Posts Tagged ‘spokesman’

MARC LEVY Associated Press Writer

HARRISBURG— Citing three recent chemical spills at one well site, Pennsylvania regulators said Friday they had ordered Cabot Oil and Gas Corp. to halt its use of a drilling technique that uses liquids to fracture rock and release natural gas.

The state Department of Environmental Protection’s order applies to eight of Cabot’s drilling sites, all in Susquehanna County in northeastern Pennsylvania.

The company, which received the order Thursday, voluntarily shut down its use of the drilling technique — called hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking” — at the spill-plagued site there earlier this week. It has seven other drilling sites that eventually will require fracking to complete.

“The department took this action because of our concern about Cabot’s current fracking process and to ensure that the environment in Susquehanna County is properly protected,” the DEP’s northcentral regional director, Robert Yowell, said in a statement.

Under the state’s order, Cabot must complete a number of engineering and safety tasks before it can resume its fracking process as it drills into the potentially lucrative Marcellus Shale formation.

Cabot spokesman Ken Komoroski said Friday that the company disagrees with some of the agency’s allegations in the order, but it is committed to completing the tasks required by the order.

Copyright: Times Leader

The initial events polluted a wetland and caused a fish kill in Susquehanna County.

By Rory Sweeneyrsweeney@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

Cabot Oil and Gas has been issued a letter of violation for two liquid-gel spills last week at the company’s Heitsman natural-gas well pad in Susquehanna County, the state Department of Environmental Protection announced on Tuesday.

The spills of about 8,400 gallons, which polluted a wetland and caused a fish kill in Stevens Creek, were followed up by a third spill at the site on Tuesday morning, according to DEP spokesman Dan Spadoni.

A hose burst, according to DEP, and released about 420 gallons of the same lubricant. A catch basin retained most of it, Cabot spokesman Ken Komoroski said, but it’s unknown what happened to 10 gallons.

He said he was unaware of the spills causing any environmental damage, but acknowledged that a dam created to block the contaminant caused flow problems and that DEP noticed “the minnows downstream were distressed and/or swimming erratically.”

“We think that it’s important to residents that no contaminants from the spill have compromised Stevens Creek,” he said.

The spilled material, known as LGC-35, suspends sand in water to fracture rock in the gas-drilling process used in the Marcellus Shale region.

LGC-35 is a “potential carcinogen,” according to its Material Safety Data Sheet, and can cause eye, skin and respiratory irritation, along with “central nervous system effects,” such as dizziness and headaches.

Komoroski said the drilling contractor, Halliburton, has since revised the safety sheet to exclude the carcinogenic reference because the potential cancer-causing agent is a “potential contaminant” to the gel, not part of its formula. Halliburton told Cabot the contaminant wasn’t present in the spilled batches, but Cabot is performing its own testing to confirm that, Komoroski said.

He added that Cabot feels Halliburton should have been cited for the spill. Halliburton had flushed the wetlands with clean water and collected the effluent before the third spill, Spadoni said, and it won’t be known whether the land needs to be excavated until results from soil samples are announced. “I would anticipate that would be done fairly soon,” Spadoni said.

Cabot has 10 days to respond to the violation notice with how it plans to further clean the affected area and prevent future spills. DEP may assess a civil penalty in the case, for which Komoroski said Cabot would seek compensation from Halliburton.

Copyright: Times Leader

By Rory Sweeneyrsweeney@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

About 8,400 gallons of a gel used in drilling natural-gas wells was spilled on Wednesday at a well being drilled in Dimock Township for Cabot Oil & Gas, the state Department of Environmental Protection announced Thursday.

Spilled at the Heitsman well site, the substance affected an unknown amount of “shallow wetland,” said company spokesman Ken Komoroski.

DEP and state Fish and Boat Commission officials were on hand Wednesday and Thursday as a crew cleaned up and contained the material, said DEP spokesman Mark Carmon. It may have gotten into Stevens Creek, he said.

