners there have been offered $1,800 per acre. “They’re just preliminary offers, but we’re excited,” he said.

That excitement could quickly wane if problems crop up or owners are unprepared for the realities of drilling. Unlike other unconventional gas sources, shale wells produce consistently over three decades, so well sites are more or less permanent. Even after sites are reclaimed, some infrastructure is left behind.

Also, because gas is transported nationally through lines that are more compressed than regional distribution lines, noisy compression stations will need to be installed in what are otherwise bucolically quiet locales.

Then there’s the potential to unearth radioactive materials, acid-producing minerals and deplete water resources. In fact, after concerns arose about the amount of water necessary to drill a well, the state Department of Environmental Protection included an addendum to its drilling permit that addresses water usage and is specific to Marcellus shale.

Still, officials assure that regulatory agencies are keeping tabs on drillers. “There’s an awful lot of eyes watching the streams up there,” DEP spokesman Tom Rathbun said. “So these guys aren’t just going to be able to dump stuff. … If they start killing streams, a lot of people are going to find out quickly.”

And aside from that, he said, the financials force the industry to regulate itself. “The Marcellus shale is not really a business for fly-by-nighters,” he said. “You don’t throw $10 million away because you were cutting corners on an environmental regulation. Now that they know we’re watching … there’s too much money on the line for these guys to do stupid mistakes or to cut corners.”

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader