Posts Tagged ‘susquehanna river basin commission’

A Back Mountain workshop addresses potential problems with Marcellus Shale drilling.

By Steve Mocarskysmocarsky@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

LEHMAN TWP. – Back Mountain residents who attended a workshop on “Natural Gas Drilling and Drinking Water” on Thursday received a mini education on how to protect their wells from potential contamination by migrating natural gas as well as what two regulator agencies are doing to protect state waterways from the same potential threat.

Bryan Swistock, a water resources extension associate from the Penn State Cooperative Extension, presented an hour-long talk about natural gas exploration in the Marcellus Shale formation, how problems with drilling operations could potentially affect drinking water supplies, and what residents can and should do to protect them.

The program was hosted by the Cooperative Extension, state Sen. Lisa Baker, state Rep. Karen Boback, Back Mountain Community Partnership, the Susquehanna River Basin Commission and the state Department of Environmental Protection.

Swistock said about 41 percent of all private drinking water wells fail at least one water quality test, so it’s smart to test one’s well water regularly even without the threat of natural gas from drilling wells migrating into them.

Swistock said energy companies are required to test all water supplies within 1,000 feet of a drilling site before drilling so they have a baseline to compare test results if there is suspected contamination of a water supply by drilling activity. Some companies, such as EnCana Oil and Gas, which is poised to begin drilling in the Back Mountain in July, test wells within 1 mile of a drill site.

Swistock said residents should make sure the person collecting water samples works for a state-accredited lab. He said he’s talked to several people who told them the person who took samples was the same person who negotiated a land lease with them.

For folks who live outside the area in which the energy company pays for testing but want to play it safe, he said a full round of tests can cost up to $1,000. However, testing for the most common elements associated with Marcellus Shale drilling – methane, chloride, barium and total dissolved solids (TDS) – costs only about $150.

Indicators of water problems include foaming or bubbling water or spurting faucets, salty or metallic tastes, changes in water color or odor and reductions in water quantity or flow.

Also making presentations on Thursday were Michael McDonnell, a water quality specialist with DEP, and Tom Beauduy, deputy director and counsel for the Susquehanna River Basin Commission.

Copyright: Times Leader

PA American Water Co. to sample water from Huntsville Creek near natural gas well.

By Jerry Lynottjlynott@timesleader.com
Business Writer

A water company has begun inspecting a creek flowing from the Huntsville Reservoir as a result of a permit issued for a natural gas well in Lehman Township.

PA American Water Co. also will soon begin sampling water from Huntsville Creek, company spokesman Terry Maenza said Thursday.

The testing is to check whether drilling has affected the 1.9-billion- gallon reservoir that supplies drinking water to the utility’s customers. The reservoir is in the Back Mountain area of Luzerne County where more than 25,000 acres have been leased by companies planning to tap into the natural gas rich Marcellus Shale formation underground.

Technicians will go out once a week to take water samples, said Maenza, “so we have baseline data.”

Last month township officials approved a drilling permit for EnCana Gas & Oil USA Inc. It has partnered with Whitmar Exploration Co. to locate possible drilling sites within nine townships and Harveys Lake in the Back Mountain.

PA American has two reservoirs bordered by lease holdings. The 2.9 billion gallon Ceasetown Reservoir also is located in Lehman Township. In conjunction with Huntsville, Ceasetown supplies water to 100,000 people in the Wyoming Valley, Maenza said.

The reservoirs have 500-foot buffer zones around them where drilling is not permitted, he explained.

Maenza added that the water company relies on regulators and inspectors to enforce laws related to drilling and disposal and treatment of waste water used in the hydraulic fracturing or fracking, the high pressure injection of a mixture of water, chemicals and other materials to break up the rock containing the natural gas.

The utility frequently is in contact with the state Department of Environmental Protection on a number of issues, including permits issued for drilling. “They’re letting us know about it,” Maenza said.

Two other water companies that serve customers in the Back Mountain are leaving oversight up to DEP, the Susquehanna River Basin Commission and the state Fish and Boat Commission.

Donna Alston, a spokeswoman for Aqua Pennsylvania, said existing DEP regulations provide protection for the company that draws its water from wells. The company provides service to customers in Luzerne County through its White Haven Division. Statewide it serves 1.4 million people in 30 counties.

Still, Aqua is stepping up its own efforts.

The utility “will be monitoring water quality more frequently and extensively than required by regulation whenever drilling activity is occurring anywhere near one of its well supplies to detect and respond to any water quality changes that might occur,” Alston said.

What steps United Water takes depends upon how close a natural gas well is drilled to one of its water wells, said spokesman Bob Manbeck.

“If a permit for extraction was under consideration within a one mile radius of a United Water-owned well, we would intervene in the permitting process and attempt to ensure that the extraction points are an appropriate distance from our wells,” said Manbeck.

United Water has six wells in Dallas, two each in Dallas Township and Harveys Lake and one in Noxen Township in Wyoming County. It serves 10,000 customers in the Back Mountain.

Copyright: Times Leader

EnCana also allowed to put in gas metering station in Fairmount Township.

By Steve Mocarskysmocarsky@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

WILKES-BARRE – The Luzerne County Zoning Hearing Board on Tuesday gave the go-ahead for a natural gas drilling operation on 6 acres of land in Lake Township and a natural gas metering station on 5 acres in Fairmount Township – under certain conditions.

EnCana Oil & Gas USA Inc. sought a 12-month temporary use permit to drill a gas well, have a water tank storage facility and park five personnel trailers on a part of a 49-acre site located at 133 Soltis Road and owned by township Supervisor Amy Salansky and her husband, Paul.

The company also sought a special exception to install a permanent wellhead on the site.

In a separate application, EnCana sought a use variance to operate a natural gas meter station within a 112-acre parcel near the intersection of Mossville and Hartman roads on property owned by Thomas and Caroline Raskiewicz, in Fairmount Township, as well as a height variance to erect an associated 150-foot radio tower on the site.

Following a presentation by EnCana regulatory adviser Brenda Listner and listening to testimony from seven members of the public who opposed the plan in a packed hearing room at the county courthouse, the board adjourned for an approximately 10-minute executive session to, according to Chairman Lawrence Newman, “discuss the conditions that would be placed on the special exception request.”

The board then voted unanimously to approve all of Encana’s requests subject to the company providing evidence of:

• Approved permits from the state Department of Environmental Protection, the Susquehanna River Basin Commission and any other mandated agency.

• Road bonding based on acceptable rates as designated by supervisors of the townships of Lake and Lehman.

• Appropriate sound controls as necessary to minimize noise.

• Light diffusion as required to divert light away from neighboring structures.

• A dust-control plan including evidence that no contaminated water or water used in the hydraulic fracturing (fracking) process would be used for dust control.

• A pollution preparedness contingency plan, an emergency response plan and other plans set forth in EnCana’s “best management practices” outlined in a memo from EnCana.

Prior to the vote, local activist Dr. Thomas Jiunta, led off a round of questions from the public. He had asked EnCana representatives if many of the plans addressed in EnCana’s best management practices were available for review.

Listner said they were still in the works or under discussion with township officials.

Jiunta wanted to know how emergency response times in the area would be addressed, given that some sections of road are 17 feet wide and the average width of fire trucks and trucks associated with drilling operations are an average of 9 feet wide. There is no room for a truck to pull off a road and yield to an emergency vehicle, he said.

Michelle Boice of Harveys Lake said she doesn’t think “there’s any emergency preparedness,” noting that there are no police or fire departments in Lake Township, and the community relies on state police and volunteers from other communities for coverage.

Copyright: Times Leader

A lawyer offers sample laws to Back Mountain towns concerned about drilling.

By Rebecca Briarbria@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

DALLAS TWP. – The Back Mountain Community Partnership was advised Thursday afternoon to separately pass ordinances that may help protect against gas drilling issues.

The partnership is an intermunicipal group composed of Dallas, Franklin, Jackson, Kingston and Lehman townships and Dallas borough.

Attorney Jeffrey Malak, who is solicitor of the group, explained it would be better for each municipality to enact its own ordinances rather than to pass joint partnership ordinances because each municipality has its own unique needs.

Malak provided an example of an ordinance, created by the Pennsylvania State Association of Township Supervisors and the Pennsylvania State Association of Township Solicitors, which addresses height regulations of equipment, setbacks, access roads, wells, tanks and storage.