“What was done was the spilled material was immediately contained” using an eight-man crew, Komoroski said. “The gel was able to be removed by vacuum trucks.”

The spill occurred as Halliburton was using a fluid to fracture the Marcellus Shale and release the natural gas within it, he said. Baker Tank, the contractor responsible for tanking and piping for the “frack” job, allowed a pipe to come loose and release the gel, he said.

“This is certainly disappointing to Cabot that this occurred,” Komoroski said. “On the other hand, these are the types of things that are typically unforeseeable and it’s important to react to it when it occurs.”

The slippery substance is “relatively innocuous,” he said, but “does have the potential for eye, skin and respiratory irritation.” Used to help suspend sand particles evenly throughout the so-called fracking fluid, it’s made of “paraffinic material” and polysaccharides, or something like fluid wax and starch.

Copyright: Times Leader

Firm accused of causing gas infiltration, but it’s unclear if rules knowingly violated.

By Rory Sweeneyrsweeney@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. caused natural gas to infiltrate into at least nine homes in Susquehanna County, according a letter of violation from the state Department of Environmental Protection, but it remains unclear whether Cabot knowingly violated any regulations.

“The more important part of the investigation is still ahead of us,” DEP spokesman Mark Carmon said. “We know where it came from. The two more important things are how did it get there … and more importantly, how do we get it out of the wells.”

The company, however, is not confident in DEP’s findings, according to spokesman Ken Komoroski, believing the letter is “unnecessary” and claims as fact conclusions that haven’t been proven.

The situation has become an example of a statewide issue regarding the unknown consequences of gas drilling. Water contamination concerns have caused environmental agencies, including DEP and the Susquehanna River Basic Commission, to increase their regulation and oversight, hindering drillers’ efforts to secure permits quickly.

The letter cites Cabot for an “unpermitted discharge of natural gas” into state waters, for failure to prevent the discharge and failure to submit certain records on time. Though no financial punishment has been levied, Cabot was told to install gas detectors in nine homes where methane was detected in water wells and to continue providing water to four of those where there’s a safety threat from gas buildup, Carmon said.

“It’s disappointing to have a letter which is, at best, premature directed to the company that it violated environmental standards when that conclusion hasn’t been reached yet,” Komoroski said. “We’re hopeful, and I stress hopeful, that our hydrogeologist will actually be able to determine what caused the natural gas to be in the water. We don’t know that we’ll be able to do that.”

Cabot hit a bump on Jan. 1 in its exploration for natural gas in the Marcellus Shale when the cap exploded off a private water well near one of the company’s drilling sites.

While drilling hasn’t come to Luzerne County yet, companies have expressed interest in properties along its northern border. Fairmount Township Supervisor David Keller said several properties have been leased for years, and hundreds of acres, including his 90, were scheduled to be leased before the economic recession hit the industry. “The economy fell apart before they got the money to us,” he said.

The company and DEP agree that the gas isn’t from Marcellus Shale, a pipeline leak or naturally occurring sources above ground. They also concur that the gas is likely from a gas-laden upper layer of underground Devonian shale, of which the Marcellus Shale is a component but thousands of feet deeper, Carmon said. Marcellus Shale is generally at least 5,000 feet underground, while DEP determined the gas contaminating the water wells came from a shale layer roughly between 1,500 feet and 2,000 feet deep, Carmon said.

The company has cemented the upper Devonian shale layers of several wells, effectively extending the cement seals from the bottom of the water-bearing region, where the seals usually stop, to the bottom of the upper shale layers. The department has been trying to isolate the exact source of gas, seeing whether the extended seals produce a drop in water-contamination levels, Carmon said.

Because the method of contamination hasn’t been determined, Carmon said it’s too early to tell if Cabot knowingly violated regulations. “I’m not aware of anything blatant or anything like that, but, again, we want to know how did it happen,” he said.

Komoroski said the company is concerned about the effect the letter will have on its public image, particularly since it questions many of the department’s conclusions. It believes it filed all drilling reports on time, and that the gas detectors aren’t necessary. In fact, Komoroski said, the product DEP suggested Cabot buy wasn’t even a gas detector.

Cabot plans to meet DEP’s deadline for a response and is also scheduling an in-person meeting, as requested.

Copyright: Times Leader

Gas drillers’ access to Harveys Lake water doesn’t seem likely.

HARVEYS LAKE – The borough is girding itself against potential plans to use lake water for natural-gas drilling, but the state Department of Environmental Protection thinks attempting to gain access to the water might be more trouble than it’s worth.

At its recent monthly meeting, borough council had solicitor Charles McCormick write to the Susquehanna River Basin Commission noting in the letter that the council “strongly opposes &hellip any consumptive use of water from the tributary system of Harveys Lake.”

Council became concerned after receiving a phone call and a notice. The notice was of Chesapeake Energy’s request to increase its one-day water-removal limit from the basin to 20 million gallons, and the phone call was from an engineering firm representing a gas company.

Brent Ramsey, an environmental scientist with Harrisburg-based international engineering consulting firm Gannett Fleming, had asked who owned the water rights at the lake and if the water could be procured for a well-drilling client, borough secretary Susan Sutton said.

He also called the borough’s Environmental Advisory Council asking similar questions, EAC secretary Denise Sult said.

Ramsey said the client directed that the operation be kept confidential, but acknowledged that his company’s involvement is in securing water-use permitting and that approval for a source of water hasn’t yet been secured. He refused to comment on whether the lake was still a target or if other sources were being sought.

Tapping the lake’s resources might prove difficult, however, said DEP spokesman Mark Carmon. “There’s been a long-standing question mark about who owns the bottom of the lake,” he said. “It’s probably a lot more complicated that it’s worth, in a legal sense, for anybody.”

He said the borough doesn’t own the water and individual lakefront landowners would have to be contacted. Deeds would have to be checked for exact descriptions of how far out into the water each property border protrudes. Any user-landowner agreement would still need to get SRBC approval “and face the wrath of the neighbors on each side of them,” he said.

“We think that’s the way it would play out,” he said.

He said that he wasn’t aware of any proposals or approvals of water usage in Luzerne County for gas drilling.

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader

Insiders say price declines and credit issues are limiting lease bids and bonus payment offers.

The natural-gas windfall seems to have dried up – at least for now.

Commodity price declines, disappearing credit worthiness and companies transitioning to produce gas from the lands they’ve leased have combined to limit lease bids and reduce bonus payment offers.

“Not only are we noticing it, there’s no argument that’s not happening,” said Jack Sordoni, who owns the Wilkes-Barre-based fossil-fuel drilling company Homeland Energy Ventures LLC and is negotiating leases for local landowners.

Though he’s recently inked leases in Fairmount Township with $2,850 per acre up-front bonuses, he said he’s also recently had similar offers in the same area fall to $2,000 per acre. Other sources are reporting offers dropping back to pre-summer levels of several hundred dollars.

Part of the cause for the change, he noted, is that some large companies have dropped out of the leasing competition because prices have fallen and the credit crisis has hampered their ability to take on short-term debt.

“I would suspect, not being an economist, that they would have pretty far reaching” effects, he said. “The ones who are signing aren’t competing with as many players, so the prices aren’t going to be as high.”

The companies say the clock is ticking on beginning work on existing leases, so they’re focusing on filling out the gaps in the territories they’ve already locked up.

“We have moved from the lease acquisition phase to the development phase,” Chesapeake Energy spokesman Matt Sheppard wrote in an e-mail. “We are leasing strategically to support our existing leasehold.”

Sheppard said that for Chief Oil & Gas and many companies “it is more of a shift to moving dollars into drilling and development” instead of continuing to build leasehold in unproven areas.

Chief Oil & Gas spokeswoman Kristi Gittins wrote in an e-mail: “A lot of acreage has been leased. As drilling begins and areas prove out, leasing should pick up.”

Sordoni said that in the business “a lot of times we call that ‘going operational,’ and think for many of them, that’s true.”

With drilling and production increasing, natural gas prices have dropped about 50 percent in the past half year, he noted.

“This was a gold rush at the beginning. It was a frantic pace. Companies were scrambling. The pullback of the commodity prices has certainly led to a slowdown,” he said.

But there are some positive indications for unsigned properties. For example, companies have already shown indications of ramping up production in the region.

Gittins said Chief will soon have four rigs in the region, including one made specially for maneuvering in the hilly Appalachian region, and two more by early 2009.

First, the gas isn’t going anywhere. Horizontal drilling only allows vertical fracturing of rock, and it’s illegal to drill beyond the leased boundaries. So the rule of capture – which allows gas or oil to be collected from a rock fracture that crosses a lease boundary – doesn’t apply.

Secondly, companies have already shown indications of ramping up production in the region.

Gittins said Chief will soon have four rigs in the region, including one made specially for maneuvering in the hilly Appalachian region, and two more by early 2009.

Chesapeake is predicting it will need much more water for its drilling operations before the 2012 expiration of its current permit with the Susquehanna River Basin Commission. While the company isn’t asking to change its permit to withdraw 5 million gallons daily from the river, it is asking to expand how much water it can use each day from 5 million gallons to roughly 20 million gallons.

Copyright: Times Leader

Companies now are focusing on drilling land that’s already been leased, industry experts say.

The natural-gas windfall seems to have dried up – at least for now.

Commodity price declines, disappearing credit worthiness and companies transitioning to produce gas from the lands they’ve leased have combined to limit lease bids and reduce bonus payment offers.

“Not only are we noticing it, there’s no argument that’s not happening,” said Jack Sordoni, who owns the Wilkes-Barre-based fossil-fuel drilling company Homeland Energy Ventures LLC and is negotiating leases for local landowners.

Though he’s recently inked leases in Fairmount Township with $2,850 per acre up-front bonuses, he said he’s also had this week similar offers in the same area fall to $2,000 per acre. Other sources are reporting offers dropping back to pre-summer levels of several hundred dollars.

Part of the cause for the change, he noted, is that some large companies have dropped out of the leasing competition because prices have fallen and the credit crisis has hampered their ability to take on short-term debt.

“I would suspect, not being an economist, that they would have pretty far reaching” effects, he said. “The ones who are signing aren’t competing with as many players, so the prices aren’t going to be as high.”

The companies say the clock is ticking on beginning work on existing leases, so they’re focusing on filling out the gaps in the territories they’ve already locked up.

“We have moved from the lease acquisition phase to the development phase,” Chesapeake Energy spokesman Matt Sheppard wrote in an e-mail. “We are leasing strategically to support our existing leasehold.”

Sheppard said that for Chief Oil & Gas and many companies “it is more of a shift to moving dollars into drilling and development” instead of continuing to build leasehold in unproven areas.

Chief Oil & Gas spokeswoman Kristi Gittins wrote in an e-mail: “A lot of acreage has been leased. As drilling begins and areas prove out, leasing should pick up.”

With drilling and production increasing, natural gas prices have dropped about 50 percent in the past half year, he noted.

“This was a gold rush at the beginning. It was a frantic pace. Companies were scrambling. The pullback of the commodity prices has certainly led to a slowdown,” he said.

But there are some positive indications for unsigned properties. For example, companies have already shown indications of ramping up production in the region.

Gittins said Chief will soon have four rigs in the region, including one made specially for maneuvering in the hilly Appalachian region, and two more by early 2009.

With drilling and production increasing, natural gas prices have dropped about 50 percent in the past half year.

Copyright: Times Leader

But experts say that doesn’t mean drillers won’t eventually explore here.

None of the 73 permits the state Department of Environmental Protection issued Wednesday for natural gas wells in the Marcellus Shale was in Luzerne County.

That doesn’t necessarily mean drillers aren’t interested in looking for gas here, experts say. But a combination of factors may slow activity compared to other parts of the state.

