Posts Tagged ‘USD’

By Patrick Sweet (Staff Writer)
Published: June 15, 2010

NOXEN – Chief Oil and Gas may begin construction on a natural gas well just a few miles north of the border between Luzerne and Wyoming counties as soon as the second week of July.

Off Route 29 in Noxen, short stakes mark the future location of the drilling pad on Robert Longmore’s 97-acre farm. The state Department of Environmental Protection is currently reviewing the Texas-based gas company’s permit to place and operate a well it filed May 11.

The farm is near properties that are part of the Noxen Area Gas Group, a body of roughly 150 families with a combined 8,500 acres which is in the midst of negotiating a lease with Houston, Texas-based Carrizo Oil and Gas.

Just down the road from Longmore, Noxen group organizer Joel Field verified that the group is in the final stages of negotiation with Carrizo. Field and co-organizer Harry Traver declined further comment due to the sensitivity of the negotiations.

“Until things are settled down, they’d rather not give any statements,” Harry Traver’s wife, Dawn Traver, said Monday.

Longmore, 56, has owned the farm since 1998 and signed a lease with Chief roughly four and a half years ago. The landmen who approached Longmore about the deal, he said, made the three-page lease giving his family $25 per acre with the minimum 12.5 percent royalty sound like a good deal.

“We were kind of taken advantage of four and a half years ago,” Longmore said. “I know people getting $6,000 an acre.”

The lease had almost no provisions protecting Longmore’s farm. At the time, the landmen made it seem unlikely that drilling would ever commence during the terms of his lease, which ends May 15, 2011.

Chief Oil and Gas media contact Ben McCue attempted to reach operations employees for comment Monday afternoon but they were unavailable by press time.

Since Longmore signed, though, he said his experience with the company has been much more positive.

Earlier this year, the Longmores were given the opportunity to amend the lease.

“They proposed some amendments to the lease,” Longmore said, “so we countered with some amendments with some environmental stuff.”

Chief offered to reopen the terms of the lease in order to add protections for the company in anticipation of a Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision that could have invalidated thousands of gas leases where gas companies were deducting production costs from the state minimum royalty.

The opinion on the case was an interpretation of the Pennsylvania’s Minimum Royalty Act which establishes the 12.5 percent royalty requirement for all oil or natural gas recovered from a well but doesn’t stipulate when to calculate the royalty.

The court ultimately decided in favor of the gas companies roughly a week after the Longmores and Chief finalized the revised lease.

The Longmores added amendments that protected ground and surface water, along with the 0.25-mile stretch of Bowmans Creek that runs through the property.

Longmore’s son, Josh Longmore, manages the Luzerne County Conservation District and helped his father amend the lease.

“Unfortunately, they signed a very basic lease that didn’t have some of the protections that the newer leases have,” Josh Longmore said. “Our biggest goal, our biggest hope is that the property maintains its natural beauty, its agricultural purpose.”

The younger Longmore doesn’t have any stake in his parents’ farm, but felt that it was necessary to help. He and his father combed through leases that they found online and pulled out the clauses that fit their needs.

“There was like three or four different categories of amendments,” Longmore said.

Chief accepted 90 percent of their roughly 20 amendments, Longmore said.

The company did draw the line on an amendment that would have prohibited the company from disposing cuttings – the rock equivalent to sawdust – on the pad. The company argued it would be cost-prohibitive to haul it off-site, Longmore said.

“I really got the impression that they weren’t hiding anything from us,” Longmore said. “They were willing to answer every question we had.”

psweet@citizensvoice.com 570-821-2112

Copyright: The Citizens Voice

Copyright: Times Leader

By Steve Mocarskysmocarsky@timesleader.com
Staff Writer

Doug Ayers has never been one to take the easy way out, and his fellow directors on the board of the Lands at Hillside Farms are following his lead.

While much of the land surrounding the Lands at Hillside Farms has been leased for natural gas drilling into the Marcellus Shale a mile below, the board is refusing to lease any part of the nonprofit organization’s 412 acres in Kingston and Jackson townships.