He also furnished sample dust, noise and light pollution ordinances and a sample road bond agreement. In addition, he provided a copy of Dallas’ zoning ordinance, which restricts drilling to certain areas of the borough and deals with screening and buffering and outdoor lighting issues.

Malak said such ordinances would take in all types of businesses but cannot be specific to natural gas drilling because the Oil and Gas Act of 1984 specifies the state oversees drilling. He stressed a lot of ordinances can be incorporated to help and that the municipalities are not limited to revising their zoning laws.

“We don’t know what’s allowed, what’s not, until we try some different things&hellip.” Malak said. “It’s a very, very complicated issue and like I said, it’s not a one size fits all.”

In other news, Tom Yoniski, a representative for state Sen. Lisa Baker, announced the senator’s office has arranged a meeting regarding gas drilling to be held from 6 to 8:30 p.m. on May 13 at Lake-Lehman Junior/Senior High School.

Yoniski said Penn State University officials will give a presentation on gas drilling. He said that officials from the state Department of Environmental Protection and the Susquehanna River Basin Commission will also attend.

Also, Gas Drilling Awareness Coalition members Karen Belli and Leeanne Mazurick, both of Dallas Township, gave a brief presentation on gas drilling and its impacts on the environment and the community.

Coalition member Audrey Simpson, of Kingston Township, showed a video she created of Dimock Township residents who were negatively affected by gas drilling.

Copyright: Times Leader

Firm with substantial holdings in Luzerne County taking next step toward exploration.

By Rory Sweeneyrsweeney@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

WhitMar Exploration Co., the only gas-drilling company so far to have leased substantially in Luzerne County, plans to begin drilling by the middle or latter part of next year, according to the company’s president.

“Right now, we’re just filing for some permits for two, possibly three wells we want to drill,” said Whit Marvin, who heads the Denver-based company. “We do plan on drilling it and testing it for the Marcellus Shale.”

Throughout 2009, WhitMar has leased more than 22,000 acres in, among other places, Fairmount, Ross, Lake, Lehman, Union, Hunlock, Huntington and Dallas townships with little money upfront by offering landowners a contractual guarantee to begin drilling within two years.

The contract also guaranteed permitting within the first year, and Marvin said that process is on track. The company is filing for drilling and water-consumption permits from the state Department of Environmental Protection and the Susquehanna River Basin Commission, and is looking into any other permits it might need, he said.

From there, the company will negotiate with the individual landowners about siting for the well pads and gaining access to them, he said.

Much of that will be based seismic testing that’s being done, the results of which Marvin expects before the end of the year. “In essence, you’re using ultrasound. You’re looking for anomalies under the surface … that would be attractive to drill into,” he said. “We can make some geologic interpretation, (but) it’s definitely not an exact science.”

A drilling contractor hasn’t been hired yet, he said, but the company has begun work elsewhere in the shale. It has leased “large blocks” in Lycoming, Wayne and Susquehanna counties, as well as in some counties in New York’s southern tier, he said. Of that, wells are being drilled in Chemung County, N.Y., and preparations for drilling are being made in Susquehanna and Lycoming counties, he said.

In Lycoming County, the industry is moving so fast that companies needing and offering services aren’t able to connect, according to Jeffrey Lorson, an industrial technology specialist at the Pennsylvania College of Technology.

For that reason, the college and a group of organizations interested in the industry are sponsoring a business-networking expo today. Lorson, who heads the college’s Marcellus Shale Education & Training Center, said about 130 vendors are scheduled to be at the free-admission event at the Hughesville Fairgrounds.

If you go

What: Business-networking expo for the gas-drilling industry

Where: Hughesville Fairgrounds, Lycoming County

When: Today, 10 a.m. to 3 p.m.

Description: About 130 vendors are meeting to display their goods and services, and to see the goods and services other companies are offering.

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader

The company hopes to see more than two dozen wells drilled on its property.

By Rory Sweeneyrsweeney@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

MEHOOPANY — In October, drilling for natural gas will begin at the Procter & Gamble plant in Mehoopany, and, if geologic estimates pan out, the company hopes to eventually see more than two dozen wells drilled on its property, saving it “tens of millions” of dollars annually for years to come.