“I’m sure it’s still in the mix,” said Stephen Rhoads, president of the Pennsylvania Oil & Gas Association. “The work in trying to explore and analyze for natural gas in the Marcellus Shale in the region … is only beginning in the northeast” region of Pennsylvania.

Energy companies and geologists have estimated for decades that billions of dollars worth of natural gas is locked in a layer of rock called Marcellus Shale that runs about a mile underground from upstate New York down to Virginia, including through the northern tier of Pennsylvania. Only recently have technological advances and higher energy prices made extracting the gas financially feasible.

Western Pennsylvania has much more drilling infrastructure, such as wastewater treatment facilities, than this region, Rhoads said, which explains why the majority of the permits issued on Wednesday were for western counties.

He also attributed the companies’ deliberate pace to budgetary constraints, a lack of drilling rigs and an incomplete grasp of the geology.

“It takes a lot of time and money to understand what lies more than a mile underground,” he said. “These companies are investing a lot … to make sure they get it right.”

While some properties have been leased in the northwestern section of Luzerne County, Mark Carmon, regional DEP spokesman, said there are no drilling permits in the county. He was unaware of any awaiting approval, either, but cautioned that doesn’t mean county landowners have missed the windfall.

All the assurances don’t make the waiting any more palatable for landowners.

“It’s pretty frustrating,” said Jack Zucosky, whose Luzerne County Landowners group is looking to get its more than 6,000 acres leased. “We’ve been close a few times with a few companies, but nothing definite yet.”

He’s confident Luzerne County property will get leased, but not until next year at the earliest.

“I really think what’s going on here is natural gas (prices) dropped a lot, and these companies are having cash flow problems,” he said. “It’s a waiting game right now.”

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader

In addition to anticipated jobs and profits from natural-gas drilling, water usage should increase as regional operations get under way.

That could mean more income for water haulers and sanitary authorities.

Drilling companies have been ramping up activities because an underground rock layer known as Marcellus Shale is expected to contain billions of dollars in natural gas deposits.

Each well-drilling operation could require up to 1 million gallons of water. While the water can be reused, it eventually must be disposed of at a treatment facility.

The Wyoming Valley Sanitary Authority hasn’t accepted any well-drilling wastewater, but it is interested.

“If it’s not hazardous to our plant, and if DEP approves us as a disposal site, we would consider it,” executive director Fred DeSanto said.

The state Department of Environmental Protection recently sent a letter to sanitary authorities advising them that wastewater from the drilling can be harmful to certain treatment systems and cause them to violate their discharge permits. The water must be tested and approved by DEP.

Such contracts could be lucrative, but have potential problems. WVSA, the major wastewater treatment facility in Luzerne County, charges 3.5 cents per gallon for treatment of up to 2 million gallons and 3 cents for quantities beyond that.

That could help offset the estimated $6 million in upgrades the authority said it needs to meet Chesapeake Bay watershed agreement discharge standards.

That quick influx, however, creates a problem.

Sandy Bartosiewicz, WVSA’s financial and budget officer, said the authority has never been in a situation where it accepted “that amount of volume at one time.”

It will also have an impact on wastewater haulers.

“The volume of the material is significant,” said Chris Ravenscroft, president of Honesdale-based Koberlein Environmental Services. “I don’t think there’s any one company out there that has the capacity for the volume. … So I think there’s a large volume of work that will be generated.”

He said his company is actively seeking energy companies that are looking for haulers and treatment facilities. Gas companies are investigating drilling possibilities through the Marcellus region, which stretches from upstate New York through northern and western Pennsylvania, including the upper fringe of Luzerne County, and down into Virginia. Several wells have been drilled in this region, according to DEP spokesman Mark Carmon.

Cabot Oil & Gas Co. announced recently a well in Susquehanna County became its first to generate income.

Copyright: Times Leader

Lucrative leasing deals are possible for area residents. Negatives: Noise, pollution.