“The easy route would have been to take millions of dollars to fix those greenhouses and the barn roofs and pay off our debt,” Ayers said last week while sitting under some shade trees outside the farm’s dairy store.

“The more honorable route is to work hard and go to the public because the public owns this place, and we expect them to step up to the plate,” he said.

A veterinarian and chairman of the board of the Lands at Hillside Farms, Ayers said the board agreed “to not engage the gas companies for drilling in the foreseeable future because we don’t consider it safe for the land that we’ve been entrusted with, or safe for our neighbors.”

Chet Mozloom, executive director of the farm, said he “got blitzed over a two- or three-week period with calls from people who must have thought we signed (a lease) for some reason – I don’t know why – and they expressed their disappointment.”

“They were terrified of the impact, and this was before the Clearfield well explosion. They were afraid of Huntsville or Ceasetown (reservoirs) getting destroyed because that’s where their water is coming from,” Mozloom said.

Ayers said the potential for catastrophe is too great to agree to sign a lease.

“The proof is in your newspaper – the reporting that you’re doing on the (oil leak in the) Gulf, on the (gas well) explosion in Clearfield County, the spills in Dimock, the contamination of the well water in Dimock (caused by methane gas migration), the woman in Dimock who flushed her toilet and it blew the back of her house off,” Ayers said.

“And we’re trying to give people food here,” Mozloom added, “so it’s a whole different game if this soil gets ruined. I mean, just imagine Clearfield happening right next to the Huntsville Reservoir. If that happens, it’s over.”

Hillside keeps to mission

It was January 2005 when Ayers met with the Conyngham family, who owned the farm since 1891, to pitch the idea of selling it to the public with a mission to promote organic, sustainable agriculture, resource conservation and historical preservation.

An agreement was struck and the new organization raised about $2 million in private donations and public grants, secured a roughly $2 million loan from Luzerne Bank and bought the farm for $4.058 million last fall.

The plan is to use revenue from self-sustaining micro-enterprises, such as the dairy store, a restaurant serving locally grown fare, a bed and breakfast that would double as a rentable site for private functions, a colonial living-history museum and educational facilities pay off the loan and produce enough revenue to keep the farm operating.

Ayers said the property is one contiguous block of 412 acres including farmland, pasture, more than 36 buildings and 200 acres of forest. “We’re desirable (to the gas companies) because we’re (one) large chunk,” he said.

And while the board of the Lands at Hillside Farms wouldn’t even listen to a proposal from a gas company, the board of another local nonprofit that Ayers helped found 17 years ago did.

Ayers said the board of the North Branch Land Trust, of which he is still a member, was most recently offered a $4,000-per-acre bonus payment and a 20-percent royalty for a non-surface disturbance lease.

“That means no well drilling on the property. The Land Trust will not allow well drilling on the property for sure, and we’re not entertaining any leases now because we’re not comfortable,” Ayers said.

More information needed

Ayers believes the boards of both nonprofits would support more stringent legislation for the gas and oil industry, but he doesn’t believe a proposed 2,500-foot buffer zone between well sites and water sources is adequate because “we’re in an experimental phase. &hellip We don’t know what’s going to happen. It’s all new to the geology of this area.”

In fact, Ayers said, he’d like to see a moratorium on drilling in the Marcellus Shale “until it’s proven to be much, much safer than it is right now.”

Some Land Trust board members are more comfortable with the gas industry than others, Ayers said. So it’s possible that in the future, “if the industry proved itself to be very, very safe and didn’t harm the people downstream and the environment, I think the board may go for that,” he said of allowing horizontal drilling far below the land’s surface. “But not now.”

The Land Trust owns about 700 acres, the majority of which is an approximately 667-acre tract north of Tunkhannock in Wyoming County. The remainder lies in seven other counties, including Luzerne, Sullivan, Susquehanna, Bradford, Wayne, Lackawanna and Columbia.

Ayers said the trust has been offered large amounts of money to lease the large tract because it’s near the Trans-Continental pipeline, “which makes it very desirable to the (gas) companies. They call us regularly,” he said.

Ayers said it would be “tempting” for the board to sign a lease because “all nonprofits need to survive, and &hellip it would allow us to perform our mission better.” He said the board recommends that people considering a gas lease should call the trust “because they’re very educated about it, they know all about this and they would guide them.

“They would prefer that people not drill on their property and do only subsurface drilling if anything. And frankly, they would prefer that the people wait to learn more and allow the industry to mature and prove itself. And they’re exemplifying that by their own decisions regarding the land they own themselves. It’s pretty hard to turn down the amount of money they’re talking about – it’s millions and millions of dollars,” Ayers said.

Ayers – man on mission

Ayers stressed that the trust and the Lands at Hillside Farms are two separate and unrelated entities. “The mission of the Land Trust is to conserve open space. It’s more of a land-related, conservation-related mission. The purpose of this facility – the Lands at Hillside farms – is to teach sustainable ways of life, or, in other words, to help people make decisions that are healthy for them, their community and the world.”

If Ayers could say one thing to area land owners, “love thy neighbor I think is what I would say, and consider them in your decisions, because they won’t be able to leave as easily if a catastrophe were to happen.

“The principles upon which this country was created rely upon giving more than taking. I mean, Aristotle, when he and his gang created democracy 2,500 years ago, said democracy is the best form of government, but it can only exist in the face of virtue. I’m not sure how long democracy can last when people are willing to risk their neighbors’ safety and welfare for money,” Ayers said.

Ayers said he thinks many people in the area are disappointed, and not just because of the ongoing corruption scandal in Luzerne County in which 30 people – including three county judges – have been charged by federal agents over the past 18 months.

Seeing neighbors signing gas leases, Ayers said, “is just another example of how people might get discouraged because they see people being selfish, they see people not caring for one another. How could the government possibly have allowed this to have occurred here without better regulation? It makes no sense,” Ayers said.

“But again, everything that goes wrong is the people’s issue. I mean it’s the people who run this place. It’s easy to say it’s the politicians and the oil companies and everybody else, but the reality is that it’s us. We are the ones responsible for all of this going on. And if we stand around and watch it, then maybe we deserve what we get.”

Steve Mocarsky, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7311.

Copyright: Times Leader

By Joe McDonald (Staff Writer)
Published: June 10, 2010

In a ruling with potentially far-reaching consequences in Pennsylvania’s lucrative and burgeoning natural gas industry, a federal judge in Scranton on Wednesday ruled a Susquehanna County landowner can sue Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. on the grounds it fraudulently misled him into a signing a lease at a lowball rate.

The suit, filed by John Kropa, is one of several cases across the state filed by landowners who claim natural gas drilling companies fraudulently induced them to sign leases that locked them into $25-an-acre rates. In a modern-day version of the California gold rush, companies have been rushing to make deals with landowners across Pennsylvania so they can tap into natural gas from the Marcellus Shale, a geological formation that runs under most of the state.

U.S. District Court Judge James M. Munley, in an eight-page memorandum and order, noted Cabot’s agents told Mr. Kropa that the company “would never pay more than $25 per acre for the lease,” yet his “neighbors were apparently paid more than $25 an acre for leases on their property.”

“They relied on this statement and signed the lease, only to discover later that these statements were false and that others had signed far more lucrative deals” with Cabot, Judge Munley said.

Cabot’s representatives also warned that if Mr. Kropa did not sign a lease, then Cabot would take it anyway by negotiating leases with neighbors and “capture the gas,” leaving Mr. Kropa “without a lease or gas on their land,” the memorandum stated.

Mr. Kropa signed an oil and gas lease with the West Virginia company in 2006 and received a $1,275 payment for allowing the company to explore his 51-acre spread in Brooklyn Twp.

Mr. Kropa’s claims are not unique, especially for many of the leases signed before 2008, said attorney Stephen Saunders, a Scranton energy attorney.

“I think the fraud type claims will most likely be significant in cases where individual plaintiffs own larger tracts of land, say more than 100 acres, or situations where small contiguous landowners control significant areas in the aggregate hundreds of acres or more and are litigating as a group,” Mr. Saunders said.

If Mr. Kropa is successful in proving he was the victim of fraud, he could theoretically renegotiate a new lease, assuming the company still wants the gas under his land.

Judge Munley’s court order also dealt with another volatile issue in the gas drilling business: royalty payments. Mr. Kropa along with other landowers had claimed they were shortchanged by the drilling companies because they were deducing expenses from the royalties.

Judge Munley said that issue had been dealt with by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which ruled the royalty agreement was valid under Pennsylvania law.

Contact the writer: jmcdonald@timesshamrock.com

View this article here.

Copyright:  The Scranton Times-Tribune

STEVE MOCARSKY smocarsky@timesleader.com

An attorney and a gas company land man warn that attractive lease offers from energy companies might not always be as generous as they seem.

Kit Akers, lead land man for new ventures at EnCana Oil & Gas, said other natural gas companies could come in throwing around relatively large bonus money offers to Luzerne County landowners if EnCana’s exploratory drilling is successful in Fairmount and Lake townships.

“Sometimes people get blinded by bonus money and aren’t always thinking about protecting themselves in the long run,” Akers said.

Luzerne County landowners might be experiencing bonus envy, considering that gas companies in Susquehanna and Bradford counties are offering $5,000 to $6,000 per-acre bonuses for drilling rights leases while EnCana is offering $2,500.

But Akers said the value of drilling rights in Luzerne County will increase if EnCana’s exploratory drilling is successful.

“Just the very fact that (EnCana’s acquiring state) permitting for the wells made the area more attractive to competition; that alone increases the potential value,” Akers said.

But Akers said landowners should consider more than just the bonuses and royalties offered in exchange for drilling rights.

“The WhitMar (a company EnCana has purchased leases from) lease form is very friendly to landowners. The lease is 14 pages long and loaded with surface protections, generous well location fees and other benefits to landowners. Other leases can be as short as two pages and include none of these protections. People sometimes get blinded by the money offered on the front end for a lease that is not worth as much to them,” Akers said.

Garry Taroli, an attorney with the Wilkes-Barre law firm Rosenn Jenkins & Greenwald, has been representing landowners in lease negotiations for about three years.

“The leases have become more friendly to property owners. With competition comes more benefits from the property owners’ point of view,” he said.

Many newer leases require minimum setbacks from structures and water sources, extra payments for damaged timber, reimbursements for harm to water or land and testing of water before, during and after drilling activities – paid for by the gas company, Taroli said.

Taroli advised that landowners at least have a lease reviewed by an attorney before signing it.

Some leases he’s seen contain language that could be a headache for landowners. While most leases set specific time limits for drilling, one lease he saw allowed a gas company to drill “for so long as gas could have been produced on the property.”

That term, Taroli said, “could be until doomsday.”

Jeffrey Nepa, an attorney with Nepa & McGraw in Carbondale and Clifford, said he’s happy to see property owners communicating on Internet forums to try to stay informed about lease issues.

“It’s nice to see people pooling their resources together to battle against the gas companies,” Nepa said.

“We live in the age of information. … We see that the gas companies are controlling the information. And a lot of times we see them put out misinformation. But at the end of the day, it comes down to caveat emptor – buyer beware.”

Steve Mocarsky, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7311.

Copyright: Times Leader

EnCana is currently signing standard leases giving Luzerne County landowners $2,500-per-acre bonuses.

STEVE MOCARSKY smocarsky@timesleader.com

The value of land leases with natural gas drilling companies has been climbing in counties to the north, but whether that happens in Luzerne County will depend on the results of exploratory drilling scheduled to begin this summer.

Natural gas exploration companies are now offering leases in Susquehanna and Bradford counties with up-front per-acre bonuses in the $5,000 to $6,000 range and royalties as high as 20 percent, said Garry Taroli, an attorney with Rosenn Jenkins & Greenwald representing area landowners.

Late last month, natural gas producer Williams Companies bought drilling rights to 42,000 net acres in Susquehanna County from Alta Resources for $501 million, placing the lease value on that land at nearly $12,000 per acre.

So people like Edward Buda, who owns land in Fairmount Township on which the first natural gas well in Luzerne County will be drilled in July, might be feeling some lessor’s remorse, given that they agreed to comparatively paltry up-front bonuses for the first two years of the lease term.

When Buda, 75, of Ross Township and his late brother and sister-in-law were in negotiations with WhitMar Exploration Co. early last year, they, like many others, agreed to bonus payments of $12.50 per acre each year for the first two years of the lease. The bonus increases to $2,500 for the third year.

However, if drilling begins on or under a landowner’s property before an anniversary date of the lease, any bonus payments for subsequent years become null and void and the royalty provision of the lease kicks in. So, if the drilling that is to begin next month on Buda’s property is successful, he likely won’t ever see that $2,500-per-acre bonus but will receive much larger royalty payments.

Since Buda’s lease was negotiated, WhitMar sold most of the company’s interest in the leases to EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc.

EnCana is currently signing standard leases giving Luzerne County landowners $2,500-per-acre bonuses – $1,000 the first year of the lease and $1,500 the second year, according to EnCana’s Group Lead for Land (New Ventures) Kit Akers.

Some landowners who signed the same type of deal with WhitMar as Buda believe they’ve been treated fairly.

Michael Giamber, 57, of Fairmount Township, lives about 2 miles from the Buda drill pad. While the Budas negotiated their lease on their own, Giamber joined a consortium of landowners who negotiated a deal with WhitMar in 2008 for bonuses of $12.50 per acre each year for the first two years of the lease, $2,500 per acre for the third year, and a 20-percent royalty on all gas produced.

“It was in the middle of a recession and leasing had pretty much stopped except in Dimock. We essentially partnered with WhitMar,” Giamber said.

In exchange for landowners accepting the initially small incremental bonus payment arrangement, WhitMar promised to do seismic testing of the leased land and partner with a company that would handle the drilling and secure permits for one to three exploratory wells in the county within two years.

“I signed on not because of the bonus, but because of the 20-percent royalty and because if they did not drill one to three wells after two years, we’d be free agents again,” able to renegotiate for better terms, Giamber said. “Because we were in a recession, what did we have to lose?”

“A lot of older people would rather more up-front money, and I can appreciate their position,” Giamber said.

Jeffrey Nepa, an attorney with Nepa & McGraw in Carbondale and Clifford, believes people who signed leases early for smaller bonuses were either “more desperate and needed money or were misinformed about what the extent of (drilling in the Marcellus Shale) was. Some people have had buyer’s remorse, so to speak, regretful that they signed and wanting to get out,” Nepa said.

Nepa said he’s seen bonus money increase, dip back down, “and now it’s creeping back up again. And it appears that landowners “who held out, so to speak, are the ones that are rewarded with the largest contracts. In the Barnett Shale (in Texas), I’ve heard of property owners getting in excess of $20,000 per acre, and they were the ones who held out.”

Gas companies normally drill in 640-acre blocks of land. So people with a larger tract of land are better off holding out for better lease terms, Nepa said.

On the other hand, those who signed leases earlier are now the ones who will see royalty payments kick in much sooner than anyone else, because they will be the first to have wells drilled, said Robert Schneider, 39, of Fleetville, Lackawanna County.

Schneider joined a landowner consortium that negotiated leases with a $2,100 bonus and an 18-percent royalty in 2008 with Exco Resources, and he’s glad he didn’t hold out for more.

“Two years have gone by and I have three years left. … There’s a risk if you wait,” Schneider said, speculating that implementation of more rigorous and costly government permitting requirements, the establishment of a severance tax or finding insufficient or no gas in his area are all reasons that companies might pull out and stop leasing.

EnCana’s Akers backed up what Giamber and Schneider had to say. “People who leased earlier put themselves in a position to most likely have their land drilled earlier,” she said.

And Akers said, if WhitMar had not been able to secure leases at relatively low cost to the company, exploration in Luzerne County might not have begun as soon as it has.

“Because these people leased early to WhitMar, WhitMar was able to build a large position of leases that allowed for horizontal drilling. That’s what got a company like EnCana interested in coming to Luzerne County. If we had not seen a consolidated lease position, it’s unlikely WhitMar would have gotten a company like EnCana to come in … It was possible that the $12.50 offer was the only offer those people would ever get,” she said.

Akers also believes that the reason landowners in Susquehanna and Bradford counties are being offered much higher bonuses is because hundreds of wells have been drilled there and natural gas extraction has proven successful.

“Luzerne County, on the other hand, is really on the frontier. There’s no way to know if shale within a geographic region will produce any gas or enough gas to make drilling profitable without actually drilling wells. There have been no wells drilled in Luzerne County, so that’s the reason why there’s a difference in lease prices between Luzerne County and other counties,” Akers said.

If wells on Buda’s land and a site in Lake Township don’t produce any gas or at least enough of it to make drilling there worthwhile, land lease values in Luzerne County could drop to zero, Akers said.

If the wells do produce significant amounts of gas, however, competition for drilling rights will definitely heat up, Akers said, and with it the price.

Steve Mocarsky, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7311.

Copyright: Times Leader

MARC LEVY Associated Press Writer

HARRISBURG — State environmental regulators worked Sunday to get to the bottom of what caused a natural-gas well to spew explosive gas and polluted water for 16 hours last week before it could be brought under control.

Neil Weaver, spokesman for the Department of Environmental Protection, blamed a failure on the well’s blowout preventer, a series of valves that sit atop a well and allow workers to control the pressure inside. Investigators are trying to figure out what caused the malfunction.

The blowout is the latest in a string of accidents connected by regulators to the rapidly growing pursuit of the rich Marcellus Shale gas reserve that lies beneath much of Pennsylvania.

It seems likely the Pennsylvania blowout will enter the debate in the Capitol, where legislators are battling over the merits of an extraction tax and tighter regulations on an industry that has spent several billion dollars and drilled more than 1,000 wells in Pennsylvania in just a couple years.

State Rep. David Levdansky, D-Allegheny, said such oil problems could bring increased interest in a moratorium on leasing public land for gas drilling and a severance tax that could largely fund existing environmental protection and cleanup programs. Levdansky is a leading environmental advocate.

Weaver declined to discuss whether investigators have found anything so far or whether well driller EOG Resources Inc. of Houston committed any violations that could lead to fines or any other penalties.

An EOG spokeswoman said Sunday the investigation into the cause is ongoing, and the company had no light to shed on the blowout.

Crews evacuated the site Thursday night and didn’t regain control over it until just past noon Friday. No one was injured, the gas didn’t explode and polluted water didn’t reach a nearby waterway, officials said.

The blowout sent highly pressurized gas and polluted water 75 feet into the air. Huge tanks were required to cart off chemical- and mineral-laced water collected on the grounds of the private hunting club where the well had just been drilled.

Copyright: Times Leader

By Steve McConnell (Staff Writer)
Published: June 2, 2010

CARBONDALE – Plans to develop an extensive railroad facility to serve the natural gas industry in Fell Twp. moved forward Tuesday.

The Carbondale Industrial Development Authority unanimously approved a motion to allow Honesdale-based Linde Corp. to purchase a nearly two-acre parcel in the Enterprise Drive business park. The company intends to use it for unloading materials from railcars for shipment via truck. It also would include storage facilities and on-site processing of drilling fluids.

The company is currently developing an adjacent property, purchased from the local railroad authority, that is part of its overall plan to have a suitable staging area for on-site processing of drilling fluids and a railroad facility capable of serving the industry, said company Vice President Christopher A. Langel.

Authority Chairman Bob Farber said there has been ambiguity as to what exactly Linde Corp. intends to develop on the new property since the company has been meeting with the board about it.

“You’ve never given us site plans,” Mr. Farber said.

Mr. Langel said the company has submitted plans and has been meeting with the board since at least October about the project.

Among plans discussed Tuesday, existing railroad tracks, which run through the heart of the city, will be extended to enable off-loading of materials at the site.

The company, which has invested more than $500,000 in the so-called Carbondale Yards Bulk Rail Terminal, is also partnering with Houston-based Baker Hughes to mix sand, water and chemicals into a concentration needed for prospective natural gas drilling sites in the area.

Mr. Langel described it as a nontoxic mixture.

The company also is eyeing the former Wells Cargo building, a large-scale facility inside the business park, as an additional storage and distribution point related to the overall operation, Mr. Langel said.

The authority board tabled a motion that would give Linde Corp. permission to purchase and develop the Wells Cargo property.

In addition, the company is in negotiations with the Susquehanna River Basin Commission to withdraw water from the Lackawanna River for potential use by the natural gas industry. The industry needs an abundance of water to help bust open underground rock formations to release natural gas, a process called hydraulic fracturing.

City administrators have said they support the project for its job-creation potential. It is expected to be completed by the end of the month.

To see this article, click here.

Copyright:  The Scranton Times-Tribune

The Susquehanna River Basin Commission has a set of rules for gas companies.

STEVE MOCARSKY smocarsky@timesleader.com

The Department of Environmental Protection isn’t the only state agency intent on protecting water sources from natural gas drilling activities that could affect area residents.

Tom Beauduy, deputy director of the Susquehanna River Basin Commission, said the commission requires drilling companies to account for “every gallon of water” withdrawn from any water source within the basin – where it comes from, where it’s used and what happens to it after it’s used.

And, a $1 million water quality monitoring system is being put in place near drilling sites within the basin, Beauduy said.

Beauduy said Marcellus Shale development in Pennsylvania hit the commission “like a tsunami,” just like it did every other impacted agency in the state.

The natural gas industry uses 4 million to 6 million gallons of water per natural gas well to release gas from the shale in a process called hydraulic fracturing, or fracking. Currently, the industry is using about 1 million gallons per day in the state, and Beauduy expects that amount to increase to 28 million a day.

The commission, which is responsible for water resources planning, management, conservation, development, use and allocation, responded quickly to the industry’s needs. Protocols were adjusted so the commission could deal with the surge of water allocation requests, but no corners are cut when granting water withdrawal approvals, Beauduy said.

All companies known to be drilling in the Marcellus Shale region, which underlies more than 72 percent of the Susquehanna River Basin, were notified of the commission’s regulatory requirements. And the commission activated a previously unused rule that authorized an administrative “approval by rule” process for water withdrawals solely from public water supplies.

To date, Beauduy said the commission has approved 111 surface water withdrawals, with 55 applications pending; and 22 approvals of public water supply withdrawals, with 14 pending. It has also issued 662 approvals by rule for individual well pad sites and has 181 pending.

While the amount of water the gas industry needs might seem massive, Beauduy pointed out that the golf and ski resort industry in Pennsylvania consumes an average of 56 million gallons per day. He said industry needs can be accommodated if regulated properly. The industry must abide by restrictions that prevent negative impacts on streams and rivers that could harm aquatic life and water quality.

And while DEP regulates how the industry must dispose of flowback water from fracking operations, the commission will track area rivers and streams to catch a contamination problem.

The commission will have 30 water quality monitoring stations set up by the end of June in the regions where drilling in the Marcellus Shale is most active, as well as other locations where no drilling activities are planned so the commission can collect control data. The monitoring network will provide constant data collection with instruments sensitive enough to detect subtle changes in water quality on a frequency that will allow background conditions and any changes to them to be documented throughout the year.

Each monitoring station will be equipped with water quality sensors and a transmitter to continuously monitor and report water temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, ability to conduct electricity (conductance) and water clarity. The water depth also will be recorded to establish a relationship with stream flows.

The monitoring of conductance is key to detecting impacts associated with natural gas activities if they occur because water produced by the natural gas industry is generally 200 times more conductive of electricity than water normally measured in streams in the basin.

The monitoring network, the data from which will be accessible online by the public, will provide early warnings to help DEP officials respond more rapidly and better pinpoint causes if water quality conditions change. It will also help local public water suppliers, local watershed groups and communities stay informed.

Steve Mocarsky, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 970-7311.

Copyright: Times Leader