The Wyoming County plant consumes about 10 billion cubic feet of natural gas a year that is piped up from the Gulf Coast, company spokesman Alex Fried said. The hope is that drilling on its own property will alleviate much of that need.

“If the wells are productive, sure there’s the possibility. We’ve got enough property there,” Fried said. “If they can supply that, I’ll gladly take it because I’d rather get it from under my own ground.”

Located in Wyoming County, the plant sits in a potentially productive section of the Marcellus Shale, the layer of rock about a mile underground stretching from New York to Virginia that has natural gas locked within its pores. Though it was known about for decades, accessing the rock has only recently become financially feasible with advancements in technology.

Colorado-based Citrus Energy Corp. contracted with P&G to construct five well pads at the company’s 1,300-acre property on the bank of the Susquehanna River. The township gave approval for all five sites, as did the state Department of Environmental Protection for the erosion and sedimentation plans.

Additionally, Citrus got a permit in December from the Susquehanna River Basin Commission to withdraw 499,000 gallons of water per day from the river. It has been bonded with the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation to cross state Route 87 and signed a road-maintenance agreement to use Carney Cemetery Road to access the sites.

Citrus still needs drilling permits from DEP for two sites, but Fried said the sites currently aren’t necessary. “The (sites) at the westernmost and easternmost part of our property aren’t going to be built until next year,” he said.

Starting in October, a well will be drilled at each of the middle three pads. Next year, if the geological indications look good, the company will consider drilling the wells deeper by going horizontally through the shale seam.

After that, the focus will shift to the two remaining pads.

If that all works out, Fried said, P&G could lease land at a 300-acre warehousing site about a mile from the plant, where at least one more pad could be built. In all, Fried estimated, perhaps 30 to 35 wells could be drilled.

Fried declined to discuss the royalty deal struck with Citrus, but described it as “very competitive” because the company could offer a variety of advantages, including access to water, industrial zoning and a direct connection between the buyer and seller.

It also boasts rail access, which Fried said could be used in the future to haul away the contaminated fluid that’s used to break open the rocks and release gas.

The drillers “can haul away 35,000 gallons at a time on a tanker car,” Fried said.

Another benefit is that the gas doesn’t have to go far to get used. “The pipeline will bring it right to the plant, so we’ll still get our royalty, except it just will be a discount off the price of the gas that we’re purchasing,” Fried explained.

Fried said interest in inking a deal came from both sides. He began researching the possibilities at the beginning of the year, around the same time unsolicited calls started rolling in from gas companies.

Originally, the companies simply wanted to lease the land and sell the gas, but Fried had another idea – keeping the gas at home.

“In many cases, they just came in and said, ‘We want to lease,’ ” he said. When he told them how much gas P&G would be willing to buy each year, “their jaws dropped and hit the floor,” Fried said.

Copyright: Times Leader

Gas drillers’ access to Harveys Lake water doesn’t seem likely.

HARVEYS LAKE – The borough is girding itself against potential plans to use lake water for natural-gas drilling, but the state Department of Environmental Protection thinks attempting to gain access to the water might be more trouble than it’s worth.

At its recent monthly meeting, borough council had solicitor Charles McCormick write to the Susquehanna River Basin Commission noting in the letter that the council “strongly opposes &hellip any consumptive use of water from the tributary system of Harveys Lake.”

Council became concerned after receiving a phone call and a notice. The notice was of Chesapeake Energy’s request to increase its one-day water-removal limit from the basin to 20 million gallons, and the phone call was from an engineering firm representing a gas company.

Brent Ramsey, an environmental scientist with Harrisburg-based international engineering consulting firm Gannett Fleming, had asked who owned the water rights at the lake and if the water could be procured for a well-drilling client, borough secretary Susan Sutton said.

He also called the borough’s Environmental Advisory Council asking similar questions, EAC secretary Denise Sult said.

Ramsey said the client directed that the operation be kept confidential, but acknowledged that his company’s involvement is in securing water-use permitting and that approval for a source of water hasn’t yet been secured. He refused to comment on whether the lake was still a target or if other sources were being sought.

Tapping the lake’s resources might prove difficult, however, said DEP spokesman Mark Carmon. “There’s been a long-standing question mark about who owns the bottom of the lake,” he said. “It’s probably a lot more complicated that it’s worth, in a legal sense, for anybody.”

He said the borough doesn’t own the water and individual lakefront landowners would have to be contacted. Deeds would have to be checked for exact descriptions of how far out into the water each property border protrudes. Any user-landowner agreement would still need to get SRBC approval “and face the wrath of the neighbors on each side of them,” he said.

“We think that’s the way it would play out,” he said.

He said that he wasn’t aware of any proposals or approvals of water usage in Luzerne County for gas drilling.

Rory Sweeney, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7418.

Copyright: Times Leader

Industry reps cite permitting delays; DEP head says issues to be resolved.

DALLAS TWP. – Representatives from every aspect of the state’s burgeoning natural-gas drilling industry met on Tuesday and, though differing on specifics, emphasized that Pennsylvanians stand upon a multibillion-dollar windfall, but only if the state streamlines its permitting process.

The hearing at Misericordia University was organized by the state Senate Republicans’ policy committee to identify potential problems with drilling the Marcellus Shale about a mile underground, but the senators instead were told that many of the problems lie with the state itself.

“Fundamentally, what the industry has said to us is, ‘We need to know what the rules are,’” said Tom Beauduy, the deputy director of the Susquehanna River Basin Commission. The commission oversees water removal from the river basin.

Industry representatives were dire with their characterizations. The industry is experiencing “permitting delays unlike we have ever seen in any other state,” said Wendy Straatmann, president of Ohio-based Exco-North Coast Energy Inc. “Why would I spend so much of our company’s time and resources when I can go to some other state and use the gas and oil manual and follow the regulations?”

Ray Walker, a vice president with Texas-based Range Resources Corp., agreed that an inclusive regulations manual would help companies “put our money into protecting the environment and not paperwork.” He noted that smaller companies are considering drilling here, but won’t if the permitting process remains slow and taxes increase. That could keep development slow, he said.

That’s a prospect that few at the hearing wanted. John Hanger, the acting secretary of the state Department of Environmental Protection, assured that his agency was “working to make sure that gas can be produced and water protected.” Part of the lag has come from a dearth of disposal options for the fluids used to hydraulically fracture the rock, and Hanger said his favored alternative was to find ways for the companies to simply inject them underground.

DEP would need to increase its regulatory force to keep up with the permitting and inspections demand predicted based on industry desires, he said, noting the department has recently requested substantially increasing its well-permitting fees.

Still the Republican senators felt DEP is clamping down too tightly. “When I ran for Senate, I was mad at the state for over-regulating my industry,” said Sen. Mary Jo White, R-Venango County, who had worked for an oil corporation. “I think we’re heading down that road again.”

William Brackett, the managing editor of a newsletter that reports on the Barnett Shale, said gas drilling there “is a prime reason the north Texas economy has only caught a cold and not the flu.”

John Hanger, acting DEP secretary, said part of the lag has come from a dearth of disposal options for the fluids used to hydraulically fracture the rock.

Copyright: Times Leader

Industry reps cite permitting delays; DEP head says issues to be resolved.

DALLAS TWP. – Representatives from every aspect of the state’s burgeoning natural-gas drilling industry met on Tuesday and, though differing on specifics, emphasized that Pennsylvanians stand upon a multibillion-dollar windfall, but only if the state streamlines its permitting process.

The hearing at Misericordia University was organized by the state Senate Republicans’ policy committee to identify potential problems with drilling the Marcellus Shale about a mile underground, but the senators instead were told that many of the problems lie with the state itself.

“Fundamentally, what the industry has said to us is, ‘We need to know what the rules are,’” said Tom Beauduy, the deputy director of the Susquehanna River Basin Commission. The commission oversees water removal from the river basin.

Industry representatives were dire with their characterizations. The industry is experiencing “permitting delays unlike we have ever seen in any other state,” said Wendy Straatmann, president of Ohio-based Exco-North Coast Energy Inc. “Why would I spend so much of our company’s time and resources when I can go to some other state and use the gas and oil manual and follow the regulations?”

Ray Walker, a vice president with Texas-based Range Resources Corp., agreed that an inclusive regulations manual would help companies “put our money into protecting the environment and not paperwork.” He noted that smaller companies are considering drilling here, but won’t if the permitting process remains slow and taxes increase. That could keep development slow, he said.

That’s a prospect that few at the hearing wanted. John Hanger, the acting secretary of the state Department of Environmental Protection, assured that his agency was “working to make sure that gas can be produced and water protected.” Part of the lag has come from a dearth of disposal options for the fluids used to hydraulically fracture the rock, and Hanger said his favored alternative was to find ways for the companies to simply inject them underground.

DEP would need to increase its regulatory force to keep up with the permitting and inspections demand predicted based on industry desires, he said, noting the department has recently requested substantially increasing its well-permitting fees.

Still the Republican senators felt DEP is clamping down too tightly. “When I ran for Senate, I was mad at the state for over-regulating my industry,” said Sen. Mary Jo White, R-Venango County, who had worked for an oil corporation. “I think we’re heading down that road again.”

William Brackett, the managing editor of a newsletter that reports on the Barnett Shale, said gas drilling there “is a prime reason the north Texas economy has only caught a cold and not the flu.”

John Hanger, acting DEP secretary, said part of the lag has come from a dearth of disposal options for the fluids used to hydraulically fracture the rock.

Copyright: Times Leader



Insiders say price declines and credit issues are limiting lease bids and bonus payment offers.

The natural-gas windfall seems to have dried up – at least for now.

Commodity price declines, disappearing credit worthiness and companies transitioning to produce gas from the lands they’ve leased have combined to limit lease bids and reduce bonus payment offers.

“Not only are we noticing it, there’s no argument that’s not happening,” said Jack Sordoni, who owns the Wilkes-Barre-based fossil-fuel drilling company Homeland Energy Ventures LLC and is negotiating leases for local landowners.

Though he’s recently inked leases in Fairmount Township with $2,850 per acre up-front bonuses, he said he’s also recently had similar offers in the same area fall to $2,000 per acre. Other sources are reporting offers dropping back to pre-summer levels of several hundred dollars.

Part of the cause for the change, he noted, is that some large companies have dropped out of the leasing competition because prices have fallen and the credit crisis has hampered their ability to take on short-term debt.

“I would suspect, not being an economist, that they would have pretty far reaching” effects, he said. “The ones who are signing aren’t competing with as many players, so the prices aren’t going to be as high.”

The companies say the clock is ticking on beginning work on existing leases, so they’re focusing on filling out the gaps in the territories they’ve already locked up.

“We have moved from the lease acquisition phase to the development phase,” Chesapeake Energy spokesman Matt Sheppard wrote in an e-mail. “We are leasing strategically to support our existing leasehold.”

Sheppard said that for Chief Oil & Gas and many companies “it is more of a shift to moving dollars into drilling and development” instead of continuing to build leasehold in unproven areas.

Chief Oil & Gas spokeswoman Kristi Gittins wrote in an e-mail: “A lot of acreage has been leased. As drilling begins and areas prove out, leasing should pick up.”

Sordoni said that in the business “a lot of times we call that ‘going operational,’ and think for many of them, that’s true.”

With drilling and production increasing, natural gas prices have dropped about 50 percent in the past half year, he noted.

“This was a gold rush at the beginning. It was a frantic pace. Companies were scrambling. The pullback of the commodity prices has certainly led to a slowdown,” he said.

But there are some positive indications for unsigned properties. For example, companies have already shown indications of ramping up production in the region.

Gittins said Chief will soon have four rigs in the region, including one made specially for maneuvering in the hilly Appalachian region, and two more by early 2009.

First, the gas isn’t going anywhere. Horizontal drilling only allows vertical fracturing of rock, and it’s illegal to drill beyond the leased boundaries. So the rule of capture – which allows gas or oil to be collected from a rock fracture that crosses a lease boundary – doesn’t apply.

Secondly, companies have already shown indications of ramping up production in the region.

Gittins said Chief will soon have four rigs in the region, including one made specially for maneuvering in the hilly Appalachian region, and two more by early 2009.

Chesapeake is predicting it will need much more water for its drilling operations before the 2012 expiration of its current permit with the Susquehanna River Basin Commission. While the company isn’t asking to change its permit to withdraw 5 million gallons daily from the river, it is asking to expand how much water it can use each day from 5 million gallons to roughly 20 million gallons.

Copyright: Times Leader