The opportunity won’t come to most Northeastern Pennsylvania landowners, but those offered a natural-gas well will face life-changing effects, both positive and negative.

“It’s going to transform Pennsylvania, there’s no doubt about it,” said Ken Balliet, a Penn State Cooperative Extension director well-versed in gas-lease issues. “This whole Marcellus shale play is highly speculative” for the gas companies, he said, because it’s not very well studied, but landowners who land lucrative deals will see it otherwise. “When you hand someone a check for half a million dollars, that’s not very speculative.”

Add to that well-siting and annual royalty payments, and suddenly the problem becomes trying to find tax havens for the profits.

The tradeoff, however, is an unexpected and sometimes unwelcome bustling of activity — trucks, noise and pollution. Many of the changes will come and go, but some – like a clear-cut well site or a noisy compression station – will remain for decades.

It’s a sacrifice Jerry Riaubia is willing to make on his 16 acres in Sweet Valley – if the right number is on the checks and they keep coming. “If I had an income for my family, it would be well worth it,” he said. “We could help the economy out if we had that money. It could save our economy.”

For many rural landowners, the offers are difficult to pass up. Reports of leases offered at $2,500 per acre are common as close as Wyoming County, and companies have increased production royalties from the state-mandated 12.5 percent to 18 percent as owners become more educated.

Even with just his 16 acres in a standard 600-acre drilling unit, and estimating modest gas extraction at 18 percent royalties on a single well, Riaubia stands to pocket around $117,000 over the well’s lifetime, according to www.pagaslease.com, a Web site run by landowners who were approached early on about leasing.

That’s only the profits from a single well, and far more than one can exist at a site. “We heard of one company had drilled 27 on one pad,” said Tom Murphy, a Penn State Cooperative Extension educator.

And as oil prices increase, so will natural gas prices, according to a 2005 report by the Schlumberger oil and gas company. “The price of gas is linked to oil and based on each fuel’s heating value,” the report notes. “As long as oil prices remain high, there is no reason for natural gas prices to go down. Although gas is abundant in much of the world, it is expensive and potentially dangerous to transport internationally.”

That financial windfall might be just a pipedream for Luzerne County residents, though.

Chesapeake Energy Corp., one of the largest leaseholders in the Marcellus play, isn’t leasing in the county, according to Matt Sheppard, the company’s director of corporate development. A single listing exists for Luzerne County on the gas lease Web site’s lease tracker. Signed in late May, the five-year offer was $1,500 per acre with 15 percent royalties.

While Riaubia said he hasn’t been approached by any companies, land groups in northern municipalities in the county, such as Franklin Township, have been negotiating. Rod McGuirk, who owns 56 acres in the township, said owners there have been offered $1,800 per acre. “They’re just preliminary offers, but we’re excited,” he said.

That excitement could quickly wane if problems crop up or owners are unprepared for the realities of drilling. Unlike other unconventional gas sources, shale wells produce consistently over three decades, so well sites are more or less permanent. Even after sites are reclaimed, some infrastructure is left behind.

Also, because gas is transported nationally through lines that are more compressed than regional distribution lines, noisy compression stations will need to be installed in what are otherwise bucolically quiet locales.

Then there’s the potential to unearth radioactive materials, acid-producing minerals and deplete water resources. In fact, after concerns arose about the amount of water necessary to drill a well, the state Department of Environmental Protection included an addendum to its drilling permit that addresses water usage and is specific to Marcellus shale.

Still, officials assure that regulatory agencies are keeping tabs on drillers. “There’s an awful lot of eyes watching the streams up there,” DEP spokesman Tom Rathbun said. “So these guys aren’t just going to be able to dump stuff. … If they start killing streams, a lot of people are going to find out quickly.”

And aside from that, he said, the financials force the industry to regulate itself. “The Marcellus shale is not really a business for fly-by-nighters,” he said. “You don’t throw $10 million away because you were cutting corners on an environmental regulation. Now that they know we’re watching … there’s too much money on the line for these guys to do stupid mistakes or to cut corners.”

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader